• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Saw it again. Some new thoughts.

I was thinking we don't get what SFA is. Pike talked about his dissertation. What if schooling has changed and the academy is a PhD level program for people coming in with a college level education. This would allow variable completion times to come into play.

Further, I offer that the displinary meeting and commissioning was only for graduating cadets, based on the amount of red squad... er cadets I saw on earth when the drill was lowered.

And lastly, Uhura is a Cadet and a Lt.... based on dialog when she relieves the Enterprise communications officer. Saavik is the same, in star trek 2 going from failing the no-win scenario to being a lt on the bridge... and weeks later, serving as a lead scientist on the grissom.

Kirk is never referred to by rank BECAUSE he was made first officer of the Enterprise before he ever served a shift.

Its possible you can enlist as a ensign (like a college graduate can now), you can take your education and go to an elite war college/science college/international relations college and come out at a higher rank and fast track career.

The key to this story is what was Captain Pike doing. When he made kirk an overnight cadet... that may have been an exceptional favor and not a regular recruitment tactic. You can't go from a bar fight to being a Naval Academy student overnight... it just cannot happen. When he made Kirk the 1st officer to Spock, he opened a door in his command hieracy where the 2000 odd people on the Enterprise now called an instanteously reassigned first officer sir. When he picked Kirk as his relief over every available captain and first officer in the fleet, he made an intergalactic statement of the type of fleet he plans to build.
 
The shuttle thing bothered me too. How many shuttles does this ship have ? It doesn't seem realistic to me to keep alot of them onboard when you have transporters. A few yes but enough to evacuate 800 people ?!

In this new timeline, lifepods dont seem to have been invented, or if they have they are exclusively used to maroon troublesome officers. So they probably would have a lot more shuttles aboard than we are used to, even if most of them are outfitted as lifeboats.

Seemed to be a cloud of small objects where the Kelvan had been-lifepods?

Just saw the movie-loved it. Too much fun. Piss on canon-this was a great romp!
 
31 or so per shuttle
it's a bunch of people per shuttle but if faced with certain death, you might have to make it work, if we could get data on the internal dimensions of the shuttles maybe we could do some calculating.
 
It stands to reason that any ship at all, whether it has civilians on it or not, would have enough shuttlecraft to evacuate plus 10%+ emergency buffer. Why the hell would Starfleet not equip a vessel with more than adequate means of escape? Is humanity going to forget the lesson of the Titanic any time soon? :rolleyes:
 
I doubt 23rd century life support systems rely on stored tanks of O2. That's not to say it wouldn't stretch the life support systems to their breaking point. But then again, if they are supposed to serve as lifeboats, we can give the engineers credit for not being idiots, and assume they thought of that.

Got to have it to start with. Furthermore, no recycling/reclamation system is 100% efficient, so you actually need a surplus to start out with. Plus a reserve on top of that for emergencies (like when the recycler breaks down, or a hull breach vents atmo). It's a closed loop system, so EVERYTHING must originate (and terminate) within the ship for long periods of time.
 
Militaries change.

Admiral Nelson received his first command at the ripe old age of 20.

Like Kirk, he was a Big Damn Hero.

Unlike Kirk, who is the Big Damn Hero of a fictional world, Nelson actually existed and won victories that saved Britain.

He also probably joined the service when he was 12-13 years old. The concept of people not being adults until they are 18 is a late 19th/20th century concept.
 
The blueprints of the E D, as well as the TNG tech manual indicate a shuttle compliment of over 50.

Well that solves that. Wow. Never got the impression they had so many.
They never really gave you a true sense of the size of the ship to begin with either. The Main Shuttlebay on the D is the better part of 2 stories tall. Go stand next to a 2 story building and look up.

Go into town (if you live in one that has one) and find a 10 story building and go stand next to it and look up. Now multiply that by 4 and you have the rough height of the E-D.
 
I was thinking we don't get what SFA is. Pike talked about his dissertation. What if schooling has changed and the academy is a PhD level program for people coming in with a college level education. This would allow variable completion times to come into play.

Further, I offer that the displinary meeting and commissioning was only for graduating cadets, based on the amount of red squad... er cadets I saw on earth when the drill was lowered.

And lastly, Uhura is a Cadet and a Lt.... based on dialog when she relieves the Enterprise communications officer. Saavik is the same, in star trek 2 going from failing the no-win scenario to being a lt on the bridge... and weeks later, serving as a lead scientist on the grissom.

Kirk is never referred to by rank BECAUSE he was made first officer of the Enterprise before he ever served a shift.

