Rush's terminology is a bit off. He meant 'thread'. (You might have noticed he also uses bloggers in lieu of the more conventional 'posters').
Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
Blog?
Rush's terminology is a bit off. He meant 'thread'. (You might have noticed he also uses bloggers in lieu of the more conventional 'posters').
Hey, Rush, I'm sure you haven't noticed it, but there are a whole slew of professional writers here on this board. Try to keep that in mind the next time you feel like lecturing here about how writers write.I'm sure Carey would have a different opinion if her ancestors were a minority in Japan and were imprisoned in much the same way.
This has been said before, and I'll say it again --just because the characters are true-to-the-period rascist, doesn't mean that Diane supported the internment camp thing. Just because she's white, doesn't mean she intended to give a rascist message.
Hey, Rush, I'm sure you haven't noticed it, but there are a whole slew of professional writers here on this board. Try to keep that in mind the next time you feel like lecturing here about how writers write.
my blog?
This has been said before, and I'll say it again --just because the characters are true-to-the-period rascist, doesn't mean that Diane supported the internment camp thing. Just because she's white, doesn't mean she intended to give a rascist message.
I'm sure Carey would have a different opinion if her ancestors were a minority in Japan and were imprisoned in much the same way.
This has been said before, and I'll say it again --just because the characters are true-to-the-period rascist, doesn't mean that Diane supported the internment camp thing. Just because she's white, doesn't mean she intended to give a rascist message.
Of course, the Japanese, Germans, and Italians did far worse to their prisoners just before and during World War II, but still.
This would seem to be something similar to the Guantanamo Bay controversy. No comment.
As if I needed more reason to dislike her! -- RR
*sigh*
Yeah, what they said.
This is one of those times where we will have to agree to disagree.
Also, several other posters have given me reason to believe that ours is the more proper opinion concerning that novel.
This is one of those times where we will have to agree to disagree.
Well then...I agree.
Also, several other posters have given me reason to believe that ours is the more proper opinion concerning that novel.
Again, I agree to disagree. I'm sure you are aware, as I am, that truth is not necessarily determined by majority vote. Look at TOS. The majority seemed to not care for Star Trek until the 70's.TOS was a great show, nonetheless.
Also, prior to the civil rights movement, the majority had a serious racism problem. (Dramatized in the Crucible: McCoy novel)
And, no, I did not read the EL WWII story. I was simply playing devil's advocate, as it were. Trying to defend the other side. You understand.
If I ever do find a copy, in the store, of the EL anthology, and find in Carey's tale a truly intentional pro-rascist message, then I will be quick to announce my utter dissapointment (to put it mildly...) in her. But until that happens (if it happens), than I will continue to defend her.
As the Founding Fathers cried, "No taxation without representation!"
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.