• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Serenity vs. Star Trek

I just saw the thread title and had to pop in and give my regrets that I alas cannot participate; Conflicts of interests and all that. Anywho, peace out.
 
I love XI. (Flaws 'n all)

I liked BSG reboot a LOT.

I really liked Firefly, and I liked Serenity too.

I like Dr. Who

I hate Q.

I hate the Daleks.

That's about it.:vulcan:
 
I absolutely loved Star Trek 09.

I also really enjoyed Firefly and Serenity.

Bottom line: Serenity was a good movie that deserved better box office success. It lacked the pop cultural foundations that a franchise like Star Trek enjoys.

Star Trek was pretty moribund before Star Trek 09. The movie was successful, in large part, because it went back to the franchise's foundational characters, Kirk and Spock, and built success via pop cultural recognition of these characters and great word of mouth.
 
Serenity was a GREAT movie - it's plot was tighter and it resolved a number of character arcs from the series brilliantly. I think it beat the new Trek movie in the most recent top 100 too. The characters are more varied, more flawed, and more interesting than typical Trek. I was very disappointed that Cassiopeia didn't make it into Battlestar Galactica after enjoying Denara's turn as an ethical prostitute (although Number Six and Starbuck took on a number of aspects of her role). Compare Denara's role to the Orion cadet in Trek and you can see that Whedon has far more respect for his female characters. In fact, Trek's treatment of women generally looks neolithic compared to some of its rivals; it's the most irritating thing about the Trek reboot apart from that mess with the transporters...

Having said all that, Trek is still my favourite franchise, I loved the movie and I will probably forgive many of its shortcomings if Janice appears in the sequel!
 
Serenity was a GREAT movie - it's plot was tighter and it resolved a number of character arcs from the series brilliantly. I think it beat the new Trek movie in the most recent top 100 too.

Yep, Serenity clocks in at #88 and Star Trek is at #93.

I have to approve of a list that ranks Forbidden Planet at #12, ahead of any Star Trek movie, and that leaves the vast majority of Trek movies off altogether.
 
Last edited:
Serenity was a GREAT movie - it's plot was tighter and it resolved a number of character arcs from the series brilliantly. I think it beat the new Trek movie in the most recent top 100 too.

Yep, Serenity clocks in at #88 and http://staging.usphs.cit.nih.gov/upcoming_events.aspx is at #93.

I have to approve of a list that ranks Forbidden Planet at #12, ahead of any Star Trek movie, and that leaves the vast majority of Trek movies off altogether.

List schmist. The rankings are pretty meaningless in the overall scheme of things.

As I said in the thread on the thread about this particular list...I can't take seriously a list that leaves out films like Abre Los Ojos, Pi, The Iron Giant and City Of Lost Children (not to mention TMP) but includes Westworld and Terminator 2.

It was a good list in that it respected great SF classics like Forbidden Planet, Metropolis and The Day The Earth Stood Still. Great also to note the inclusion of more demanding and/or off beat films like Solaris, The Stalker, The Man Who Fell To Earth, The Quiet Earth, La Jetee, Altered States etc.

I was also happy to see Moon on there, and I suspect District 9 would have made the list had it been released earlier in the year. That's a pretty good showing for recent SF.

The ST movies are a mixed bag. I do think TWOK deserves a nice spot on the list, as does XI, and I'd actially have TMP on there too.
 
List schmist. The rankings are pretty meaningless in the overall scheme of things.

Everything is pretty meaningless in the overall scheme of things, as there is no overall scheme of things.

It was a good list in that it respected great SF classics like Forbidden Planet, Metropolis and The Day The Earth Stood Still. Great also to note the inclusion of more demanding and/or off beat films like Solaris...

Yep, and the Tartovsky version at that - not that Lem thought much of either.
 
List schmist. The rankings are pretty meaningless in the overall scheme of things.

Everything is pretty meaningless in the overall scheme of things, as there is no overall scheme of things.

Ahh..exactly.

But let me rephrase my comment for accuracy: I don't personally find individual rankings on lists like this very meaningful - commercial nonentities are placed above great films, with the merely well crafted and the the merely entertaining interspersed throughout. (I'm not damning with faint praise here, as I'm very fond of many of these kinds of films, including the unlisted Quatermass & The Pit and The Hidden).

But I set no store by the fact that Total Sci-Fi has Serenity higher that XI or TWOK, due to the fact it has some great SF totally missing and blatant medicorities above far worthier films.

