Im sure most people on this forum are familiar with red letter media's review of 'The Phantom Menace', if youre not, then I would highly recommend it.
One point he makes about Star Wars is how the endings started simply (attack on death star) and ended up with too many things going on (Gungun battle, Jedi duel, Anakin space battle, Amidala storms the palace). In his words 'the simplest endings to the first two movies, with the least locations and events, are vastly more interesting because the plot is built up to them and we can focus on the one thing'.
I wonder how people feel about this statement in relation to the end of Deep Space Nine. The last episode is stuffed with so much stuff that Ive always found it to be a bit of a disappoinment. Theres no 'focus on the one thing', in fact I think thats a complaint that can be made of the seventh season in general; theres too much to focus on, and the characters arent as connected as they were. Does anyone else think there should have been much less going on in that, with everything built up around one plot point?
One point he makes about Star Wars is how the endings started simply (attack on death star) and ended up with too many things going on (Gungun battle, Jedi duel, Anakin space battle, Amidala storms the palace). In his words 'the simplest endings to the first two movies, with the least locations and events, are vastly more interesting because the plot is built up to them and we can focus on the one thing'.
I wonder how people feel about this statement in relation to the end of Deep Space Nine. The last episode is stuffed with so much stuff that Ive always found it to be a bit of a disappoinment. Theres no 'focus on the one thing', in fact I think thats a complaint that can be made of the seventh season in general; theres too much to focus on, and the characters arent as connected as they were. Does anyone else think there should have been much less going on in that, with everything built up around one plot point?