Its possible you can enlist as a ensign (like a college graduate can now), you can take your education and go to an elite war college/science college/international relations college and come out at a higher rank and fast track career.

The key to this story is what was Captain Pike doing. When he made kirk an overnight cadet... that may have been an exceptional favor and not a regular recruitment tactic. You can't go from a bar fight to being a Naval Academy student overnight... it just cannot happen. When he made Kirk the 1st officer to Spock, he opened a door in his command hieracy where the 2000 odd people on the Enterprise now called an instanteously reassigned first officer sir. When he picked Kirk as his relief over every available captain and first officer in the fleet, he made an intergalactic statement of the type of fleet he plans to build.
I am thinking along the same lines. After all McCoy went to the academy as a medical doctor. A 17 year old Ensign Checkov suggest that all officers don't go through the academy as years of TV series have suggested. SFA may serve the same function as the elite war colleges where potential senior leaders are sent. Kirk can be explained by an Officer and Gentleman type OCS program before entering the academy with Uhura.

We have all spent many years self describing how Sulu, Riker, Paris, Nog, Tucker.... were the elite of the elite. So we find it hard to believe that a single Captain, Pike in this case can just pull a Kirk aside and bestow super-elite status and immediate command upon him based on the potential he sees. But judging by how Nog reacted to the Red Squad cadat leadership that is how Starfleet operates.
 
On the question of military realism, the only thing that slightly—and I do mean slightly—bothered me was the apparent reversion to the "all officers, no crew" writing of the TNG era. DS9/VOY had sort of fixed that problem by acknowledging there were NCOs and crew on board.

Do agree with those upthread that in an ideal world, the writers would stick to the 18th/19th Century Royal Navy concept—something like the HMS Beagle being a lot more like Starfleet than the modern US Navy—but we're long past the point where we can have any real hopes for that.
 
Yes, Starfleet often talks like a military, but from the top to the bottom on all possible dimensions, it rarely walks like a military (even a notional 23rd century military). If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck. But if it's a college student walking around an amusement park in a duck suit earning money to pay down her college loans...
If a fleet of battleships, owned by the government, is engaged in a war with battleships owned by another government, firing torpedoes at each other, and whose officers can be subject to a court-martial if they disobey orders, what word other than "military" could you possibly apply to that?

Starfleet academy is training cadets to be officers in the fleet. The fleet that fights wars and transports soldiers to battles. It's like arguing that the U.S. Navy is not a military organization.

When the United Federation of Planets is at war, there is only one military organization that is depicted, and that is Starfleet. What possible evidence exists that Starfleet does not act as the ONLY military organization of the Federation?

Maybe some people view Starfleet as the modern-day NASA, which is mainly a scientific organization, but most NASA pilots are U.S. Air Force officers, and the minute you outfit the Space Shuttle with ray guns and torpedoes, it has become a military vessel.
 
On the question of military realism, the only thing that slightly—and I do mean slightly—bothered me was the apparent reversion to the "all officers, no crew" writing of the TNG era. DS9/VOY had sort of fixed that problem by acknowledging there were NCOs and crew on board.

Do agree with those upthread that in an ideal world, the writers would stick to the 18th/19th Century Royal Navy concept—something like the HMS Beagle being a lot more like Starfleet than the modern US Navy—but we're long past the point where we can have any real hopes for that.

o brien and others were crew but just dressed in similar uniforms unlike tos were the crew /techs wore distinctive uniforms for the most part.

as for kirk i wonder seriously if jim had thought about the academy taken the tests and for some reason decided not to go further with it.

remember that line about his aptitude tests being off the chart.

for all we know kirk might have attended college but not done anything with his life since leaving it.
 
The shuttle thing bothered me too. How many shuttles does this ship have ? It doesn't seem realistic to me to keep alot of them onboard when you have transporters. A few yes but enough to evacuate 800 people ?!

In this new timeline, lifepods dont seem to have been invented, or if they have they are exclusively used to maroon troublesome officers. So they probably would have a lot more shuttles aboard than we are used to, even if most of them are outfitted as lifeboats.

Seemed to be a cloud of small objects where the Kelvan had been-lifepods?

Just saw the movie-loved it. Too much fun. Piss on canon-this was a great romp!

Looked like debris from the Nerada to me. I could be wrong, but i really dont want to have to pay to see the film again to find out. :)
 
If a fleet of battleships, owned by the government, is engaged in a war with battleships owned by another government, firing torpedoes at each other, and whose officers can be subject to a court-martial if they disobey orders, what word other than "military" could you possibly apply to that?

