Question on this: has anyone actually watched a feature film in IMAX? The only IMAX movies I've seen have been the documentary ones, and I found them a bit motion-sickness-inducing and too big to see details. How does that compare to the feature film experience? Thanks. {ProfJonathan}
i saw superman returns at the imax and was really disappointed to say the least. the image was really grainy. it looked much better on the normal movie screen.but then ive heard that it wasnt really shot for imax , so that could be the reason for the poor image.
Superman Returns was shot on HD cameras, not film stock--35mm film has twice the resolution of HD cameras--the "blow up" for SR was starting at a lower resolution than Trek would.
i saw superman returns at the imax and was really disappointed to say the least. the image was really grainy. it looked much better on the normal movie screen.but then ive heard that it wasnt really shot for imax , so that could be the reason for the poor image.
i dont know why but i have seen films not shot for imax look both bad and good after being transfered to imax.
maybe it was in the quality of the original print or in the quality of the care taking with transfering up to imax size but a movie not shot originally all for imax can still look not as great as one shot in format but still really good.
In recent years (last three or so) IMAX has developed some processing tools that make non-IMAX footage look a lot better (provided it was on film stock--HD camera footage also benefit, but not as much). It's why the Dark Knight non-IMAX footage looked better than Spider-Man 2. The same processing should be in play for the Trek film.