Also First Conatct confirms that the baddies in WW3 were the Eastern Coalition.
Well, no,
Star Trek: First Contact confirms that the
combatants against the United States in World War III were the Eastern Coalition. That doesn't mean they were necessarily bad guys -- hell, for all we know, maybe the
United States was the one who was the bad guy!
We know, from the audio commentary, that the ECON is basically China.
No, we don't. We know from the audio commentary that the Americans' enemy in the 2063 era was originally going to be China, but that this was then changed to the Eastern Coalition. That does not mean that the Eastern Coalition
was China or a Chinese-dominated alliance or imperium. That's one valid interpretation, but it's not canonical and other interpretations are also valid.
We also know what China was like in ST's WW III era, from the TNG pilot flashback scenes (Q's courtroom).
As
Timo noted, the presence of Asians in servant roles doesn't necessarily indicate that Q's re-creation of a court from the Post-Atomic Horror was an indication of what 2070s China was like.
And I
really don't think that
the presence of a
European-style heraldic eagle is an indication this is supposed to be Asia.
Sure, it
could be China, but it's not necessarily so.
Or perhaps there was no such division, if you believe the "there is no such thing as good and evil" crowd.
You don't have to believe that there's no such thing as good and evil to believe that two bad guys can go to war and neither side be decent. Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union waged war upon one-another, and I sure as hell wouldn't say either one was morally superior to the other. Bastards fight each other, too.
Besides, that's the
Post-Atomic Horror era, not the World War III era. Key word being "post." Even if that
was China in the 2070s re-creation of Q's, that doesn't mean that China was like that
before the war. Remember, Data established that World War III occurred approximately ten years before First Contact -- the early 2050s. That's twenty years' difference, more than enough time for a hypothetically decent Chinese society to have degenerated into barbarism as a reaction to atomic devastation from a hypothetically immoral American enemy.
Which is not to say that that's necessarily the case, either. Again, the point is simply that we don't know. America could have been the good guy, or it could have been the bad guy. No idea which. We shouldn't assume.
Also First Conatct confirms that the baddies in WW3 were the Eastern Coalition.
Well, no,
Star Trek: First Contact confirms that the
combatants against the United States in World War III were the Eastern Coalition. That doesn't mean they were necessarily bad guys -- hell, for all we know, maybe the
United States was the one who was the bad guy!
Oh I'm open to the idea that the United States
could have been the bad guys in Star Trek's WW3.Its just that we dont really have any evidence to indicate this.
Oh, sure. I'm not saying that it necessarily
was, I'm saying it's a possibility. In other words: We don't know who the good guys and bad guys were in
Star Trek's World War III and shouldn't assume that America was necessarily the good guy just 'cos it's America (nor that it wasn't).
Whatever references are made about the US seem to be positive( even in the DS9 santcuary districst episdoes) and of course the Federation itself is based on the United States in part.
Well, the good parts, anyway. The Federation isn't based on, for instance, the United States's history of violent conquest of Native American lands and its oppression of Native and African Americans, for instance, which were of course
vital parts of American society and history.
FWIW, the one known bad guy from the era, Colonel Green, looks decidedly Caucasian and has an English/American name.
Timo Saloniemi
Excellent point. He also has an American Midwestern accent in his speaking appearance in ENT's "Demons"/"Terra Prime."