This clip makes it all seem like part of the same thing, like all violence is a ballet. Except for the crunching bit at the end, which is really weird.
The acting in front of the newstand is *terrible*. Fan film.
and this would give Hollis two scenes in the movie, instead of one...? why bother with the character at all?
Why have any minor character in the movie at all? Get rid of everyone except the main characters! But seriously Hollis Mason enhanced the film.
I don't agree. Hollis had a cameo at the beginning... and now he dies? It feels a little bit like having the Snow Monster from Empire Strikes Back come back at the end for a death scene. Why bring him back?
I don't object to having minor characters in the movie. But when the main characters lose a lot of their development (Dr. Manhattan, Ozymandias) and when some main plot threads are dropped (Laurie vs. Comedian), then why are we reprising a character who was virtually cut anyway?
Instead of having a cameo in the movie he gets an ending which I thought was really needed. The scene does a good job at showing how much chaos there is near the end.
I think, with Hollis's reduced role, people would have wondered either who this guy was, or why the guy from the opening was getting beat down by these people who weren't in the movie before. The connection's a little thin in the original, but nearly non-existent here.
I don't see how being beaten to death can be considered a good thing even with the music. It was pretty sad scene. The acting by the gang members isn't great. But it's only for a few seconds so it really doesn't bother me that much.
I thought the scene in the graphic novel was sadder. The clip I saw makes it feel like Mason is going down in a blaze of glory, like it's his final moment of superhero-ing, he dies on his feet, like a hero blah blah blah... in the graphic novel, he's just gutted, surprised with a handful of Halloween candy, beaten senseless for no reason... I'm just not sure what the point of the scene as filmed is.
I see a lot of support for it, so I guess it worked for someone. I tried very hard not to hold the movie responsible for being faithful to the graphic novel - I know it needs to be free to do its own thing. In fact, I thought it was most successful when it broke free - the opening montage, the Comedian killing, the revised plot and ending... all that, I thought worked.
When it started recreating frames from the original, though, it was just inviting a comparison, and rarely measuring up. If you're going to recreate the moment, then include the original reason for the moment. This, like Laurie's revelation on Mars, like the sex scene, like Dan and Laurie's fight in the alley, like most of the Antarctic stuff felt recreated for the sake of making it look like the original.