Ellison settles lawsuit!
http://www.trektoday.com/content/2009/10/ellison-star-trek-lawsuit-settled/
http://www.trektoday.com/content/2009/10/ellison-star-trek-lawsuit-settled/
Ellison settles lawsuit!
http://www.trektoday.com/content/2009/10/ellison-star-trek-lawsuit-settled/
In we have that hardcover omnibus of the Crucible series, please?![]()
wonder what this means for ST XII? Fed team discovers it, Klingons want to take it over, Enterprise called in to protect???
wonder what this means for ST XII? Fed team discovers it, Klingons want to take it over, Enterprise called in to protect???
And where are you getting that unlikely revelation?
Considering that Ellison wanted damages of one dollar, I can't imagine that Ellison's cut, if he's even entitled to one, would derail a potential collection of Crucible.Well... now it probably has to sell well enough for Ellison to get a cut, too.In we have that hardcover omnibus of the Crucible series, please?![]()
![]()
![]()
Considering that Ellison wanted damages of one dollar, I can't imagine that Ellison's cut, if he's even entitled to one, would derail a potential collection of Crucible.
Well, the carefully-worded statement is still to come.Ellison’s lawyer, John H. Carmichael, said at the time “Writers under that WGA agreement are supposed to get 25% of the revenue from the licensing of publication rights.”
The article mentions:
Well, the carefully-worded statement is still to come.Ellison’s lawyer, John H. Carmichael, said at the time “Writers under that WGA agreement are supposed to get 25% of the revenue from the licensing of publication rights.”
Given that Pocket is owned by CBS, it'll be interesting to hear what they defined as "revenue" from the *rights* - since they're part of the same company you'd think they could have gone for the stance that there's purely an internal transfer...
No, I kind of get what they're driving at. Saying that in future, if a story calls for the Guardian of Forever... Probably only a production with money to burn, like a JJ Abrams film can possibly afford what Ellison considers fair.wonder what this means for ST XII? Fed team discovers it, Klingons want to take it over, Enterprise called in to protect???
And where are you getting that unlikely revelation?
Yeah, that's news to me as well.
![]()
Probably only a production with money to burn, like a JJ Abrams film can probably afford what Ellison considers fair.
Heh. Not wanting to bring anything even resembling time-travel into a sequel, means that pole is probably being held from several miles away too actually.Considering the way Ellison overreacted to Peter David mentioning a fan rumour that the Guardian was slated to appear in ST XI, I think JJ and ST XII will avoid a remake of "City on the Edge..." with a barge pole.
I'm definitely in that camp. The storytelling slate has been wiped clean, and everyone can start fresh. Doing something "for the fans" is a sure way to lose the gains that 2009 brought. IMHO, YMMV, all that jazz.Personally, I hope they shy away from introducing "nuTrekified" versions of stories and plot elements we already know.
I'm of the opinion that a great many of the threats that the Federation faced in the 2250s-2270s -- like the Doomsday Machine, like Vejur, like Khan -- won't happen.Certain external events theoretically would still happen in this new timeline (the Doomsday Machine, for example), but that's years away -- so far as the chronology is concerned -- and nothing says this Enterprise will be the ship to face off against such obstacles.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.