• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

"I like the new movie better..."

The internal contradictions, logical holes and inconsistencies of Abrams's version of Star Trek are no greater than oldTrek - and certainly no sillier than TOS.

And ST:TMP is downright nonsensical. As one example, Harlan Ellison may have been the first person to mention in print - in 1980 - how ridiculous the premise is that a machine civilization capable of interpreting Voyager 6's simple programming into an elaborate imperative to learn everything, and then capable of building the most huge and advanced space vehicle we've ever seen, would have stumbled over correctly reading the device's name. That happens for one reason, and one reason only - in the hope that the audience will be surprised by the reveal. There is no possible internal justification for it that isn't stupid.
 
Forget V'ger, someone explain to me how Khan, supposedly a genetically enhanced superman genius, forgets that space is three-dimensional? And how the death of that meek little woman Marla MacGivers somehow drives Khan's quest for vengeance? That the Genesis bomb (something that belongs in a Harry Potter film) somehow makes a planet out of Nebula gas?

I love all the Trek films (even the bad ones) but anyone who thinks the old films hold up better than the new one under any kind of scrutiny are on something.
 
Forget V'ger, someone explain to me how Khan, supposedly a genetically enhanced superman genius, forgets that space is three-dimensional? And how the death of that meek little woman Marla MacGivers somehow drives Khan's quest for vengeance? That the Genesis bomb (something that belongs in a Harry Potter film) somehow makes a planet out of Nebula gas?

Well, Khan had very limited experience with space battles so his error is less out of character than you think. Plus, if I had to spend 15 years of my life in Weston super Mare I'd be ready to kill the man that marooned me there.

Genesis worked because of 'proto-matter' - that wibbly wobbly stuff David sneaked into the experiments while his Mum was drunk on her twelfth gin and tonic and crying over a old pic of Kirk in a ripped top (we've all done it).

Actually I don't mind if they make up non-sensical fictional science as long as they don't go overboard on the technobabble and as long as somebody remembers the rules later on. I find the mis-use of the supernova in NuTrek to be more of an insult to my brainpan.

As for the V'ger thing - why can't machine life forms share a love of Graffiti with Banksy? V'ger was just a roboteen's bedroom experiment gone wrong. It happens.
 
And ST:TMP is downright nonsensical. As one example, Harlan Ellison may have been the first person to mention in print - in 1980 - how ridiculous the premise is that a machine civilization capable of interpreting Voyager 6's simple programming into an elaborate imperative to learn everything, and then capable of building the most huge and advanced space vehicle we've ever seen, would have stumbled over correctly reading the device's name. That happens for one reason, and one reason only - in the hope that the audience will be surprised by the reveal. There is no possible internal justification for it that isn't stupid.

Uh ... whoever said the super-advanced civilization that named V'ger "... stumbled over correctly reading the device's name" in the first place? They read the original name even with the space dust, decided the obstructions on the identification plaque coincidentally gave the new machine a unique identity that still reflected its origin, and moved on. A mentality that said, "The original probe was Voyager VI, but we have re-designated it V'Ger to distinguish it from the original, simpler device."

I never thought the machine creators were that dumb.
 
And ST:TMP is downright nonsensical. As one example, Harlan Ellison may have been the first person to mention in print - in 1980 - how ridiculous the premise is that a machine civilization capable of interpreting Voyager 6's simple programming into an elaborate imperative to learn everything, and then capable of building the most huge and advanced space vehicle we've ever seen, would have stumbled over correctly reading the device's name. That happens for one reason, and one reason only - in the hope that the audience will be surprised by the reveal. There is no possible internal justification for it that isn't stupid.

Uh ... whoever said the super-advanced civilization that named V'ger "... stumbled over correctly reading the device's name" in the first place? They read the original name even with the space dust, decided the obstructions on the identification plaque coincidentally gave the new machine a unique identity that still reflected its origin, and moved on. A mentality that said, "The original probe was Voyager VI, but we have re-designated it V'Ger to distinguish it from the original, simpler device."

I never thought the machine creators were that dumb.

I think there will always be problems portraying non-humanoid mentality on screen without baffling the less astute members of the audience, that's why Trek rarely bothers with non-humanoid characters and it's also what I loved about the Vorlons and Shadows in B5. I never thought that V'ger really was a child, it was just Spock's way of simplifying what he'd learned from the mind meld so that the meatbags, I mean carbon units, could understand.
 
Pauln6 said:
Well, Khan had very limited experience with space battles so this error is less out of character than you think.

No way. Space being 3D is absolute basic common sense. It's not something you learn or forget, it's as basic as it gets. Even if, by some impossibly stupid one-in-a-billion fluke he forgot (which would make a further joke of his "superior intellect"), Khan would have been reminded when he first had Reliant change course to intercept the Enterprise that this was not Space Invaders, and the controls consisted of more than "left", "right" and "fire".

And "protomatter" was the reason David got the Genesis effect to work at all, it doesn't explain how it made a planet out of nothing but (perhaps) Nebula gas. It was designed to turn a moon into a class-M planet, not create mass from nothingness.

A star exploding with very little warning in a universe where we've seen weapons and phenomena that can cause similar effects is nothing next to this. Really.
 