These kinds of lists best serve as starting points for discussion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My favourite film of all time was Blade Runner, until 2005 when Serenity came out. The only Trek film that comes close to the greatness of Serenity is TMP (pretty gorram close, btw).:lol:
 
Serenity Budget: $40,000,000
Star Trek Budget: $150,000,000

Serenity has:
- A tough as nails but always morally in check Malcolm Reynolds as the main character. Even though he's going for the cash, he can still pull off being a character you can like and respect.
- Supporting characters actually have importance to the main character both in their abilities and in their companionship.
- Lots and lots of creative, non-practical sets, including Serenity's engineering area.
- A unique villain who is dedicated to not only his job, but also in what he believes in. He is a foe who understands that he himself is and will go to great lengths to achieve what he believe is true. He doesn't look at himself as a hero, but as a tool to make his dreams come true, which he even admits he wants nothing to do with due to his dark nature.
- An epic space battle involving hundreds of ships and great visual effects moments.
- Actual element of danger.
- No destiny, fate or foretold futures.
- Characters who respect those who they have lost.
- More than one important female character.
- The hero chooses to not kill the villain even without offering him a chance to surrender

Star Trek has:
- An arrogant, selfish James T. Kirk who just wants to be the best at everything even if it means cheating. He gives no respect towards others and has little to no redeeming qualities.
- Supporting characters' roles are limited to just ensuring that Kirk gets up in rank while they stay around just doing their usual thing.
- Sets are over lit, practical sets are used when they've never been used before, and engineering has concrete, steel beams and hanging light fixtures.
- A villain who is angry because he doesn't see situations from anyone else's point of view other than his own. His priorities are unrealistic, his backstory is heavily cliche and he never develops or goes through any change as a character.
- One space battle in the opening that involves only two ships.
- No element of danger since everyone who shoots at our characters can't aim, can't predict what they are about to do or guard anything important that is actually vital to their whole purpose.
- Destiny and fate have a major factor in that everyone comes together in the most unrealistically convenient manner, and the reasons these are great characters is not what they do, but because we are told they're great.
- Characters have next to no respect for one another. Kirk never apologizes for the rude, disloyal and incriminating actions throughout the story. McCoy makes racist remarks behind people's backs.
- Only one female character in the entire cast of characters and she doesn't do anything. Seriously. You can remove that klingon transmission element and nothing would be different.
- The hero decides to kill the villain after he refuses the surrender. The big point that goes against Kirk in this scene is that the villain was already doomed before being offered the chance to surrender.

What's the difference between Serenity and Star Trek? Serenity had talent behind the camera.

So...not a STXI Fan huh?

I loved both but thats a tough one.

Both had strengths and weaknesses... not a big fan of what happened to Wash and Book that killed a lot for me.

However unlike Serenity , Trek has a sequel.
 
I loved both but thats a tough one.
I loved both, however it's really no contest; however much fun it was to see Kirk, Spock & Bones get their Trek off, Serenity had a more organic & realistic feel to the characters & events. On the popcorn scale, Trek blows Serenity out of the water, but for meatyness, Joss just out-directs JJ I'm afraid.;)
 
I generally liked Firefly/Serenity. The folksy dialogue did get tiring at times though.
 
So...not a STXI Fan huh?

I loved both but thats a tough one.

Both had strengths and weaknesses... not a big fan of what happened to Wash and Book that killed a lot for me.

However unlike Serenity , Trek has a sequel.

Man those were tough, especially Wash.

XI and Serenity are very different flavors of SF to me. I'm happy to have them both...and soon...VII!! Yay!
 
My litmus test - I didn't go see Serenity five times at the movies. I did for Star Trek.

I do own the DVD box set for Firefly but I've not been compelled to watch Serenity again.
I saw Serenity one time in the theatre, and watched it 30+ times more once I got the DVD.
I saw JJ's Trek one time in the theatre, and look forward to wearing that disk out as well, once it's released.:drool:

[Mal]You sayin' that 'cause you think I don't know?[/Mal]

Serenity is about the underdogs who lost a war, and are now scraping by with the minimum success necessary to stay "in the black" (pun intentional).
Lindley, by my pretty floral bonnet, you are the genuine article!
Know what I found out? A Lego Serenity is so much gorram easier to build than a Lego Enterprise!;)

Really, Firefly is the anti-Trek. No aliens, no exploration (beyond what was necessary to leave Earth-that-was), no "Kirk-Fu", no love for government...
It's really more like Gene Roddenberry's "Planet Earth" if you think about it.
Pax...Serenity... :techman:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top