Been re-watching many TNG episodes - first time I've watched them in nearly 10 years - and one theme keeps standing out to me: "Non-involvement" and "Non-interference" in the afairs of other races/nations.
Currently watching Ensign Ro, and I'm shocked that the Federation did very little to stop the Cardassians aggression and expansion in the early 2300's. Going to Memory Alpha the backstory almost sounds like an official policy of appeasement toward them.
Also, Picard meantions "Cowboy Diplomacy" when talking with Spock, basically insulting the work he had done in the 2200's. Although I very much like Picard as depicted in TNG, I wanted to punch him in the face for that. He seemed to arrogant and "more enlightened than thou".
Was the Federation simply happy that the Klingons had become a non-threat and the Romulans dissapeared behind the Neutral Zone? Was Picard a product of a naive and spoiled era?
Certainly there wasn't a metanarative in place by the writers (and TOS not even close to 'over' when TNG started), but I'm interested in all of your readings in the situation. Starfleet, and the Federation, seem like very different institutions than they were in the 23rd century. Reading the backstory before TNG keeps sounding like "what happened to Starfleet/Fedation?" - rolling over to avoid conflict - ala "What kind of Jedi are these??" (from YouTube's Confused Matthew's review of the Star Wars Prequels).
Currently watching Ensign Ro, and I'm shocked that the Federation did very little to stop the Cardassians aggression and expansion in the early 2300's. Going to Memory Alpha the backstory almost sounds like an official policy of appeasement toward them.
Also, Picard meantions "Cowboy Diplomacy" when talking with Spock, basically insulting the work he had done in the 2200's. Although I very much like Picard as depicted in TNG, I wanted to punch him in the face for that. He seemed to arrogant and "more enlightened than thou".
Was the Federation simply happy that the Klingons had become a non-threat and the Romulans dissapeared behind the Neutral Zone? Was Picard a product of a naive and spoiled era?
Certainly there wasn't a metanarative in place by the writers (and TOS not even close to 'over' when TNG started), but I'm interested in all of your readings in the situation. Starfleet, and the Federation, seem like very different institutions than they were in the 23rd century. Reading the backstory before TNG keeps sounding like "what happened to Starfleet/Fedation?" - rolling over to avoid conflict - ala "What kind of Jedi are these??" (from YouTube's Confused Matthew's review of the Star Wars Prequels).