A
Amaris
Guest
Re: The bridge shots
Sorry, man, it was a difficult sentence to parse.
J.
Sorry, man, it was a difficult sentence to parse.
J.
The bridge shots (large images)
- Thread starter Ethan_Hunt_IMF
- Start date
Re: The bridge shots
Pwned.
...and any other person who knows how to write a coherent sentence and paragraph.
Pwned.
Re: The bridge shots
Honestly captain mike it would help if you would clarify what you were trying to say.
Is the complaint about fans not accepting there could be a reason why khan would recognize chekov even though he wasnt officially a character on the show until later.???
really i am puzzled about just what you ment.
as for iron man i think it was the character tony stark and the journey he went through that appealed more then just a lot of explosions.
looking at the bridge photo again while i still hate the hostess station there is a lot i am ok with including the display screens.
especially like the captains chair.
but what to me they got right was the body langauge of the characters.
especially pike as kirk and urban as mccoy.
I can't make an English sentence out of this no matter how I try. Help?
In any event, the Photoshop of Pine in the uniform looks very good. Nicely done.
Honestly captain mike it would help if you would clarify what you were trying to say.
Is the complaint about fans not accepting there could be a reason why khan would recognize chekov even though he wasnt officially a character on the show until later.???
really i am puzzled about just what you ment.
as for iron man i think it was the character tony stark and the journey he went through that appealed more then just a lot of explosions.
looking at the bridge photo again while i still hate the hostess station there is a lot i am ok with including the display screens.
especially like the captains chair.
but what to me they got right was the body langauge of the characters.
especially pike as kirk and urban as mccoy.
Re: The bridge shots
And that is basically what it comes down to on this board. Some don't agree with their opinion and decide to bash the other on their verbal and grammatical errors rather than the main topic(s) the poster has in discussion.
...and any other person who knows how to write a coherent sentence and paragraph.SO SAYETH THE ALMIGHTY POLARIS.....
Pwned.
And that is basically what it comes down to on this board. Some don't agree with their opinion and decide to bash the other on their verbal and grammatical errors rather than the main topic(s) the poster has in discussion.
A
Amaris
Guest
Re: The bridge shots
You kept it alive by directly responding to the comment.
If you would have let it drop, it wouldn't have been enough to justify responses. I usually don't call people out on grammar, and in this case did it only to let you know that I also found it difficult to parse correctly. That wasn't a slight against you. I'm not the type to hate someone or constantly poke fun and point out flaws because of disagreement. My answer was legitimate, and whether Dennis was irritated with you or not, if he can't understand something you've said, he'll say so.
J.
...and any other person who knows how to write a coherent sentence and paragraph.
Pwned.
And that is basically what it comes down to on this board. Some don't agree with their opinion and decide to bash the other on their verbal and grammatical errors rather than the main topic(s) the poster has discussion.
You kept it alive by directly responding to the comment.
If you would have let it drop, it wouldn't have been enough to justify responses. I usually don't call people out on grammar, and in this case did it only to let you know that I also found it difficult to parse correctly. That wasn't a slight against you. I'm not the type to hate someone or constantly poke fun and point out flaws because of disagreement. My answer was legitimate, and whether Dennis was irritated with you or not, if he can't understand something you've said, he'll say so.
J.
Re: The bridge shots
.
In your defense, Captain Mike, I didn't have too much trouble parsing this sentence. I just can't figure out what relevance it has to the discussion, nor even to the rest of your post. You've raised the non sequitur to an entirely new level, sir
.
Re: The bridge shots
Thanks for the assist. I simply meant there was so much confusion and plotholes of how Khan couldn't remember Chekov in TWOK. But yet he is a crew member in the new flick? And he doesn't seem as young as he should be.
In your defense, Captain Mike, I didn't have too much trouble parsing this sentence. I just can't figure out what relevance it has to the discussion, nor even to the rest of your post. You've raised the non sequitur to an entirely new level, sir
Thanks for the assist. I simply meant there was so much confusion and plotholes of how Khan couldn't remember Chekov in TWOK. But yet he is a crew member in the new flick? And he doesn't seem as young as he should be.
A
Amaris
Guest
Re: The bridge shots
I don't know, he looks pretty young there. McCoy is definitely a bit older, Scotty older, etc.
It does look like some creative license has been taken, but things look fairly consistent.
J.
