A
Amaris
Guest
I agree that it's sick making things like this public, but the fact remains that someone with testes instead of ovaries can't really be considered truly female.
Why not?
J.
I agree that it's sick making things like this public, but the fact remains that someone with testes instead of ovaries can't really be considered truly female.
I agree that it's sick making things like this public, but the fact remains that someone with testes instead of ovaries can't really be considered truly female.
Why not?
J.
I agree that it's sick making things like this public, but the fact remains that someone with testes instead of ovaries can't really be considered truly female.
Why not?
J.
Because he has testes.
It looks like the actual results still haven't been released, officially. The IAAF has indicated that, no matter the results of the test, they do not plan to strip her of her medal.
However, the results have yet to be released and the IAAF will not confirm or deny the original story, which has been reprinted all over the place.
This is might prove to be an almost impossible case to resolve to everyone's satisfaction, as s/he does not fall comfortably into either sex. Even if his/her chromosomes prove to be male, certain hormones might show him/her to be female on a hormonal level. What a headache. I wouldn't want to be one of the officials who has to make a decision like this.
I think they may in future have to resort to allowing inter-sexed individuals to choose which sex they want to compete with... it could be argued inter-sexed individuals are both sexes and also neither at the same time. What the hell do you do with that? It would be ridiculous to have inter-sexed athletics, as there wouldn't be enough athletes to make up a decent competition. Let them choose and be done with it. It's not like this would happen every year. As far as I can tell from the papers, this has never happened before, all other similar cases were planned deception, rather than instances of a genuine inter-sexed person.
Inter-sexed individuals have just as much right as anyone else to compete in the highest field of competition if they have the talent. This is something that happens in nature, and all sports in fact need to have clear guidelines for this. It's disgraceful these were not already in place. And now they're flaffing about while this poor girl/boy is gawked at by the world, waiting for a decision. Very sad.
Cakes488 said:Wait a minute...on GMA they said the offical results "were in"...??!! Is that not true? You mean to tell me a news outlet is wrong...I. just. can't. belive that!
I agree that it's sick making things like this public, but the fact remains that someone with testes instead of ovaries can't really be considered truly female.
Why not?
J.
Because he has testes.
She probably has to make a decision whether to have the unwanted organs removed in order to be able to compete in the future, although I suspect this cannot be enforced.
It looks like the actual results still haven't been released, officially. The IAAF has indicated that, no matter the results of the test, they do not plan to strip her of her medal.
However, the results have yet to be released and the IAAF will not confirm or deny the original story, which has been reprinted all over the place.
Wait a minute...on GMA they said the offical results "were in"...??!! Is that not true? You mean to tell me a news outlet is wrong...I. just. can't. belive that!
This whole situation is fucking hilarious, particularly as people attempt to define whether this individual is "male" or "female."She has a vagina.
Next?
J.
This whole situation is fucking hilarious, particularly as people attempt to define whether this individual is "male" or "female."She has a vagina.
Next?
J.
Gender and sex aren't something that is defined by any one given factor. There's simply too many exceptions to any one given rule. Is gender defined by genetics? There's enough screwed up chromosome combinations to make that sketchy, let alone various genes that influence physiology and hormone levels. Is it cultural? Well, cultures sometimes even define more than one gender. is it physiological? There's the intersex issue, but also the evidence that male to female transsexuality is something resembling brain intersex.
I love these discussions, I guess. It's amusing to watch people tryo to define biology and culture along lines in which neither fit.
This whole situation is fucking hilarious, particularly as people attempt to define whether this individual is "male" or "female."She has a vagina.
Next?
J.
Gender and sex aren't something that is defined by any one given factor. There's simply too many exceptions to any one given rule. Is gender defined by genetics? There's enough screwed up chromosome combinations to make that sketchy, let alone various genes that influence physiology and hormone levels. Is it cultural? Well, cultures sometimes even define more than one gender. is it physiological? There's the intersex issue, but also the evidence that male to female transsexuality is something resembling brain intersex.
I love these discussions, I guess. It's amusing to watch people tryo to define biology and culture along lines in which neither fit.
Why not?
J.
Because he has testes.
She has a vagina.
Next?
J.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.