• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

JJ Abrams is pissed over leaked photos

I wonder to know where is this location?

California?
The TrekMovie article about this says only "Southern California". There's nothing I can see in the pictures which would cause me to think it's anywhere else, but I don't recognize anything distinctive enough that I could place it more exactly than "Greater Los Angeles area".

It's definitely not the Dodger Stadium parking lot, though.
 
Actually a lightning storm will be encountered and a hole will open up, and old Kirk would fly out of it from another timeline.
 
Bob Orci in section comments Trek Movie: " I accidently tweeted the identity of the bad guy but managed to erase it before anyone saw it."

How can someone “accidently” tweet something?
 
Yeah, like he wrote this top secret story, signed all the NDA's and then accidentally let slip something in a tweet.

I call attention-getting bullshit.

Err.... anyone know how to hack twitter?:D
 
Yeah, like he wrote this top secret story, signed all the NDA's and then accidentally let slip something in a tweet.

I call attention-getting bullshit.
Are you suggesting that Bob Orci might be trolling the Internet? :lol:

Err.... anyone know how to hack twitter?:D
Anything which might theoretically have been tweeted would almost certainly have been snagged by one of several Twitter aggregators, no matter how quickly it was deleted afterwards.
 
Since the villain is very likely to be already known or at least mentioned in the most popular speculations, I fail to see how someone seeing a tweet can cause an information leak. If they have no proof that they saw it they would be as good as someone who is pretending. There's a limited number of options, you can simply pick one and claim to have seen the tweet, or you could inject it yourself if you're running a Twitter aggregator.

That said, I happened to be looking at his Twitter at exactly that moment and it said that the villain is Charlie.
 
This doesn't mean anything. Charlie may be the name of the villain (probably Cumberbatch), but not Charlie X.
 
JJ seems over-protective doesn't he? I see he is irate over the set pics leaked so far and is rushing around to find ways to keep it from happening again.
 
Charlie Brown, that is.

5487497421_d83c4d0767_m.jpg
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top