Starfleet academy is training cadets to be officers in the fleet. The fleet that fights wars and transports soldiers to battles. It's like arguing that the U.S. Navy is not a military organization.

When the United Federation of Planets is at war, there is only one military organization that is depicted, and that is Starfleet. What possible evidence exists that Starfleet does not act as the ONLY military organization of the Federation?

Maybe some people view Starfleet as the modern-day NASA, which is mainly a scientific organization, but most NASA pilots are U.S. Air Force officers, and the minute you outfit the Space Shuttle with ray guns and torpedoes, it has become a military vessel.

Except they're not battleships, the wars and battles they get involved in are incidental to their primary purpose and they only fight them out of sheer necessity, and they spend the vast majority of their time conducting missions of exploration, diplomacy, and humanitarian purposes. Does the US Navy crew its aircraft carriers with marine biologists, geologists, and meteorologists and use the aircraft aboard to monitor hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico?

DS9 features the only genuine "war" in Trek continuity other than perhaps ENT which I stopped watching almost immediately and don't know what happened in. While I enjoy DS9 the most out of any Trek, it's not really relevant to the TOS/AU-TOS paradigm we're working with now. The Defiant was something novel and unusual to the Starfleet of its age: a ship of war. Until then, they armed their ships and personnel because of the hazards they foresaw in space. Gene Roddenberry said outright that one of the overarching themes of Trek is peace and not just through superior firepower.

I agree with whoever said above that Starfleet was an armada full of the space equivalent of the H.M.S. Beagle: armed, nominally Naval, but exclusively exploratory in nature.
 
as for kirk i wonder seriously if jim had thought about the academy taken the tests and for some reason decided not to go further with it.

remember that line about his aptitude tests being off the chart.

I agree. He could have taken the tests in order to get his mom off his back. That's why I took the ACT a second time. And Mom was right. Even though I took it with a blow-off attitude the second time, I scored two points higher and got all sorts of additional scholarship opportunities. I thought I'd never live it down, but she hasn't brought it up again.


for all we know kirk might have attended college but not done anything with his life since leaving it.

It's even possible he was doing a bang-up job with his life, other than the occasional bar-fight. He may have been a very successful business man, or motorcycle racer, or both. Prime Kirk had many interests. It's very possible that nuKirk was well on his way to developing one of them when the course of his life changed to Starfleet. After all, even competitive racing and successfully managing your own branding and team doesn't compare to commanding a starship.
 
Don't you people pay any attention at all? Kirk is 25 in that movie.

Yeah, actually, I know that. I should have more stressed the point that you don't typically enter an academy as a 22 year old (although at least in this case, Pike made a point of Kirk having been a ne'er-do-well for a few years).

The point I should have stressed is that he's only had three years of training to do this incredibly complex and dangerous job -- and he's also had no years of experience in observing how it's done and getting used to a command structure.

I can *accept* FTL drive, cause Trek's always had it. I can *accept* phasers, transporters, Vulcans, Klingons, etc., cause Trek's always had 'em.

I *cannot* accept this total lack of reality in the critical aspect of their origin story because it shows a typical Hollywood writer's lack of understanding of THIS kind of thing (in favor of, let's face it, something that looks VERY much like a Mary Sue story), because Trek has NOT as a rule had that kind of credulity-straining crapola.

He hadn't graduated. He was in his THIRD YEAR. And when you graduate, you are an ensign.

Well first, Pike says Kirk could be done with the Academy in 4 years and he says "I'll do it in 3". Then it says "3 years later". So the implication was that he graduated early.

No, the implication was that he INTENDED to graduate early.

Academies have standard curricula and specific things you have to do (including things like the senior cruise, where you actually serve time on a ship learning the REAL ropes).

They are not like a regular college where you can overload a core curriculum and take "18 hours" instead of "12."

He went from a third-year cadet (a junior, for god's sake) to CAPTAIN -- from O-zero to O6 in five minutes.

Again, he was a graduate not a cadet.

Ummmm... no.

He was still a cadet. He was still in a cadet's uniform, he was still taking cadet tests, and was called up on charges for CHEATING. If he was a graduate, none of this would be true.


Yeah, I recognize that. But a *singular* achievement does not negate the need for training and experience.

Clearly, he didn't NEED any more training or experience. He took command of a ship that was set to not aid Earth *at all*, turned the situation around, and literally saved the planet.

He was lucky. Once.

For that, you get a medal. Or a promotion. You don't get a free year-early graduation, a medal, a jump of six rank steps and your own ship.

That kind of shit is "Mary Sue" storytelling. It's not professional, it's rank amateur hour.

