As well as Inspector Lionheart and Professor Dunning...
In "The Battle", Picard called Vigo his Weapons Officer instead of his Tactical Officer.I guess they just wanted to add in a new character but I'm so confused i mean if invaders board the ship, who leads the security teams? Tuvok or the other guy? so stupid, and like I said no other ships have this which makes it even worse.
In addition to the aformentioned example of DaVinci, the Stargazer has had seperate tactical and security officers since Reunion. That said, I don't know if that was an invention of MJF or if he was basing it on a bit of broadcast.
Missed Pete Wisdom's bunch...
Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
On a space station/ship I always thought there should be two people. Someone who is good at shooting the ships phasers isn't necessarily who is going to be the best and deploying security when the ship is boarded, handling brawls or in hand-to-hand combat.
Missed Pete Wisdom's bunch...
Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
MI-13 is listed (not used except in fiction)
I always thought of MI6 (SIS) as being equivalent to CIA, and MI5 (SS) being more similar to the roles of the FBI and NSA, but then the FBI also encompassed things like SOCA do in the UK...
If you want to get really literal, I would tend to presume that Starfleet Intelligence is the Federation's equivalent of MI6 (external intelligence-gathering) and that Federation Security (established in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock) is the equivalent of MI5 or the US FBI (internal Federation police).
If you want to get really literal, I would tend to presume that Starfleet Intelligence is the Federation's equivalent of MI6 (external intelligence-gathering) and that Federation Security (established in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock) is the equivalent of MI5 or the US FBI (internal Federation police).
I don't know about that. Starfleet Intelligence is the intelligence division of the Federation's military. It's the equivalent of the Army's or Navy's intelligence division, not the equivalent of the CIA, which is civilian. There's far too great a tendency among fans to assume that Starfleet and the Federation are interchangeable, to forget that there's a difference between the military and the civilian government that it works for.
Federation Security would be a civilian security organization working for the government. They would be the equivalent of the FBI and perhaps the Secret Service (at least, I used them as a Secret Service type of organization in Ex Machina, civilian security charged with protecting UFP government officials and diplomats).
Fair enough, but we've never actually seen any other intelligence organization within the UFP other than SI that I'm aware of. Doesn't mean it doesn't exist -- but so far as I know, there IS no civilian intelligence agency. (Unless you count Section 31, which I do not.)
Interesting. That would imply that Federation Security might be the organization that Agents Wexler and Kistler from Destiny are part of.
So there's actually a justification for renaming the program(me) MI-5 for its American release, other than "those dumb Yanks might mistake it for a supernatural series"? Huh....and Spooks is named wrong. 5 aren't spooks, 6 are.
Veering OT: I heard two different reasons why the show was renamed for the US market - one was because there had been a show on US TV called Spooks already, and it had bombed, so they didn't want people confusing the two. The other was that the word had racist connotations.
But even the MACOs were, bizarrely, capable of both. Most of the time they provided muscle, of course, but in "Harbinger", we see Hayes running tactical simulations of space battles with the Xindi.Technically, Malcolm Reed was fulfilling both roles, at least until the MACOs became involved in security, although we may not wish to create strict equivalency between Earth Starfleet and Federation Starfleet.
Why Titan has a Chief Tactical Officer and a Chief of Security. As far as I can tell no other ship has this. I wouldn't mind If Titan was a front line combat ship, but it's an explorer, to me this makes no sense.
Technically, Malcolm Reed was fulfilling both roles, at least until the MACOs became involved in security, although we may not wish to create strict equivalency between Earth Starfleet and Federation Starfleet.
I just let it go as "Night Shift" & "Day Shift".
So we could always say that either the Chief of Tactical or the Chief of Security was offscreen at a particular time. That way, Worf could have been a Tactical Officer for Picard originally, although not the Chief Tactical Officer, while Yar would have been the Chief Security Officer, and so forth.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.