• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Bond cancelled

No no, they will sell all the advertising and product placement and Bond will be like The Truman Show, with the Bond Girls stopping to thank pantene and trimspa before Bond pulls out a trojan and winks at the camera. Then there will be an explosion of fireworks that spells out 'K-Y'.

I agree a lack of budget forces folks to be creative with characters and story. My husband just saw Moon and really liked it. An sf film taking place on the moon for $5 mil. That's dang creative.
 
In the best possible scenario the current economy would force the business back to concentrating on the story and the actors instead of massive effects. But that's a pipe dream.

Hell, one of the best movies I've ever seen is "Twelve Angry Men" from the late 50's. And that whole movie practically consists of 12 character actors inside a single room.
 
I don't mean to antagonize, but I'm happy to hear this. I don't like the Craig Bond films at all, though I like Craig as an actor, and am hopeful that this may ultimately result in a more traditional - and less grim and generic - direction for the series.
 
In the best possible scenario the current economy would force the business back to concentrating on the story and the actors instead of massive effects. But that's a pipe dream.

Hell, one of the best movies I've ever seen is "Twelve Angry Men" from the late 50's. And that whole movie practically consists of 12 character actors inside a single room.

Well I don't know if Bond should ever really lose the spectacle. Hermiod is right, From Russia with Love is about as pared back as Bond ever gets, but never forget that Bond's very fist outing featured a villain with metal hands, his own secret nuclear powered base and his ability to topple rockets using radio waves...FRWL is a proper spy thriller, Dr No is a science fiction film. Goldfinger is probably somewhere inbetween, as is Thunderball, but then you've got You Only Live Twice and its all hollowed out volcanos and spaceships eating each other (and remember this is still Connery!)

I don't know, part of my likes the Craig films, but part of me misses the more ridiculous elements of 007's adventures. But that, for me at least, is the wonderful thing about the franchise and nearly 50 years worth of films. Some days I feel like gritty hand to hand fights in train carriages or Bond cradling Tracy's dead body, but other days I just wanna see Rog ski off a cliff and deploy a union jack parachute or have Brosnan use a tank in a car chase!

To be honest there's only about three Bond films I really dislike (one Connery, one Moore and one Brosnan) and I think every guy who's played the part did it well, even Lazenby.

Bond will return, maybe dark and gritty, maybe light and silly, but probably I'll enjoy it either way. I really was hoping for a more traditional Bond starring Craig though...
 
^From what's been said in interviews since QoS was released, I got the feeling they were trying to move it in that direction, too. Small steps, anyway, at least by re-introducing Moneypenny and Q.

Glad to see some love for Lazenby, too. :)
 
In the best possible scenario the current economy would force the business back to concentrating on the story and the actors instead of massive effects. But that's a pipe dream.

Hell, one of the best movies I've ever seen is "Twelve Angry Men" from the late 50's. And that whole movie practically consists of 12 character actors inside a single room.
If they remade 12 Angry Men today, it'd have a car chase.
"There's 12 of them... and they're ANGRY!"
 
I'd love to see a faithful TV series of the books, set in the 50s and so on. There's your dark and gritty!
 
In the best possible scenario the current economy would force the business back to concentrating on the story and the actors instead of massive effects. But that's a pipe dream.

Hell, one of the best movies I've ever seen is "Twelve Angry Men" from the late 50's. And that whole movie practically consists of 12 character actors inside a single room.
If they remade 12 Angry Men today, it'd have a car chase.
"There's 12 of them... and they're ANGRY!"
Probably.
There was another adaption of the play during the late 90's but I never watched that one.
 
In the best possible scenario the current economy would force the business back to concentrating on the story and the actors instead of massive effects. But that's a pipe dream.

Hell, one of the best movies I've ever seen is "Twelve Angry Men" from the late 50's. And that whole movie practically consists of 12 character actors inside a single room.
If they remade 12 Angry Men today, it'd have a car chase.
"There's 12 of them... and they're ANGRY!"
Probably.
There was another adaption of the play during the late 90's but I never watched that one.

There's also a recent Russian adaption of the play as well, called 12.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12_(film)
 
If they remade 12 Angry Men today, it'd have a car chase.
"There's 12 of them... and they're ANGRY!"
Probably.
There was another adaption of the play during the late 90's but I never watched that one.

There's also a recent Russian adaption of the play as well, called 12.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12_(film)
^^
Loved the Picket Fences episode where they used it for the A plot (the one where the sheriff had jury duty).
 
I vaguely remember an old Seventh Heaven episode in which the Reverend basically did the complete opposite of 12 Angry Men. He convinced everybody to vote guilty (the initial vote being not guilty 11 to 1--or something along those lines).
 
Didn't Sony buy MGM (and their huge catalog of movies and franchises) about five years go - as part of their big push for Blu Ray becoming number the dominant in-your-home medium?

Did it fall through? Was I dreaming?
 
Didn't Sony buy MGM (and their huge catalog of movies and franchises) about five years go - as part of their big push for Blu Ray becoming number the dominant in-your-home medium?

Did it fall through? Was I dreaming?


I think they own part of MGM, and they own the rights to the old movies but I don't think they bought current movie rights.
 
^From what's been said in interviews since QoS was released, I got the feeling they were trying to move it in that direction, too. Small steps, anyway, at least by re-introducing Moneypenny and Q.

Glad to see some love for Lazenby, too. :)

I would've enjoyed seeing the return of Moneypenny and Q. I wonder if they would've kept Cleese?
 
^From what's been said in interviews since QoS was released, I got the feeling they were trying to move it in that direction, too. Small steps, anyway, at least by re-introducing Moneypenny and Q.

Glad to see some love for Lazenby, too. :)

I would've enjoyed seeing the return of Moneypenny and Q. I wonder if they would've kept Cleese?

I doubt it, though I'm sure given his latest expensive divorce Cleese would have loved to come back.

I suspect they'd have brought him back in more of a straight Quartermaster role.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top