Sci, that IS the original design.
I never used the term "original design." I said that I prefer the
current design -- that is, I prefer the TARDIS prop they've been using since Christopher Eccleston's first episode. I never claimed that the Eccleston/Tennant TARDIS prop was the original design.
Moffat appears to be going back to the classic series, which you hate because you think it's all JNT.
I don't dislike the new TARDIS because it's more closely patterned on the DW TOS TARDIS, I dislike the new TARDIS because I don't think it looks as good as the current design. The current TARDIS -- by which I mean, the Eccleston/Tennant TARDIS -- actually looks like it's made of wood. It looks
old and rickety and magical, and I love the proportions of it.
With this design, it looks too new. It doesn't look old or rickety. It looks like it's either not made of wood or like it's made of wood that was just bought from a store two weeks ago. The windows look really fake. And I don't like the proportions -- I would tend to prefer a TARDIS that is less wide than that.
I know some people can't stand the thought that I'm not a DW TOS fan and therefore believe any and all criticisms I make are mere blasphemy uttered for the sake of uttering thoughtless invective, but believe it or not, I could actually give a shit one way or the other if the TARDIS design originated from DW TOS or not. I just don't happen to
like it, irrelevant of when it was first designed.
ETA: Now, do I consider this a huge deal? No, I do not. I have no doubt that Moffat and Company are going to deliver a wonderful, fun
Doctor Who in 2010. But this happens to simply be a creative choice I disagree with.