And again, Horation Nelson was a Captain at 20 and Stephen Decatur was commanding the Enterprise at 19 and was a full Captain by 25.

Your definition of "strains credulity" flies right in the face of naval military history.

The military structure of the 20th century, where promotion is based on tenure as much as anything, is certainly not the only way competent fleets have ever been organized.

In fact, history has frequently been written by extremely young, "inexperienced " men taking command of troops.

Alexander the Great had conquered the known world by the time he was 30. Talk about straining credulity! Except, you know, it actually happened.

You realize that these "young men" had already spent half or more of their lives DOING what they were doing, right? They *got* the experience, they moved up through the ranks. (Alexander doesn't count: It's good to be born a prince, you get your general's stars with your baby rattle, but you still have to be taught tactics by your father's generals, and learn how to fight and start of leading small groups and wings.)

I was thinking we don't get what SFA is. Pike talked about his dissertation. What if schooling has changed and the academy is a PhD level program for people coming in with a college level education. This would allow variable completion times to come into play.

I took this to be another case of a writer not knowing what really goes on. I took it to be a reference to a senior thesis, which some schools require; or, perhaps, like other officers, Pike attended an advanced graduate school *after* graduating from the academy (as many academy graduates today still do) to learn more intensive material useful for his command (I know academy grads with advanced degrees in international relations, history, languages, area studies, etc.).
 
I took this to be another case of a writer not knowing what really goes on. I took it to be a reference to a senior thesis, which some schools require; or, perhaps, like other officers, Pike attended an advanced graduate school *after* graduating from the academy (as many academy graduates today still do) to learn more intensive material useful for his command (I know academy grads with advanced degrees in international relations, history, languages, area studies, etc.).

Orrrrr, it could be a case where Starfleet Academy is not what you think it is, nor is it what it was in the Prime 'verse.

I interpreted "dissertation" to mean that Starfleet expects its people to continue putting out research in much the same way academia expects its professors to publish or perish. After all, pretty much everyone on board a Starfleet vessel is a scientist in some capacity or another. So some of them happen to be badasses on the side -- well fan-fucking-tastic, this is a space opera story! Epic characters and improbable heroism are the meat and potatoes of space opera.

Instead of accusing the writers of ignorance and stupidity because you think it ought to work differently, why not accept what happens on screen and work backwards from there?
 
And again, Horation Nelson was a Captain at 20 and Stephen Decatur was commanding the Enterprise at 19 and was a full Captain by 25.

Your definition of "strains credulity" flies right in the face of naval military history.

The military structure of the 20th century, where promotion is based on tenure as much as anything, is certainly not the only way competent fleets have ever been organized.

In fact, history has frequently been written by extremely young, "inexperienced " men taking command of troops.

Alexander the Great had conquered the known world by the time he was 30. Talk about straining credulity! Except, you know, it actually happened.

You realize that these "young men" had already spent half or more of their lives DOING what they were doing, right? They *got* the experience, they moved up through the ranks. (Alexander doesn't count: It's good to be born a prince, you get your general's stars with your baby rattle, but you still have to be taught tactics by your father's generals, and learn how to fight and start of leading small groups and wings.)

And Kirk had been trained to do the job of commanding a starship, and then proved he could DO IT by actually, you know, doing it.

I really don't get the distinction you're trying to draw.

Horation Nelson spent 7 years in the Navy and was a Captain by 20, for distinguishing himself through actual service.

Kirk spent 3 years in a military academy and then was promoted to 1st Officer in a crisis, then promoted to Captain in a crisis, and then had that rank confirmed because he provided EXCELLENT service in the field in his capacity as Brevet Captain of the Enterprise.

In each case, except for the length of service, you have very young men being given jobs they've PROVEN (by action in the field during live combat situations) they can do.

It just rubbed YOU the wrong way, because it was less time than YOU felt was required.

But it's really not patently absurd on its face.

Edited to add one final addendum:

You talk about how Nelson "moved up through the ranks". Yes he did. But he had the help of a very influential navy relative with contacts in the fleet, who made sure Nelson, at the age of 13 was admitted as an officer, and who actively sped up his rise through the ranks.

So Nelson being a Captain at 20 was not somehow normal, nor was it something everyone was ok with. There were many, many people hoping the young upstart would fall on his face.

That seems rather similar to how Pike was actively doing everything in his not inconsiderable power to speed Kirk's rise through the ranks, thinking he was something Star Fleet needed.
 
And there is plenty of scope (most likely in books rather than onscreen, but still) to explore "many, many people hoping the young upstart would fall on his face". I expect the novelists to get a lot of mileage out of that.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top