In your defense, Captain Mike, I didn't have too much trouble parsing this sentence. I just can't figure out what relevance it has to the discussion, nor even to the rest of your post. You've raised the non sequitur to an entirely new level, sir
Thanks for the assist. I simply meant there was so much confusion and plotholes of how Khan couldn't remember Chekov in TWOK. But yet he is a crew member in the new flick? And he doesn't seem as young as he should be.
I don't know, he looks pretty young there. McCoy is definitely a bit older, Scotty older, etc.
It does look like some creative license has been taken, but things look fairly consistent.
J.
Re: The bridge shots
ahh i dont see that as an issue at all.
we already know khan was reading all he could about the ship.
he was also becoming familar with the crew.
all it took was for chekov to be serving else where on the ship beside the bridge when khan was on board.
really tos itself established this possibility with kevin riley who had been serving down below we learn before he became a bridge officer.
so i never saw the chekov thing as that big of an issue.
i just thought of this in another thread.
some of the differences in the bridge could be attributed that we may be seeing it in a slightly different period then we have before.
i wonder if the bridge scene is from the period in between the cage and where no man has gone before.
of course a lot can be attributed to a modern updating but some may be done to reflect that this wont be the final way the bridge will look later on.
cage bridge
pike thinks a little desk might be a cool idea
where no man has gone bridge
where no man has gone before bridge 2
ahh i dont see that as an issue at all.
we already know khan was reading all he could about the ship.
he was also becoming familar with the crew.
all it took was for chekov to be serving else where on the ship beside the bridge when khan was on board.
really tos itself established this possibility with kevin riley who had been serving down below we learn before he became a bridge officer.
so i never saw the chekov thing as that big of an issue.
i just thought of this in another thread.
some of the differences in the bridge could be attributed that we may be seeing it in a slightly different period then we have before.
i wonder if the bridge scene is from the period in between the cage and where no man has gone before.
of course a lot can be attributed to a modern updating but some may be done to reflect that this wont be the final way the bridge will look later on.
cage bridge
pike thinks a little desk might be a cool idea
where no man has gone bridge
where no man has gone before bridge 2
I have no problem with the bridge being different.
This is a different and new interpretation of Star Trek.
That's fine.
I DO think it's a little too bright for me, and all the little mini-spot lights make it look very busy. And I would have liked more of a symetrical layout.
I do like the chair and the handrail details - and what they've done with the surrounding screens.
This is a different and new interpretation of Star Trek.
That's fine.
I DO think it's a little too bright for me, and all the little mini-spot lights make it look very busy. And I would have liked more of a symetrical layout.
I do like the chair and the handrail details - and what they've done with the surrounding screens.
We're looking at it from an angle...
A
Amaris
Guest
That's the key. We have a snippet of the bridge at an angle, unfiltered and without motion. Even constructing it in my head I'm not sure how the layout will work.
J.
Re: The bridge shots
Then how about explaining what Captain Mike is waiting on the JJ fans for, because it sure as heck ain't clear in what he wrote. Is he waiting for them to complain?In your defense, Captain Mike, I didn't have too much trouble parsing this sentence. I just can't figure out what relevance it has to the discussion, nor even to the rest of your post. You've raised the non sequitur to an entirely new level, sir
Re: The bridge shots
Then face what is ultimately negative in your life (ST XI?) and overcome it.
Then face what is ultimately negative in your life (ST XI?) and overcome it.
A
Amaris
Guest
That's because, like J.J., I am a tease.
J.
Re: The bridge shots
You know, this simply clears up a plot hole from 26 years ago.
See, Chekov was on the ship all along!
In your defense, Captain Mike, I didn't have too much trouble parsing this sentence. I just can't figure out what relevance it has to the discussion, nor even to the rest of your post. You've raised the non sequitur to an entirely new level, sir
Thanks for the assist. I simply meant there was so much confusion and plotholes of how Khan couldn't remember Chekov in TWOK. But yet he is a crew member in the new flick? And he doesn't seem as young as he should be.
You know, this simply clears up a plot hole from 26 years ago.
See, Chekov was on the ship all along!
Fans tend to assume that Chekov was not one of the 300plus people on board the Enterprise in Season One. Why? Because we didn't see him. Of course we probably didn't see a lot of the crew. And of those we did see, we never saw many of them again. So either the attrition the the E was really bad or they just weren't in the shots we saw. I sure cant recall a scene where its implied the Chekov came aboard recently.
Someone had to explain to him in, "I, Mudd", about Harry Mudd (and the first adventure "Mudd's Women") but it could also refer to him being posted below decks at the time.
