Based on your stated intention not to respond tonight, and then only to posters who respond in the method you set out, you have earned an infraction for trolling. Comments to PM
This aside, I'll play. I think I can call his bluff.
Umm why in the world should she be required to participate in the celebration and affirmation of something she finds morally reprehensible?
She shouldn't. However, in standing up for her beliefs, she should be willing to accept the consequences of this decision. i.e.: boycotts from those that disagree with her actions and the resulting loss of business.
Contrary to the depraved rantings of some on here, it is NOT a settled issue, scientifically, morally and existentially, that homosexuality is as natural as people being born black, latino, a pacific islander, female or whatever else.
Actually, there is plenty of
scientific evidence that sexual orientation is determined through natural causes, such as genetics and hormones a fetus is exposed to in the womb, and no scientific evidence that it is a choice and nothing else. Morality and existentialism are infinitely debatable, so yeah, those aren't, and never will be, settled.
That's only been accepted because, besides cowardly politicians who don't wanna be tarred with the word "backwards" (oh, the horror!), there are a large number of persons attached to their pseudo-heroism, who bombard dissenters with zero-sum rationales and pointless circular logic.
Also, all the scientific evidence I mentioned that is cited in the Wikipedia article. (Also, before someone questions the accuracy of Wikipedia:
An article about the accuracy of Wikipedia from a scholarly journal.)
The fact that there are many who were once practicing homosexuals who have gone on to live healthy, contented heterosexual lives (and some who have even gotten married - I know a few) alone tells me that homosexuality is NOT equivalent to being born black or any "race". Michael Jackson aside, there is no such thing as a black man or brown men or yellow man who can change what they genetically are.
Sexual orientation is not determined by behavior alone. Based on your post, I take it you're heterosexual. If you have had sex, did you know you were heterosexual before the first time you had sex, or was your sexuality unknown until you became a practicing heterosexual? If you're a virgin, how do you know what your orientation is? Is it because you feel attraction for the opposite sex? Is it because opposite sex partners feel right?
I identify as a straight male. If I was raped by another man, does that make me gay? No, it does not. As far as "cured" homosexuals go, yeah, they can display heterosexual behaviors, but there is no way of knowing whether they've actually become heterosexual or are just kidding themselves.
I could do the opposite. I could go pick up some dudes at a gay bar, sex them up, and say I've never been happier. However, on the inside I'd still be attracted to women. I could do it, but I wouldn't enjoy it.
Btw, since the inevitable insults will begin flying (God forbid someone here actually reason for themselves, and refuse to toe the ultraliberal line on the BBS - Public Enemy Number #1!), please know that I will NOT respond to any questions or challenges on tonight, as I will be quite busy, and when I do, it will ONLY be those that reasonably engage in discussion, not slash and burn, zero-sum insults. Mere name-calling and defamation is for children. I grew out of that stage a long time ago.
Reasonable, insult-free response granted. Let's see where this goes.
^Wow. That was awesome. Am I allowed to say that?
No, you may not. This is why asking for permission is a bad idea.