• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

State-run health care

Status
Not open for further replies.
Btw. I always have to laugh when one of you guys says something like "real Americans" as opposed to apparently fake Americans.

What do actual anti-American people hate most about America, what did al-qaeda think was the most prominent symbol of the USA? Bumfuck, Idaho or the capital of east coast-liberal elitism - New York City, New York?

Last time I checked, I was a "real" American. Probably more real than most here can claim, as my family dates back to the late 1600's, and I have some Native American ancestry (a tiny amount, but it's there). So there. :p

I didn't know that liberals weren't real Americans. Guess I need to move to the ever so socialist Canada! :guffaw:

They're not real Americans in the sense that they seek to controvert and change the founding principles of our nation. Maybe they're AINO's?
You really just posted that liberals are not real Americans? In an already high-maintenance MISC thread? Nice.
 
Last time I checked, I was a "real" American. Probably more real than most here can claim, as my family dates back to the late 1600's, and I have some Native American ancestry (a tiny amount, but it's there). So there. :p

I didn't know that liberals weren't real Americans. Guess I need to move to the ever so socialist Canada! :guffaw:

They're not real Americans in the sense that they seek to controvert and change the founding principles of our nation. Maybe they're AINO's?
You really just posted that liberals are not real Americans? In an already high-maintenance MISC thread? Nice.

What is wrong with pointing that out? Of course they're ACTUAL Americans. It's simply that their ideology runs counter to that of our founders. Small government, self-reliance, self-determination, etc. Relax.
 
the most damning indictment of the state of American health care was when a charity called 'Remote Area Medical' recently did free clinics in California doing all sorts like dental check-ups, mammograms, MRIs and what have you and they had 800 people in ONE DAY.

in fact, here's the results from http://www.ramusa.org/ of the Inglewood clinics:

RAM LA Results

The following totals are from patient records in hand and, due to an unknown number of misplaced papers and lost data, are lower than actual numbers.

6,344 patients registered for 14,561 patient encounters (approximately 2.3 services per patient)

3,827 volunteers, largely non-medical support (It is believed that patient encounters could have doubled if medical professionals licensed in states other than California had been allowed to volunteer their services at this clinic.)

3,182 dental patients – 2, 274 teeth extracted and 5,438 teeth saved, 1,889 cleanings

2,266 vision care patients with 1,984 pairs of prescription eyeglasses made on site and fitted

8,775 general medical visits

Total value of care: $2,821,383

The Remote Area Medical® (RAM) Volunteer Corps is a non-profit, volunteer, airborne relief corps dedicated to serving mankind by providing free health care, dental care, eye care, veterinary services, and technical and educational assistance to people in remote areas of the United States and the world.
Founded in 1985, Remote Area Medical® is a publicly supported all-volunteer charitable organization. Volunteer doctors, nurses, pilots, veterinarians and support workers participate in expeditions (at their own expense) in some of the world's most exciting places. Medical supplies, medicines, facilities and vehicles are donated.
 
BTW:

Schools (K-12) are mainly maintained by state and federal income. Why are we paying for some other kid's education?

Blackwater, I don't even want to really get into this but where is all the crying about how we are wasting our tax payer dollars on these morons?

Roads were brought up as well.

there are a TON of stuff we pay for that we use or is being wasted. Health care isn't that big of a deal for a nation that is suffering from so much personal debt due to these medical costs.
 
What is wrong with pointing that out? Of course they're ACTUAL Americans. It's simply that their ideology runs counter to that of our founders. Small government, self-reliance, self-determination, etc. Relax.

Their ideology also included keeping slaves and preventing women from voting.
 
They're not real Americans in the sense that they seek to controvert and change the founding principles of our nation. Maybe they're AINO's?
You really just posted that liberals are not real Americans? In an already high-maintenance MISC thread? Nice.

What is wrong with pointing that out? Of course they're ACTUAL Americans. It's simply that their ideology runs counter to that of our founders. Small government, self-reliance, self-determination, etc. Relax.
It's SIMPLY that combined with your history, that inflammatory comment is easily interpreted as trolling - and I'm SURE that you don't want anyone to think THAT. :guffaw:
 
What is wrong with pointing that out? Of course they're ACTUAL Americans. It's simply that their ideology runs counter to that of our founders. Small government, self-reliance, self-determination, etc. Relax.

Their ideology also included keeping slaves and preventing women from voting.

