It's been posted regarding some other things in Countdown that 1) it's too far off to say for sure (20 years post-Nemesis, yes?), but 2) no, they don't necessarily consider themselves bound by it.
Have the latest issues reconciled the inner chronological discrepancies, then?
Have the latest issues reconciled the inner chronological discrepancies, then?
Not as such, but the authors have stated in an interview that the comic takes place in 2387.
The trade paperback alters Spock's line in the first issue to having been 20 years on Romulus
The trade paperback alters Spock's line in the first issue to having been 20 years on Romulus
So you never heard of spoiler tags?![]()
Have the latest issues reconciled the inner chronological discrepancies, then?
Not as such, but the authors have stated in an interview that the comic takes place in 2387.
The trade paperback alters Spock's line in the first issue to having been 20 years on Romulus
So you never heard of spoiler tags?![]()
Yes - but since it's an error correction on something that's been debated to death....
Well, the elements specific to Countdown aren't binding on the novels, but those elements of Countdown which are based on Spock and Nero's 24th-century backstory from the movie would probably be a different matter, since of course they'd be mentioned in the actual film itself.
So you never heard of spoiler tags?![]()
Would the editors really want to fit Countdown into the main continuity since B-4 becomes Data in the Countdown-verse? I thought they all decided this was a stupid way to go.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.