I liked the Silurian setting very much as well. I don't really know why people complain.
the physical set was fine, it was the CG environment that looked cheap, you know the first 30 seconds of the episode.
the physical set was fine, it was the CG environment that looked cheap, you know the first 30 seconds of the episode.
it was glaring to me.It's nothing glaring.)
What personalities?!? They were cyphers, nothing more. The angry military leader (with familial connections to the soldier us humans just killed, of course), the wise elder, the morally resolute scientist (who's totally fine with VIVISECTION btw, but lets just ignore that this episode). And all played their usual roles in this cliche ridden suckfest.And they actually had personalities. Imagine.
there was radiation he absorbed by the energy chamber of the Gate, that was cleary let out by the Doctor in the regeneration process, hence why it was half destroyed.I don't understand why people are saying because Ten regenerated in the TARDIS, that that would bang destroy it? The Doctor has regenerated in the TARDIS before.
Not the future of the linear universe, but the Doctor's future.After seeing the piece of shrapnel and your comment Checkmate I can't help but wonder about "The Big Bang" the Tenth's regeneration certainly was that and we really don't know WHEN the regeneration took place. We only assume that it was still in 2010 and then the Tardis crashes in 1996 or whenever it was when he meets Amelia. We only saw the interior of the explosion not the exterior until it was shown hovering towards Earth. As usual we'll be proven totally wrong.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.