• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

James Cameron's "Avatar" (grading and discussion)

Grade "Avatar"

  • Excellent

    Votes: 166 50.0%
  • Above Average

    Votes: 85 25.6%
  • Average

    Votes: 51 15.4%
  • Below Average

    Votes: 11 3.3%
  • Terrible

    Votes: 19 5.7%

  • Total voters
    332
I know laser weapons are a cliche and sci-fi, but something different than porokectile weapons would've been nice to see in this 22nd century set movie.

The Pandorapedia and other sources (like the Human Hardware video featurette) make it clear that the intense magnetic fields on Pandora make it necessary to use relatively low-tech weapons and machines.

They are also limited by what the can manufacture on-site. Since the starships only can bring 330 metric tons of cargo per trip, almost all of their machinery is built by generic fabrication facilities using locally mined resources. The Samson and Scorpion gunships are about the maximum level of technology that they can manufacture on-site.

The Samson and Scorpion gunships have long been abandoned on Earth - where much more advanced tech and weapons are available.
 
Box Office Mojo has Avatar at 25.2 million for New Years Day so it's at just over 309 million after 15 days, WOW.

Since so many people were comparing it to Dune(1984), I re-watched it recently, a great movie with some good actors.
Patrick Stewart before he was Picard is awesome too.

Dune, Dances with Wolves, The Last Samurai all have a similar theme and since I like them all and can re-watch them no problem without getting bored, the excuse that Avatar has a used plot doesn't matter one bit to me. In my opinion it doesn't hurt this movie at all.
I guess if you don't really like those types of movies then the plot wouldn't really appeal to you. Either that or you are just tired of that plot type of movie.
 
I know laser weapons are a cliche and sci-fi, but something different than porokectile weapons would've been nice to see in this 22nd century set movie.

Firearms in some form have been in use upwards of 900 years now, and I doubt the next 150 is going to change that completely. Energy weapons will be more widespread on the battlefield certainly, but I still think the standard weapon carried by the soldier on the ground will be a firearm - albeit a much more advanced one than we use today.

I think overall it is better to stick with projectile weapons visually. To use lasers and so on tends to "soften" the portrayal of military forces which for a film like Avatar would really not work.
 
Did...did we see the same movie? :wtf:

Presumably we've both seen Avatar, but I'm not sure that we've both seen environmentalists vs. industry movies. The latter seem to feature a hero (journalist, lawyer, decent hardworking government official) who is confronted with either a wild eyed poor person claiming they or their loved ones were poisoned by pollution, or by a crime committed to cover up the pollution. And the movie basically ends when the proof of the pollution is presented in the proper venue, a court, or the news media, or the proper authorities.

The last one I saw was Silver City, where Chris Cooper snags a dead body killed in the pollution coverup. The one before that I think was I Witness, with pollution in Mexico, which also started with bodies killed to cover up the pollution. And, going back to another movie with mystic Indian stuff, Thunderheart, that wasn't just mystic Indian stuff, it was, wait for it, about a pollution coverup. And it ended with the public exposure of the pollution. No coverup in Avatar, therefore a cliche of environmentalists vs. industry movies left unused.
 
I know laser weapons are a cliche and sci-fi, but something different than porokectile weapons would've been nice to see in this 22nd century set movie.

The Pandorapedia and other sources (like the Human Hardware video featurette) make it clear that the intense magnetic fields on Pandora make it necessary to use relatively low-tech weapons and machines.

They are also limited by what the can manufacture on-site. Since the starships only can bring 330 metric tons of cargo per trip, almost all of their machinery is built by generic fabrication facilities using locally mined resources. The Samson and Scorpion gunships are about the maximum level of technology that they can manufacture on-site.

The Samson and Scorpion gunships have long been abandoned on Earth - where much more advanced tech and weapons are available.


interesting premise... they then had the capability to fix, rearm and remanufacture more ammo.
maybe even manufacture minor weapons.
 
Did...did we see the same movie? :wtf:

Presumably we've both seen Avatar, but I'm not sure that we've both seen environmentalists vs. industry movies. The latter seem to feature a hero (journalist, lawyer, decent hardworking government official) who is confronted with either a wild eyed poor person claiming they or their loved ones were poisoned by pollution, or by a crime committed to cover up the pollution. And the movie basically ends when the proof of the pollution is presented in the proper venue, a court, or the news media, or the proper authorities.

The last one I saw was Silver City, where Chris Cooper snags a dead body killed in the pollution coverup. The one before that I think was I Witness, with pollution in Mexico, which also started with bodies killed to cover up the pollution. And, going back to another movie with mystic Indian stuff, Thunderheart, that wasn't just mystic Indian stuff, it was, wait for it, about a pollution coverup. And it ended with the public exposure of the pollution. No coverup in Avatar, therefore a cliche of environmentalists vs. industry movies left unused.

