The wider issue for me is how shocking mediocre all of IDW's comics are.
It was alright by the last issue :P But yeah, I nearly gave up on that one, I really had to force myself to read the middle issues; which seems quite bad for something one pays for to enjoy :PThat last TNG series was particularly poor, em.. Ghosts?
It was alright by the last issue :P But yeah, I nearly gave up on that one, I really had to force myself to read the middle issues; which seems quite bad for something one pays for to enjoy :PThat last TNG series was particularly poor, em.. Ghosts?
And they won't as it is? We've had several people right in this very thread say (paraphrasing) "More of the same? Count me out..."
They're driving away people who are CURRENT readers by not giving them something fresh and exciting.
Not necessarily. The comics can't survive if only diehard ST comic book readers buy them. They need to be bought by members of the general public, who saw JJ's film, loved it, and are looking forward to its theatrical sequel. Such comic spin-offs will be the only version of ST propped up by pre-publicity for the next movie, and the shops love nothing more than a comic that comes with its own free publicity buzz.
This is the same thing that happened with Marvel comics under Jemas and Joey, it happened with nuGalactica, and now it's happening with Trek: the PTB are saying to the fans whose devotion and support MADE Trek the valuable franchise that it is in effect "We don't want you any more...we want the NEW fan...we want the 'mainstream' fan..."
Haven't they heard it's rude (and wrong) to not dance with the date who asked you to the ball?
The general public doesn't go in comic shops. And IDW's comics aren't available on the newsstands. IDW's trade paperbacks are available in bookstores (though my completely unscientific observation is that they're difficult to find on the shelf new, but they are common on the remainder tables), but trade sales are just gravy; if the comics don't sell in the first place, more comics aren't commissioned even if there's a market for the trades. So, Ian, it's diehard comic book readers who are also Star Trek fans that are buying IDW's output. And judging by what they've bought, TNG and DS9 aren't where it's at for them.The comics can't survive if only diehard ST comic book readers buy them. They need to be bought by members of the general public,
^They can't be said to be abandoning the TNG-era fans, since the fans aren't buying their TNG-era comics in sufficient numbers for them to be profitable. You can't "abandon" a group that's already gone away on its own.
I think the other problem is that their approach is out of step with modern comics publishing. They are stories where nothing of consequence happens and there is nothing to keep you reading. Now you can argue that nothing of consequence happens in comics like Batman or Superman, but they at least provide the illusion of change. Even most licensed properties (Buffy, Star Wars, Serenity, Angel etc) now have on-going series or arcs where we can see the characters in new situations, relationships etc.
I don't see anything like that from IDW (maybe it's the terms of their license?) and their 'lost episode' approach doesn't seem to appeal to most.
The general public doesn't go in comic shops.
Well, I can only speak for Australia but, here in Oz, a new local distributor, Wilkinson Publishing, has just bought the rights to distribute (reprint?) IDW trades in our regular bookshops:IDW's trade paperbacks are available in bookstores (though my completely unscientific observation is that they're difficult to find on the shelf new, but they are common on the remainder tables).
That's all well and good, but they should be servicing BOTH markets instead of making the "diehard" fanbase feel like they've been dumped.
I think the other problem is that their approach is out of step with modern comics publishing. They are stories where nothing of consequence happens and there is nothing to keep you reading. Now you can argue that nothing of consequence happens in comics like Batman or Superman, but they at least provide the illusion of change. Even most licensed properties (Buffy, Star Wars, Serenity, Angel etc) now have on-going series or arcs where we can see the characters in new situations, relationships etc.
I don't see anything like that from IDW (maybe it's the terms of their license?) and their 'lost episode' approach doesn't seem to appeal to most.
Buffy, Serenity, and Angel are being written by or under the auspices of the creative rights holder, who can approve dramatic shifts of the status quo. Star Wars mostly concerns itself with the EU, well away from anything that Lucas might be doing.
Trek, however, is firmly caught in the "protect the franchise" trap. The main characters have complete script immunity because of the property owner's desire to "not confuse" readers by allowing them to be killed or permanently changed in any way whatsoever.
That's why the EU is the way to go in Trek. Create NEW characters that don't have to be preserved for the sake of the "franchise". Hell, write a story where NONE of the characters we are introduced to at the beginning are still alive at the end of it.
That's why I prefer, frankly, Vanguard (and did prefer New Frontiers before Peter went off the rails stylistically)...there is legitimate risk, and therefore legitimate drama. I DON'T know what will happen to the heroes next, because they don't have script immunity.
I think the other problem is that their approach is out of step with modern comics publishing. They are stories where nothing of consequence happens and there is nothing to keep you reading. Now you can argue that nothing of consequence happens in comics like Batman or Superman, but they at least provide the illusion of change. Even most licensed properties (Buffy, Star Wars, Serenity, Angel etc) now have on-going series or arcs where we can see the characters in new situations, relationships etc.
I don't see anything like that from IDW (maybe it's the terms of their license?) and their 'lost episode' approach doesn't seem to appeal to most.
Trek, however, is firmly caught in the "protect the franchise" trap. The main characters have complete script immunity because of the property owner's desire to "not confuse" readers by allowing them to be killed or permanently changed in any way whatsoever.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.