What difference would they make?
So, let me get this straight: You say changing the name of a fictional weapon from photon torpedos to quantum torpedos would have changed the actual course of the series? What makes you think quantum torpedos are actually any better than photon torpedos (story-wise, that is)? I always thought they were just pieces of technobabble created to make the characters sound professional.If they'd had 5,000 quantum torpedoes in addition to all the other armaments of the station the Dominion probably wouldn't have taken DS9 for six months. That would've meant the entire course of history would have changed (see: Dukat). That's just the big one I can think of off the top of my head but the addition of better weaponry during any given moment in DS9's history would have likely changed things.What difference would they make?
So, let me get this straight: You say changing the name of a fictional weapon from photon torpedos to quantum torpedos would have changed the actual course of the series? What makes you think quantum torpedos are actually any better than photon torpedos (story-wise, that is)? I always thought they were just pieces of technobabble created to make the characters sound professional.
So, let me get this straight: You say changing the name of a fictional weapon from photon torpedos to quantum torpedos would have changed the actual course of the series? What makes you think quantum torpedos are actually any better than photon torpedos (story-wise, that is)? I always thought they were just pieces of technobabble created to make the characters sound professional.If they'd had 5,000 quantum torpedoes in addition to all the other armaments of the station the Dominion probably wouldn't have taken DS9 for six months. That would've meant the entire course of history would have changed (see: Dukat). That's just the big one I can think of off the top of my head but the addition of better weaponry during any given moment in DS9's history would have likely changed things.What difference would they make?
No, that's not what I thought at all. In-universe quantum torpedos are supposed to be better; I get that. But what difference do they actually make story-wise? It's just a different name and a slightly different special effect. The writers could write a story where a ship is destroyed by one photon torpedo. The next week they could write a story where a ship of the same type is destroyed by twenty quantum torpedos. They're just ficitonal weapons doing whatever a writer wants them to do. That's why I don't see the point in speculating how the actual course of the show would have changed if they had weapons with a different name. That's all.Let me get this straight: you were under the impression that photon torpedoes and quantum torpedoes did the same amount of damage? That, in-universe, they just changed the color and the name of the photon torpedo for no purpose other than to "sound professional?"So, let me get this straight: You say changing the name of a fictional weapon from photon torpedos to quantum torpedos would have changed the actual course of the series? What makes you think quantum torpedos are actually any better than photon torpedos (story-wise, that is)? I always thought they were just pieces of technobabble created to make the characters sound professional.
So, let me get this straight: You say changing the name of a fictional weapon from photon torpedos to quantum torpedos would have changed the actual course of the series? What makes you think quantum torpedos are actually any better than photon torpedos (story-wise, that is)? I always thought they were just pieces of technobabble created to make the characters sound professional.
Let me get this straight: you were under the impression that photon torpedoes and quantum torpedoes did the same amount of damage? That, in-universe, they just changed the color and the name of the photon torpedo for no purpose other than to "sound professional?"
-Withers-
No, that's not what I thought at all. In-universe quantum torpedos are supposed to be better; I get that. But what difference do they actually make story-wise? It's just a different name and a slightly different special effect. The writers could write a story where a ship is destroyed by one photon torpedo. The next week they could write a story where a ship of the same type is destroyed by twenty quantum torpedos. They're just ficitonal weapons doing whatever a writer wants them to do. That's why I don't see the point in speculating how the actual course of the show would have changed if they had weapons with a different name. That's all.Let me get this straight: you were under the impression that photon torpedoes and quantum torpedoes did the same amount of damage? That, in-universe, they just changed the color and the name of the photon torpedo for no purpose other than to "sound professional?"So, let me get this straight: You say changing the name of a fictional weapon from photon torpedos to quantum torpedos would have changed the actual course of the series? What makes you think quantum torpedos are actually any better than photon torpedos (story-wise, that is)? I always thought they were just pieces of technobabble created to make the characters sound professional.
It was always going to be a losing battle, no matter how many maxi-death-hyper-neutron-blaster-uber-howitzers that Starfleet equipped the station with. The Dominion had numerical superiority, and had thousands of smaller attack ships. They were simply over-whelmed.
I doubt giving DS9 quantum torpedoes would have made a difference in the battle. In fact quantum torpedoes did not seem that much more effective in DS9. If you take the battle we saw photon torpedoes destroying Jem'Hadar attack ships in three hits. In "Valiant" and "Siege of AR-558" we saw four quantum torpedoes used to destroy the same type of vessel, might only take three but the Defiant always fired its weapons systems in tandem. You never see just one of the launchers fire or just not of the phaser cannons.
As for the Breen warship, I'd question using it as a yardstick for the Jem'Hadar battle cruiser. It looked to be twice the size of the Defiant in that episode but later it was appeared to be not much larger.
^Never liked it. If a torpedo penetrated, they should destroy the entire ship, unless for some reason, future weapons use sub-kiloton* yields. Starships should not be 19th century sailing vessels, and Trek battles should not be fought with cannonballs.
One angle could be the Provisional Government forbid it since it was federation technology and they still were not a member of UFP which in turn made Sisko's mission a failure.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.