Also wiping out Native Americans. And the fact that some of their ideologies ran counter to what they were doing.
 
They're not real Americans in the sense that they seek to controvert and change the founding principles of our nation. Maybe they're AINO's?
You really just posted that liberals are not real Americans? In an already high-maintenance MISC thread? Nice.

What is wrong with pointing that out? Of course they're ACTUAL Americans. It's simply that their ideology runs counter to that of our founders. Small government, self-reliance, self-determination, etc. Relax.

Is it worth me pointing out that people living 200 years ago are rarely appropriate ideological role models? Regardless of whether the proposed changes do differ from the ideological standards of your forebears or not- and I'm not going to offer a conclusion to that- ideologies change, and they should change, otherwise what you end up with is ridiculous conservatism that holds your nation back from the prosperity it could be enjoying. I mean, I'm British. If I based my ideological standards on what my forebears were up to 200 years ago, I'd be an imperialist.

And AGAIN: You have compulsary military registration for your young males. Self-determination? No.
 
there are a TON of stuff we pay for that we use or is being wasted. Health care isn't that big of a deal for a nation that is suffering from so much personal debt due to these medical costs.

I agree. I think it's past time we figured out a way to keep middle and lower class Americans from having to declare bankruptcy or go without when the health care they needs exceeds their paltry incomes.
 
Oh BTW! I forgot to mention:

A lot of companies don't also offer health care to any dependents or husband/wives. So you might have good health care but your family does not.
 
They're not real Americans in the sense that they seek to controvert and change the founding principles of our nation. Maybe they're AINO's?
You really just posted that liberals are not real Americans? In an already high-maintenance MISC thread? Nice.

What is wrong with pointing that out? Of course they're ACTUAL Americans. It's simply that their ideology runs counter to that of our founders. Small government, self-reliance, self-determination, etc. Relax.

Well, you're wrong for one, that would be the most obvious problem. And if you think the Founders would support you slagging people off because they don't share the same viewpoint as you... well, I'd suggest a history class.
 
They're not real Americans in the sense that they seek to controvert and change the founding principles of our nation. Maybe they're AINO's?
You really just posted that liberals are not real Americans? In an already high-maintenance MISC thread? Nice.

What is wrong with pointing that out? Of course they're ACTUAL Americans. It's simply that their ideology runs counter to that of our founders. Small government, self-reliance, self-determination, etc. Relax.

Slave-owning, no one could vote unless you were a white, land-owning, man.

Yeah. Good times. Why can't we get back to those good old days?
 
Not worth it, Squigs. You'll just go around in circles with this mook. Just enjoy your weekend. :)
 
Is it worth me pointing out that people living 200 years ago are rarely appropriate ideological role models? Regardless of whether the proposed changes do differ from the ideological standards of your forebears or not- and I'm not going to offer a conclusion to that- ideologies change, and they should change, otherwise what you end up with is ridiculous conservatism that holds your nation back from the prosperity it could be enjoying.
Actually, I don't that is a problem for poeple that think like TheLonelySquire. I'm sure he will agree with me.
 
That's where churches and charities do some of their great work. Those would be a great places for progressives to send their contributions.

That's a horrible and completely unrealistic idea.
It's a great and realistic idea. It has the advantage of having worked in the past.

Actually no. Everyone has access to emergency health care.

And the problem with people only having access to emergency care is twofold: firstly, emergency care is more expensive then preventative care and secondly when people can't pay their bills for emergency care the cost overruns get passed on to everyone else. In fact, this is one of the primary reasons why health care in the US is more expensive per captia then every single other country in the world... the over-reliance on emergency care due to a lack of access for proper consistent care over time.

If someone needs more than that they can get a job that has health care or visit a charity or church that can help them with the expenses.
You basically ignored what I wrote, which is that people get denied coverage from their employer based providers because of pre-existing conditions. That is an absolute fact and there are people on this board who are in that unfortunate boat. When those people's problems get severe enough, sure, they'll get emergency care (assuming they make it to the hospital before death) and you'll wind up paying for it anyway... and it will be much more expensive for everyone as a result.

Which is why no insurance is a better idea.

Massachusetts doesn't have pre-existing conditions. Yes it makes insurance more expensive but it shows that having your lawmakers make it a law is better than people sitting on the couch kvetching. And it's a lot less intrusive then having the government grow and become 100 times more intrusive than the Patriot Act could ever be or being forced to buy insurance or go to jail...

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUkzV8h3Wp0[/yt]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top