...your best bet is to write a polite letter to S&S expressing your admiration for Marco's work...
Ok, so, the boycott threat is out as an option.
What about the rest, though?
What about letters? Phone calls? Maybe the palm frond idea?
None of them would hurt S&S or anyone else who works for them. But it might make them re-think things. If not now, than certainly down the line when times are better.
This seems like a good question. Anybody got an answer?...your best bet is to write a polite letter to S&S expressing your admiration for Marco's work...
Who exactly would one address such a letter to? Is anyone familar with the hierarchy at S&S/Pocketbooks?
I keep harboring absurd hopes that in 6 months they'll see the error of their ways and hire him back, but Margaret runs the show now, so that'd be a demotion for her (right?) and I don't see that happening.
Both of the quoted statements aren't quite right. Margaret was senior to Marco, yes, but Margaret wasn't Marco's boss -- in fact, they both report(ed) to the same boss -- and when Marco was there, they both dealt with the higher-ups at S&S and the folks at CBS/Paramount (and authors, for that matter) equally, Marco for his projects, Margaret for hers. And if Marco did return for whatever reason, of course it wouldn't mean a demotion for Margaret. (Hell, Marco's firing wasn't a promotion for Margaret, it was just giving her more, and Ed, Jen, and Jaime, more work....)I was under the impression that Margaret Clark was above him in the chain of command, similar to "editor-in-chief" to Marco's "editor", and ran interference for him on the higher-ups and Paramount, while Marco largely just dealt with the authors. Is that impression correct?
No one. Like most of my jokes, it was poorly thought out, inexplicable, and unfunny.Mollmann, what former co-worker had issues with Marco? Every recent Trek book I've read has many kudos to him for giving them an opportunity to present their works, so I had the impression that he was universally beloved.
Mollmann, what former co-worker had issues with Marco? Every recent Trek book I've read has many kudos to him for giving them an opportunity to present their works, so I had the impression that he was universally beloved.
Like most of my jokes, it was poorly thought out, inexplicable, and unfunny.
Like most of my jokes, it was poorly thought out, inexplicable, and unfunny.
There just may be an epitaph in there!![]()
Thanks for clearing that up; I appreciate it.I keep harboring absurd hopes that in 6 months they'll see the error of their ways and hire him back, but Margaret runs the show now, so that'd be a demotion for her (right?) and I don't see that happening.
Both of the quoted statements aren't quite right. Margaret was senior to Marco, yes, but Margaret wasn't Marco's boss -- in fact, they both report(ed) to the same boss -- and when Marco was there, they both dealt with the higher-ups at S&S and the folks at CBS/Paramount (and authors, for that matter) equally, Marco for his projects, Margaret for hers. And if Marco did return for whatever reason, of course it wouldn't mean a demotion for Margaret. (Hell, Marco's firing wasn't a promotion for Margaret, it was just giving her more, and Ed, Jen, and Jaime, more work....)I was under the impression that Margaret Clark was above him in the chain of command, similar to "editor-in-chief" to Marco's "editor", and ran interference for him on the higher-ups and Paramount, while Marco largely just dealt with the authors. Is that impression correct?
Probably wouldn't be writing my first tie-in novel right now if it weren't for that.
Probably wouldn't be writing my first tie-in novel right now if it weren't for that.
I guess thanks to you now I actually have to give SG:A another chance, huh?![]()
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.