It was not about aerodynamics. If I had to guess it was because the original nacelles looked a lot like rockets.
I didn't like it then, and I don't like it now- Church's design corrects that, and for that, at the very least, I am grateful.
It was not about aerodynamics. If I had to guess it was because the original nacelles looked a lot like rockets.
I'd imagine so, yeah.
I didn't like it then, and I don't like it now- Church's design corrects that, and for that, at the very least, I am grateful.
Yeah, Church's nacelles are a big improvement on the Phase II/TMP things.
So are the nacelles and nacellecaps on Eaves' -E, but I don't see much love thrown in his direction.
So are the nacelles and nacellecaps on Eaves' -E, but I don't see much love thrown in his direction.
Because they're ugly compared to their immediate predecessor, the Probert design for the NCC-1701-D. Pretty simple to understand.
Everyone has a opinion and I think that is great! My opinion is that that Edselprise is just awful looking inside and out! It sucks!trevanian;3205836 Outside of Richard Taylor's notion for nacelle fronts (stuff I don't think anybody loves) [/QUOTE said:The move away from rounded nacelles was a big mistake, IMO. It was an era-related thing, the idea of 70's aerodynamics, which had no place on a ship in space. I didn't like it then, and I don't like it now- Church's design corrects that, and for that, at the very least, I am grateful.
NuE ROCKS!!!
(Thanks Church & JJ)![]()
My opinion is that that Edselprise is just awful looking...
I like the TMP nacelles except for the radiator grille fronts. From there back they're fine.
You know what I'd like to see? An Enterprise that looked like it was designed in the late 40s or the 50s--maybe even the 20s or 30s: an unvarnished saucer connected to an unvarnished cigar in turn connected to two blatant, Hugo Award-like rockets. In MJs exact configuration, of course.
Personally, I always assumed they tapered the tail ends of the nacelles like that precisely to eliminate any possibility that anyone could assume there was an exhaust of any sort there.I like the TMP nacelles except for the radiator grille fronts. From there back they're fine.
The very back end of the refit nacelles always seemed a little too plain to my eye, but I guess that might just my subconscious assuming there should be some suggestion of exhaust/emission back there, even if the actual warp propulsion effect is being generated between the two inboard sections (as proposed by Abel's people but not implemented by Trumbull's.)
Personally, I always assumed they tapered the tail ends of the nacelles like that precisely to eliminate any possibility that anyone could assume there was an exhaust of any sort there.I like the TMP nacelles except for the radiator grille fronts. From there back they're fine.
The very back end of the refit nacelles always seemed a little too plain to my eye, but I guess that might just my subconscious assuming there should be some suggestion of exhaust/emission back there, even if the actual warp propulsion effect is being generated between the two inboard sections (as proposed by Abel's people but not implemented by Trumbull's.)
You know what I'd like to see? An Enterprise that looked like it was designed in the late 40s or the 50s--maybe even the 20s or 30s: an unvarnished saucer connected to an unvarnished cigar in turn connected to two blatant, Hugo Award-like rockets. In MJs exact configuration, of course.
Pity I have no talent with drawing or computer imaging...
Define "exactly", please. Did it have the indention, or the scooped back? How close do you think it was? Just curious.I recall seeing a picture from a 40's or 50's sci fi movie that had a small craft with nacelles exactly like the tos enterprise and left no doubt where MJ got his inspiration from, but of course I don't remember where I saw it or what movie it was, maybe Flash Gordon or Buck Rogers???
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.