I (foolishly) posted a new thread after seeing the movie which was just closed b/c it was clutter.
Sorry again to the mods, I don't post here much but I am a bbs vet and should've known better.
I'll repost what I said here:
I stand by that.
I know some of you think I'm just being negative or a closet SW fan or something.
But JJ Abrams has sucked everything unique and special about Gene Roddenberry's vision out of this new Star Trek movie. All that we're left with is Die Hard in space. If that's what you want to see, you'll love this movie.
Sorry again to the mods, I don't post here much but I am a bbs vet and should've known better.
I'll repost what I said here:
"Star Trek Died Today
It was beaten to a bloody pulp, rendered senseless and unimportant, reformed and shaped into a more pleasing shape, and fed to the horde of groundlings who'll gladly eat it up.
I just got back from seeing it.
It was bloody awful. Technically proficient, but conceptually something more like an abortion. A half idea. A "what if?" gone way too far. And a perversion of the brand's original intent. JJ Abrams would've been better off giving the finger to the creative talent, writers/producers, and fans of the series. That would've been much quicker and would've saved a lot of money which was instead invested in a pile of garbage.
Don't let me stop you, I know you have to see it. I know you think I'm crazy, or a geek gone wild, or something like that. Even after seeing it most of you will still hold that opinion of my perspective.
But IMO Star Trek, as we knew it, is dead."
I stand by that.
I know some of you think I'm just being negative or a closet SW fan or something.
But JJ Abrams has sucked everything unique and special about Gene Roddenberry's vision out of this new Star Trek movie. All that we're left with is Die Hard in space. If that's what you want to see, you'll love this movie.