• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

WTF, Kirk?

If the ship's weapons were powerful enough to destroy an entire planet, then couldn't they use them to disrupt the storm on the planet as well?

I thought they could only destroy half a continent, or was that only using the portable remote control cannon thingy.

I would think the Enterprise received some upgrades between The Cage and A Taste of Armageddon.
 
There was never an indication in the series of more than one transporter.

Unless one counts "the" transporter being on different decks in different episodes, or having a different internal layout in different episodes, or being behind a differently colored door in different episodes, or having differently arranged walls in different episodes.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Well, continuity errors don't count (James R Kirk. What year is it, Trelane?). Sets change at the speed of plot and the engine room is a good example of an evolving set. It's pretty clear there was only one transporter room. Did they ever come out and say which deck the TR is located on? Most of the time, it was "meet me in the…" Even the movies didn't mention multiple transporters.

"Transporter room, beam the captain out of there now!"

"Um which one, sir?"

"Which one what?"

"Which transporter room? We have eight."

"I don’t care! Transporter room four. Just beam him up now!"

"Oh, four isn't answering, I think Lipshitz is on a break."

"Damn it, any…"

"Oops, too late."
 
I LOVE ST classic, I do. But sometimes things happen within an episode that just make you go: ''WTF?''

I was re-watching THE CITY ON THE EDGE OF FOREVER recently, the part soon after McCoy has fled down to the Gateway planet. Now McCoy is out of his mind from a chemical 'overdose' and naturally Kirk is beaming down to the planet to rescue him. The planet is of unknown risk at this point.

So Kirk leads a landing party to the surface- of course Kirk would be there, he's the boss plus Bones is his good friend. He brings Spock along, good idea you need a science officer to analyze whatever unknown thing could be there.

There's two security guards, they might be useful to restrain McCoy if he becomes violent, or if there's some dangerous beastie to zap into nothingness.

And then we have...the Chief engineer and the head of communications?!?

I really fail to see how their specific skills would have been useful for a rescue mission on an almost-deserted planet.

Yes I know, they are the main actors and they were needed to say the lines assigned to the crewmen that had to stay behind, but forgetting all that one has to wonder what's up with Kirk? No wonder the M-5 gave him such a hard time if he makes such bizarre command decisions...

He didn't bring another doctor or even a nurse along...

What the hell, Kirk?

The strangeness is made even more wtf-y by the fact that through the entire episode, Scotty and Uhura are left standing by the Guardian with nothing to do.
 
Wasn't Uhura's big line in "City" when she tells Kirk she's "frightened" ?

That's why she was there. I don't see Kirk offering a nice cozy embrace to Sulu or Scotty if they'd said that line.
 
It's the "Kirk knows this is the most dangerous planet in the universe so he takes the entire senior staff with him when he beams down Syndrome", diagnosed by Phil Farrand.
 
Why bring the B team if the odds are that badly against them, though?

Timo Saloniemi
 
So...we complain that the secondary characters aren't given enough to do on the show, but then we also complain when they are included in the storyline because they shouldn't be on the landing party.

We should be very careful; this is how B-plots are born. :D
 
So...we complain that the secondary characters aren't given enough to do on the show, but then we also complain when they are included in the storyline because they shouldn't be on the landing party.

We should be very careful; this is how B-plots are born. :D

When the cast is more then 3-4 people, B-Plots are pretty much a necessity. TOS itself DID do B-plots from time to time.
 
TOS itself DID do B-plots from time to time.
Very, very seldom, if ever.

If you're thinking of times when, say, Kirk and Spock were working on an episode's central dilemma down on a planet while Scotty or McCoy (or even Sulu or Uhura) were working on the same dilemma up on the ship, I don't consider that a B-plot. A B-plot would be if we were to switch from Kirk and Spock working on the problem planetside to a scene of Scotty working on some totally unrelated problem in Engineering or Sulu in the gym working on his fencing skills. IMO, not the same thing, at all. When the secondary characters were used, it was always in service to the story's main plotline.

While you are correct that squeezing large numbers of ensemble cast members into a single, focused plot is often difficult and makes the use of B (and C and D)-plots necessary if everyone is to get some screen time, I love that TOS (like most dramatic television of its time) focused on a small core of central characters and stories strong enough that switching the action to a B-plot would have seemed frivolous if not downright jarring.
 
It's pretty easy to have a single plot all the centrals can be equally involved in when there are only 3 centrals, and said centrals are also freud archetypes (the Id, Ego, Superego).
 
I mainly find the insistence on shoving in B plots rather annoying, considering that from TNG onward, the episodes only had 43 minutes of screen time to tell a story anyway, while TOS had 52 minutes in an episode and had enough in the average script that they didn't NEED a B plot.

If you don't have enough of a story to cover 43 minutes and have to cram in a second storyline, you've got problems.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top