It could just the prop folks misunderstanding "the day before the Doctor dies." Or not even caring.
W Morgan Sheppard was in the TNG episode as Dr Ira Graves. In The Impossible Astronaut he plays Canton Everett Delaware III, as does his son Mark. Both of them have cross-pollinated a lot when it comes to sci-fi projects.4) Who the old guy was from the first episode that looked like Data's father from TNG's "The Schizoid Man."
Yeah, but it would only buy you a few minutes.Killing Rory is easy enough.
Except you're not paying attention. You're clinging to a minor mistake regarding something that can barely be said to have appeared on-screen, and ignoring everything else. Or worse, trying to twist it to your own ends rather than accepting what's actually happening.Personally I just call it paying attention and not being spoonfed, actually. All part of the fun fandom and viewing experience.
Except you're not paying attention. You're clinging to a minor mistake regarding something that can barely be said to have appeared on-screen, and ignoring everything else. Or worse, trying to twist it to your own ends rather than accepting what's actually happening.Personally I just call it paying attention and not being spoonfed, actually. All part of the fun fandom and viewing experience.
4) Who the old guy was from the first episode that looked like Data's father from TNG's "The Schizoid Man."
were you not paying attention to The Impossible Astronaut? that was the older version of FBI Agent Canton Everett Delaware III. THEY TOLD US THAT.
Granted. But seeing as how that's the only thing that doesn't fit, and it's the only thing that's barely seen on-screen, Occam's razor says "hello."
Except you're not paying attention. You're clinging to a minor mistake regarding something that can barely be said to have appeared on-screen, and ignoring everything else. Or worse, trying to twist it to your own ends rather than accepting what's actually happening.Personally I just call it paying attention and not being spoonfed, actually. All part of the fun fandom and viewing experience.
No, it's a minor prop problem. With the newspaper. With a fine printing of the date that you can't even see without pausing and searching for it.
Which brings up the same question I asked before. Why would this particular prop problem come to exist, especially so close to the stated death date of the Doctor? Do you have any information, such as the date the episode was filmed, that would suggest a reason for this error to end up coincidentally so close?
He also played a soul hunter on Babylon 5. His son played Badger on Firefly.
Well, right off the bat, I have to wonder why the hell us North American viewers have that stupid Amy's opening narration for this episode. Amy and Rory have only one scence cameo in this episode so to have Amy telling us of meeting the Doctor as a child and joining him on adventures as a grown up seems really pointless in this episode. I accept Karen Gillan and Arthur Darvill are still in the credits due to contractual reasons, but there was no need for the opening narration. Actually, there's never any need for it, but that's besides the point.
.
Granted. But seeing as how that's the only thing that doesn't fit, and it's the only thing that's barely seen on-screen, Occam's razor says "hello."
Occam's Razor also says that the date probably isn't a coincidence. It strikes me as something done intentionally, either by the production staff or asked for by the writer.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.