Another movie that comes to mind that fits that trope would be the Travolta vehicle A Civic Action. Since my parents, both environmental engineers, found it laughable, I haven't bothered to return to it, but my vague memories of the plot fit the formula you've outlined.
 
Are there any cliches about environmentalism vs industry, colonialism and multinational corporations, cowboys vs indians that were not used in this movie?

Of course there are.

Environmentalism vs. industry movies seem like they are always centered around the struggle to reveal the dastardly effects of industrial contamination, none of which is a part of Avatar.

Did...did we see the same movie? :wtf:

I didn't have a problem with the moral of the movie. Just the heavy-handed, uninteresting storytelling. All that was missing was a shot of the chief with a tear rolling down his cheek as he looks at trash left behind by RDA Corp.

Pretty good sum up of this movie.

My other biggest problem is the...lack of any acting. There was absolutely no acting in this movie.
 
My other biggest problem is the...lack of any acting. There was absolutely no acting in this movie.

So it was a documentary on 10 foot tall blue aliens and the men who love them?

Don't feed the troll, Locotus. ;)
Thespeckledkiwi has a history of making absurd points in this thread. :D (such as no story, no conflict, no drama, and now no acting) He's just bored again.
 
http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/

Code:
[URL="http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/new-years-day-another-big-avatar-payday-the-blind-side-crosses-200m-domestic/"]CAMERON'S BILLION DOLLAR BABY! 'Avatar' [/URL]
[URL="http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/new-years-day-another-big-avatar-payday-the-blind-side-crosses-200m-domestic/"]Passes $1B Worldwide And $350M Domestic After Only [/URL]
[URL="http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/new-years-day-another-big-avatar-payday-the-blind-side-crosses-200m-domestic/"]17 Days In Release[/URL]

By [URL="http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/"]Nikki Finke[/URL] | Category: [URL="http://www.deadline.com/category/uncategorized"]Uncategorized[/URL] | 
Saturday January 2, 2010 @ 10:15pm

SATURDAY PM/SUNDAY AM UPDATE: My sources say 
early numbers show  Avatar's projected North 
American cume, after only 17 days in release from 
20th Century Fox, will be $350.5 million. And its 
worldwide box office figure should be $1.05 billion 
coming out of this weekend. Yikes! Then again, 
James Cameron's big budget technopic was helped 
by higher 3D ticket prices. As a Fox exec just 
gushed to me: "Mr. Cameron was king of the 
world but now has dominion over the universe. 
And he will own the top two slots on the worldwide 
all-time box office list!"
 
My other biggest problem is the...lack of any acting. There was absolutely no acting in this movie.

So it was a documentary on 10 foot tall blue aliens and the men who love them?

Don't feed the troll, Locotus. ;)
Thespeckledkiwi has a history of making absurd points in this thread. :D (such as no story, no conflict, no drama, and now no acting) He's just bored again.

So, basically... there was no movie.
 
Don't feed the troll, Locotus. ;)
Thespeckledkiwi has a history of making absurd points in this thread. :D (such as no story, no conflict, no drama, and now no acting) He's just bored again.

Tsk, tsk .....that's why God made moderators, so it's best to leave such investigations to them. ;)
 
Another movie that comes to mind that fits that trope would be the Travolta vehicle A Civic Action. Since my parents, both environmental engineers, found it laughable, I haven't bothered to return to it, but my vague memories of the plot fit the formula you've outlined.

Yes, that's another one. Again, the point is that it simply isn't true that Avatar leaves no cliche unused. Galleywest may have meant to be hyperbolic, I suppose.
And the rebuttal is over literal.

But, consider the people in the thread who changed the movie in their reviews, saying Jake the white guy saved the Indians, so they can argue the movie is racist. Since Eywa's magical intervention clearly saves the day, the only valid criticism of Avatar is that is arbitrarily (i.e., uses really crap fictional science) posits a Religion That Works.

Except, not only is religion deemed off limits for polite criticism, it is unlikely that it is the aspect that is "boring" or offensive.

Also, the most blatantly racist thing in the movie is the insane claim that the soldiers while on Earth were fighters for freedom. But no one even appeared to notice, much less object!

So, sorry folks, I don't think clubbing with facts the claim that Avatar left unused no cliche from "environmentalist vs. industry" movies is overkill.
 
The fact that Avatar is so successful is just mind-blowing. James Cameron must feel pretty awesome right about now.
 
Going by his track record, it'd have to be with Zoe or Sigourney, though, not his wife. Or CCH Pounder. :wtf:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top