It's the historical significance of the comparison.
It's very simple actually: There's a long history of racist depictions of African people as, and even equation with, apes - chimps, gorillas, orang-utans, whatever. That makes any such comparison of a man with African heritage incurably racist, regardless of how cute Curious George is. There's no such connotation with white men.
Comparing pictures of Bush with a chimp can be funny (or not, humour isn't always objective), it's certainly insulting, but it isn't racist. Comparing Obama to a monkey is.
These are the correct answers.Well into the 50's and 60's, black people were referred to as monkeys. "Porch monkey" and "jungle monkey", and they were used casually in many social circles. So the stigma is still there. To use such a phrase is to validate the hundreds of years that black people were oppressed in this country, and it's something that will not heal for a long time. To use it now is foolish, and I believe the creators of the Curious George/Obama dolls are absolutely bigots, no doubt in my mind.
The fact that race is a social concept is irrelevant. Social concepts have a big effect on people; that's why they call them social concepts.So what about the whole "race is a social concept" argument? Apparently that holds no water.
Last edited: