Even with all the sometimes contradictory tech references throughout the run of the show, I don't recall any references saying that the dilithium crystals were in the nacelles.
That's correct. Every crystal we ever saw was in an Engineering space.Even with all the sometimes contradictory tech references throughout the run of the show, I don't recall any references saying that the dilithium crystals were in the nacelles.
Could the amount of power output described in the cage be transmitted remotely without superheating the air into high energy plasma?
I mean in real life physics we're talking about here.
CuttingEdge100
They wanted to avoid cooking Pike and the Talosians. From orbit they would have been firing nearly straight down the elevator shaft.BTW: Why didn't they just use the ships lasers and shoot at the rock surface -- the surface the hand-weapons they were using couldn't get through --from orbit?
Absolutely not... that is why the show is set several hundred years in the future.Could the amount of power output described in the cage be transmitted remotely without superheating the air into high energy plasma?
I mean in real life physics we're talking about here.
I assume you'll be dismissing warp speeds also as those are more outside the realm of possibility than the transmission of energy from one point to another. And considering that the transporter is a derivative technology to the transmission of energy, you'll most likely be dismissing it too.Well, considering that The Cage was the first Star Trek episode and technology hadn't been well established and such, and that real physics can't transmit that power through atmosphere safely, I assume dismissing this particular part.
In either case, transmitting ships power through vacuum-ducts as pure energy isn't a bad idea...
CuttingEdge100
That was the biggest mistake made in Star Trek... and it was the type of mistake that might not hurt the show that much at the time, but does damage to it in the long run.Both these interpretations currently remain possible, and further ones can be devised. It's up to us or to future writers to lock on to a specific theory and make it the primary, perhaps explicit one.
It's a TERRIBLE idea, from a safety AND reliability standpoint. Break the vaccum seal, and then where are you?
For that matter, the whole "touch screen" console idea is a case of "kewl over function".
The more complex the tech, the easier it is for something to go wrong.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.