I didn't mean that pairing. I know this is the geek position but romance really doesn't enhance science fiction unless it's done very well. I was always narked by the 'sudden true love' stories which were forgotten next episode. The very few occasions when it was explicitly merely sex (on Raisa for example) were refreshing.
At the risk of dragging this thread off track, WHY do so many people oppose romance in SF? I think it adds layers to the characterizations ... I cared about Paris and Torres a lot more together than I did separately. Everything that happened to one of them made me think of how the other was feeling, and vice versa. It made them more complex and interesting. Trek in particular has a way of reducing people to stereotypes, and I think the romances and hints of romance helped mitigate that somewhat, at least when they were romances that made some sense.
I think I'm pretty much in agreement with Deckerd. I don't oppose romance in scifi, but I oppose badly done romance in any genre, and scifi is generally not good at romance. For that matter,
television is generally not good at it.
Paris and Torres was great. I also like Worf and Dax - and I thought the O'Briens were interesting too. But look at how rare romances of that caliber are. The fact that good ones are so rare is one of the things that makes me resistant to inclusion of romance in a show I like with characters I like. I don't like to see either one misused, and history tells me that if the Trek PTB attempt a romance, they will almost always screw it up.
Romance
ought to enhance the characterization. It almost never does, at least not in TV. Often, in fact, it actually detracts from the characters. Romances-of-the-week almost always detract from the character, for example. There are exceptions, of course (TNG's "Lessons" comes to mind), but generally, they tell us a lot more about how willing the writers are to manipulate a character for the sake of a plot than they do about the character itself.
Long-term romances that never go anywhere sometimes detract from the character, too - and I'm thinking here particularly of Picard/Crusher and Troi/Riker. Yes, I know the former finally went somewhere in the books and the latter in the movies, but that doesn't count - they had seven freakin' years on the show and they did nothing except use those supposed "romances" when they were convenient, only to forget them the moment they were inconvenient. The fact that Troi was supposed to be Riker's Own True Love didn't prevent him from falling in love with somebody if the plot demanded it, did it? And ditto (
double ditto) for Troi.