Exeter is still in production. As has been discussed numerous times before, their final act is mostly ready; to imply that it is and will always be incomplete is unfair to the people behind Exeter and irresponsible of you to the readers of your blog as it is, to date, misinformation. Pop in to the Exeter thread sometime before making a sweeping generalization like this.
And if I'd reviewed the first few acts with no completion, you'd be accusing me of favoring the
Exeter people over most other projects that actually made it to the finish line.
I'm not going to go down this road with you again, Randy. Please do not presume to tell me what my response would be to hypothetical comments you
would have made.
There's something to be said in actually completing an effort.
I don't know if this is supposed to be a dig at me or at the Exeter crowd, but I fail to see what relevance it has here either way. How about we tackle the issue at hand instead of pointing the blame elsewhere and avoiding accountability?
As for Potemkin_Prod, I have indeed seen the first acts of Exeter, and elsewhere I've said that if they produced episodes once a year with the quality of those segments, they would clearly be praised by me as one of the best fan film groups out there.
So what? Essentially, you're saying if Exeter cranked out shows at the rate New Voyages does, you would be praising them. Again, I ask, so what? How does that explain, excuse, or justify your initial comment, which was stated in a way that implied that to you, Exeter would never be finished, and because of that it wasn't good enough to acknowledge?
All I was trying to say was to be a little more careful in how you broach that subject, because like it or not Randy, you are (self-appointed or not) a voice in the fan film community and one people listen to. You may not be a journalist in the general sense of the word, but you do have a responsibility to get your facts straight. Often, you do not do this and it's one of the more frustrating parts of reading your reviews, honestly. This was another occasion where same occurred.
I doubt I'm the only one taking "potshots" at Exeter. Isn't there a whole thread for that elsewhere in the Fan Productions board?
What does this have to do with anything?
If and when the Exeter completes its second adventure, I'll be glad to re-view the earlier acts and watch the conclusion with great anticipation that's built up over the past few years. If not, it'll be one of those things that we all wish had been completed.
Swell.
I doubt I'm the only one taking "potshots" at Exeter.
That's irrelevant. You are supposed to be a journalist, of sorts, since you have an on-line feature that promotes fan films. Your posts here should reflect an objectivity that is not demanded of regular posters, and sadly, they don't.
So I'm a journalist "of sorts," which means everything I say is supposed to have "objectivity" when everybody can take as many "potshots" as they like and don't have you grumbling about that? As my favorite starship captain would say, "Everybody's human."
Again, in your role as a fan film reviewer, some posters may view your words differently than you might think. It's disingenuous of you to just shrug off the responsibility because suddenly you realize you can't make "pot-shots" at other productions. In short - you can't have it both ways. If you want to be able to call other people out, great. Just back your assertions up with facts. If you want to be the go-to resource for fan films, you sort of have to elevate yourself above being just a regular poster and be the objective writer, even if you're going to be subjective viewer.
And I had no idea there were so many patient people who say not to refer to Exeter when discussing the fact that it hasn't come out in years.
Once again you are completely missing the point. Firstly, the above paragraph makes no sense. How can one discuss the fact that it [Exeter] hasn't come out in years without referring to it?
Secondly, again, my point was simply that your post was worded in a way that was misleading, and that if you want to be viewed as the paragon of all things fan film, you should probably take more care to check your facts. That's all.
About 18 months ago, I heard from a couple of reliable sources that the final act of Exeter was going to be released in time for the J.J. Abrams' Star Trek film. So let's just say they're a "tad" off schedule.
So what? They've been --admittedly, by all involved, in every communication thus far-- off schedule. The way you told it though, it sounded as if you, who review the fan films and who some might believe have clout and connection to the various productions, would know and be able to comment as fact that it would never be done. Obviously, this was not the case which is why I made my initial comments.
Humor. It is a difficult concept. It is not logical....
Randy, this little blow-off comment wasn't funny the first, second, or third time you used it in recent discussions. It's not funny now. And even if your response were funny, (which is what I'm assuming you mean when you quote Saavik like that) it still wouldn't be very helpful in understanding your puzzling response.