And ST:TMP is downright nonsensical. As one example, Harlan Ellison may have been the first person to mention in print - in 1980 - how ridiculous the premise is that a machine civilization capable of interpreting Voyager 6's simple programming into an elaborate imperative to learn everything, and then capable of building the most huge and advanced space vehicle we've ever seen, would have stumbled over correctly reading the device's name. That happens for one reason, and one reason only - in the hope that the audience will be surprised by the reveal. There is no possible internal justification for it that isn't stupid.

Uh ... whoever said the super-advanced civilization that named V'ger "... stumbled over correctly reading the device's name" in the first place? They read the original name even with the space dust, decided the obstructions on the identification plaque coincidentally gave the new machine a unique identity that still reflected its origin, and moved on. A mentality that said, "The original probe was Voyager VI, but we have re-designated it V'Ger to distinguish it from the original, simpler device."

I never thought the machine creators were that dumb.

I think there will always be problems portraying non-humanoid mentality on screen without baffling the less astute members of the audience, that's why Trek rarely bothers with non-humanoid characters and it's also what I loved about the Vorlons and Shadows in B5. I never thought that V'ger really was a child, it was just Spock's way of simplifying what he'd learned from the mind meld so that the meatbags, I mean carbon units, could understand.
Oh, I don't think Dennis, or Harlan for that matter, are in any way less astute. I think they're both deliberately twisting context and content in a snarky attempt to crank up over-protective fans of earlier films. Plus, an obvious shortcoming of Trek09 is its credulity-straining series of coincidences, along with weird motivations for the antagonist, inconsistent use of the red matter technology, and curious indolence of the Klingons while they sat on 24th century Romulan technology for 25 years and kept it convenient for Nero to retrieve when his wait was over. By pointing out or manufacturing deficiencies in the earlier films, such fans can feel better about NuTrek's glaring deficiencies.

It's weirder behavior than that elicited by the Star Wars vs. Star Trek crowd, since it's an intra-franchise rivalry. But maybe I'm putting too savage a face on affairs. Maybe we're all more like teenage brothers gathered around the dinner table, taunting and teasing each other with fraternal goodwill, and I should relax my grip on my steak knife whenever Dennis, Number6, Devon, et al post. Over-protective fans, Psion! Breathe in. Breathe out. Just picture them all naked and smile amiably.

You're right about alien mentalities. I never really got as much out of Babylon 5 as I'd hoped when JMS first started telling us about it back in the day when he visited GEnie with regular updates about his concept for a TV series. But the Vorlons were amazing. From their ships to Kosh, I just couldn't get enough of them. Absolutely brilliant execution!
 
^Dude, TOS contradicts way more from ENT than STXI does. Time travel, cloaking devices etc. It turned out that all that amazing stuff Kirk did "first" was just a retread of Captain Archer's adventures :p
:wtf: :guffaw: How the hell does TOS contradict ENT when the show was made thirty years before???
They contradict each other.
Actually they don't since they're not of the same continuity anyway.
 
Uh ... whoever said the super-advanced civilization that named V'ger "... stumbled over correctly reading the device's name" in the first place?

It's in the movie.

They read the original name even with the space dust, decided the obstructions on the identification plaque coincidentally gave the new machine a unique identity that still reflected its origin, and moved on. A mentality that said, "The original probe was Voyager VI, but we have re-designated it V'Ger to distinguish it from the original, simpler device."

Bullshit.

That's fannish excuse-making at its most lame. There's nothing in Abrams's movie that requires half the contortions to explain that one does. :lol:
 
Didn't Ellison also say something about the Decker merging with Ilia scene being the most "incendiary fuck" in the history of cinema? Or was that Asimov?.... Geez, getting older sucks.
 
Uh ... whoever said the super-advanced civilization that named V'ger "... stumbled over correctly reading the device's name" in the first place?

It's in the movie.
Um ... nope. You're probably getting confused by Kirk's reveal of the Voyager VI plaque. That's when Kirk figures out V'Ger's name is derived from "Voyager VI". It says nothing about the state of mind of the aliens who interpreted it and christened the re-invented probe.

They read the original name even with the space dust, decided the obstructions on the identification plaque coincidentally gave the new machine a unique identity that still reflected its origin, and moved on. A mentality that said, "The original probe was Voyager VI, but we have re-designated it V'Ger to distinguish it from the original, simpler device."
Bullshit.

That's fannish excuse-making at its most lame. There's nothing in Abrams's movie that requires half the contortions to explain that one does. :lol:
Suuure, if you say so. Now at least go put on some underwear.
 
Either V'Ger's name was coincidentally identical to the visible letters on the smudged name-plate, or the aliens who built that impossible large starship just lacked the necessary thumb power to wipe off the space grime (or were just too fucking lazy).

Neither way makes a damn bit of sense.
 
Last edited:
Either V'Ger's name was coincidentally identical to the visible letters on the smudged name-plate, or that the aliens who built that impossible large starship just lacked the necessary thumb power to wipe off the space grime (or were just too fucking lazy).

Neither way makes a damn bit of sense.

Exactly. Psion's attempt to "explain" this is just unmitigated fan bullshit. Makes no sense at all. It's just a lousy, illogical and foolish script.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top