I'll get a ruler and my camera...
I believe it's been found that self-reported penis sizes tend to be inflated, on average, by half an inch to an inch.
I'll go get the condoms.
How big is your wang?
- Thread starter Josh Kelton
- Start date
I'll go get the condoms.
Isn't it amazing that the internet is only populated by the well endowed geniuses?
And I voted honestly. Although I'm not willing to announce my vote
(nothing shameful, but not internet brag-worthy ).However, if we did have an IQ poll, I can claim legitimately close to 140, although I highly doubt the internet is dominated by the 99% percentile of intelligence.
I'll get a ruler and my camera...I believe it's been found that self-reported penis sizes tend to be inflated, on average, by half an inch to an inch.
I'll go get the condoms.
I like where this is going ...
A
Amaris
Guest
Dear Popular Science,
You'll never believe what happened to me today...
You'll never believe what happened to me today...
FOR SCIENCE!!!
A
Amaris
Guest
Science Rules!
Inertia is the property of matter?
Archimedes would be proud.The most accurate measurement would be volume...and I don't mean turning it up to 11. You can do simple water displacement in order to figure it out how many cc's the old boy is.
But there are some serious practical difficulties with doing that in a simple fashion, unless I'm missing something.
Let me think this through. How about take a water glass or cup filled up (warm water, I'd guess!). Tricky bit is the dip. Maybe get on all fours over it, dip the dipstick and displace your volume in water. Next take a two-cup measuring cup full of water, use it to refill the glass. Subtract whatever's left in the measuring cup from two cups and you have your wang's volume in cups. Use this website to convert it to ccs. Voila!Archimedes would be proud.The most accurate measurement would be volume...and I don't mean turning it up to 11. You can do simple water displacement in order to figure it out how many cc's the old boy is.
But there are some serious practical difficulties with doing that in a simple fashion, unless I'm missing something.
Last edited:
Ah, okay, that would work. I was worried about overflowing the water, but you could just subtract that from the original volume (assuming the first cup's volume was known), or do it your way with a container of known volume.
I actually think I learned this in an old science class. (They didn't use penises as the example, however.)
I actually think I learned this in an old science class. (They didn't use penises as the example, however.)
Nobody told me there'd be math involved. 
I'm a practical man, after allNobody told me there'd be math involved.
I much prefer the hands-on approach. Get me a ruler and a line of guys.
You could make a plaster cast of the little guy. That way you could check the volume and have a family memento as well.
The volume idea might work but we would need to set some basic parameters for an accurate experiment. Do we submerge up to the abdomen? If so, how do we adjust for anomalies in scrotum attachment? If the scrotum attaches high on the penis shaft the excess skin will throw off your readings. What about those who have a particularly dense bush? We could all shave for the experiment. Circumcision might also be a factor to take into account since the excess skin might inflate the numbers. Do we set the males who are uncircumcised into a separate control group?And RJ, creating a casting would be difficult. If we were to use a quick setting molding material we might be able to get an accurate mold but the subject would need to stay consistently erect for about three minutes. If not, the mold would break or warp during the process. Using constant stimulation is really the only way to keep a consistent erection. And since the erection would be covered, direct stimulation to the prostate would have to be utilized. I don't think you would have many volunteers willing to participate if that method is used.
A
Amaris
Guest
If there's cookies and juice, I'm in.
If I had one, it would be a foot long, I'm sure.
