What agenda? It's no secret to anybody in these parts that you hate
Star Trek 09. That's all well and good. Nothing is for everybody. You have the right to like and dislike whatever you want. But you're taking things a step further than not liking the new movie.
You're a writer on the new
Star Trek Concordance. As you know the
Concordance is highly respected and loved by the fan community. It was
essential material in the days when Trek was for all intents and purposes dead. By agreeing to write the new
Concordance you've attached yourself to a great legacy.
The new Concordance will also be bearing the name of Bjo Trimble. Bjo is a
key and beloved figure in Trek history and the fan community in general. Her name, reputation and opinions carry a ton of weight. By agreeing to write the new Concordance you've attached yourself to her legend.
That's where the problem is.
It seems that you're
not writing an objective reference book. You seem to be using this book as your soapbox to take the piss out on Trek 09. What's worse is you're riding on Bjo's coattails to legitimize your personal
opinion.
Don't even bother to deny it. It's obvious and I'm willing to bet most people here would agree with me.
If you were truly writing a reference book you would go to great lengths to make it as up to date and all encompassing as possible. If that meant adding more pages a pro would add the pages. They wouldn't turn in a half-assed product. They would base the new book on the standard of the old. You've decided to flush standards down the crapper and include only what you
want and fuck the rest.
Worst of all you're insulting the intelligence of the fan community (your target audience) and making excuses for excluding
relevant material from your "reference book". You've claimed it would add too many pages to the book. It's clear you've said this to avoid the appearance of bias which by the way is a year too late. Instead of looking unbiased you've made yourself look lazy and unprofessional. Why would anyone want to buy a reference book from someone unwilling to do the research and turn in an incomplete work?
From what I can tell the
Nu-Concordance appears to be
Bob's Abridged Guide to Star Trek. No thanks.
Memory Alpha and Beta is a
free and
comprehensive guide to Trek. I used it when I wrote for SNW. If I ever get any Trek work in the future that's what I'll be utilizing for reference.
If I were you I would look deep down into my heart and ask myself if taking a shot at JJ Abrams was worth pissing on Bjo Trimble's reputation for. Because that's what
Bob's Abridged Guide to Star Trek is doing to her. She gave you a job to do. Update the
Star Trek Concordance. Do it goddammit! 