So, we're getting married this August and due to my family being religious Muslims, who do not drink (nor do I) we've chosen not to serve alcohol at our wedding. HOWEVER, my fiance's family does drink and so do my friends.
We're going to have about 100-120 people but it's just going to be family and close friends... no incidentals/acquaintances/work people.
I know that if we had zero alcohol that my friends (all non-muslim white folk) would still come and have a good time. Now keep in mind that my buddies are by and large heavy drinkers, but have known me since we were wee lads. But my fiance's friends are not able to have fun without alcohol; almost every single one acts like a wet rag if a social situation (i.e. birthday, beach volleyball, watching tv, etc...) does not have readily available booze.
As a way to ensure that the a-s-sholes wouldn't leave at 8pm, we booked a venue where there's a bar upstairs right above our banquet hall. My question is, this enough to keep people there? My friend had a wedding last year at the same venue and everyone had a great time, but none of the guests there struck me as those who "NEED" alcohol to "loosen up."
Personally, I don't get it. I can get down on the dancefloor and get crazy without any booze... never felt I needed it.
I'd like to get peoples' opinions on this. Personally, I feel that my fiance and I are going to considerable expense to offer our hospitality and ensure those closest to us can share in our special day. We are paying for food, a nice venue and entertainment. Why is it "expected" that alcohol be paid for? And even if not, your close friends are being married, what kind of person can't let it slide for a few hours and just have fun to honour their friends?
One wouldn't go to stay at someone's home and "expect" a level of hospitality i.e. booze/nintendo/whatever be made available would they? You take what you're offered and are grateful for it. It seems to me that its a disrespectful and ungrateful to leave a wedding of one of your good friends just because there's no booze.
We're going to have about 100-120 people but it's just going to be family and close friends... no incidentals/acquaintances/work people.
I know that if we had zero alcohol that my friends (all non-muslim white folk) would still come and have a good time. Now keep in mind that my buddies are by and large heavy drinkers, but have known me since we were wee lads. But my fiance's friends are not able to have fun without alcohol; almost every single one acts like a wet rag if a social situation (i.e. birthday, beach volleyball, watching tv, etc...) does not have readily available booze.
As a way to ensure that the a-s-sholes wouldn't leave at 8pm, we booked a venue where there's a bar upstairs right above our banquet hall. My question is, this enough to keep people there? My friend had a wedding last year at the same venue and everyone had a great time, but none of the guests there struck me as those who "NEED" alcohol to "loosen up."
Personally, I don't get it. I can get down on the dancefloor and get crazy without any booze... never felt I needed it.
I'd like to get peoples' opinions on this. Personally, I feel that my fiance and I are going to considerable expense to offer our hospitality and ensure those closest to us can share in our special day. We are paying for food, a nice venue and entertainment. Why is it "expected" that alcohol be paid for? And even if not, your close friends are being married, what kind of person can't let it slide for a few hours and just have fun to honour their friends?
One wouldn't go to stay at someone's home and "expect" a level of hospitality i.e. booze/nintendo/whatever be made available would they? You take what you're offered and are grateful for it. It seems to me that its a disrespectful and ungrateful to leave a wedding of one of your good friends just because there's no booze.