If you mean that too much tax money is spent on support for women who are raped, you're going on the 'pied in the face' list.
No. Really, really not say that.
Having read your posts before I was 99.9999999% sure that wasn't what you were saying, but this being the Internet and all, it sometimes does to check.
Unfortunately, here in the UK, victim support is often specifically denied to men, especially that for victims of domestic violence.
Unfortunately, I think it's the same here. Not so much that they're officially barred access to support, but that social stigma combined with lower numbers of men leads to a damning silence which must be a nightmare for victims. The one minisculely thin silver-lining for women nowadays is that there's a greater grassroots support network than in previous generations for those in need of help. (Though there's still the fact that
people spend more on protecting donkeys than on victim support.)
It's assbackwards when victim support is tagged and bagged as a "women's issue", because it simultaneously gives those in authority permission to dismiss it as some kind of niche problem, and also places painful extra barriers in front of survivors who don't meet the gender criteria of what a "victim" is supposed to look like.
If we could just recognise and support all victims, and not focus on truisms about gender we might get much further along the path to ending domestic violence.
I hope we can get better at this. There's a new ad campaign on telly over here trying to raise awareness of the problem of Bystander Syndrome with domestic abuse. I notice the one of the ads running on prime time is about a male victim of spousal violence. It caught my attention the first time I saw it to hear the unexpected pronouns.
Have I dragged the thread completely off topic yet, do you think, or do we still have a couple of inches to go?