Nebraska Grey alien film

[Hermiod]

^That's always the problem, isn't it ?

People who really push theories about aliens, ghosts, 9/11 conspiracies, the New World Order, government mind control, faked moon landings and so on always seem to have a DVD and a book to sell, paid speeches to give and advertising laden websites for you to visit.

They're not interested in people proving their "theories" wrong because if they were, their livelihood goes away.

 

[Bad Bishop]

^That's always the problem, isn't it ?

People who really push theories about aliens, ghosts, 9/11 conspiracies, the New World Order, government mind control, faked moon landings and so on always seem to have a DVD and a book to sell, paid speeches to give and advertising laden websites for you to visit.

That also goes for people who promote the conventional wisdom, in spite of all contrary evidence.

They're not interested in people proving their "theories" wrong because if they were, their livelihood goes away.

You must be talking about SETI. Dr. Seth Shostak and his colleagues are not interested in evidence of aliens coming here to Earth. It would make all SETI efforts over the decades completely irrelevant.

 

[JoeZhang]

conventional wisdom, in spite of all contrary evidence.

What evidence? all we've seen on this thread is a) some stills and b) some guys hawking their DVDs and lining their pockets.

You must be talking about SETI. Dr. Seth Shostak and his colleagues are not interested in evidence of aliens coming here to Earth. It would make all SETI efforts over the decades completely irrelevant.

That's a joke right? evidence of communication would be the best thing in the world for those guys, it would lead to a massive leap in funding. Finding the communication would only be the first step.

But hey, since they do their science by you know peer-reviewed work rather than selling DVDS, I guess they must be cranks.

 

[voggmo]

Yep, they are headed for the journals Joe. & Paxil, the guy is having the video scutinized by scientists before releasing it, he is handling it correctly. It will be released shortly.

 

[JoeZhang]

Yep, they are headed for the journals Joe. & Paxil, the guy is having the video scutinized by scientists before releasing it, he is handling it correctly. It will be released shortly.

Which journals ? where?

You don't seem to understand that the video is evidence of nothing - it provides evidence that a physical object was passed in front of a window - that's it.

 

[Kryton]

I have a video of a huge alien attack on the planet of Acheron.

 

[Bad Bishop]

conventional wisdom, in spite of all contrary evidence.

What evidence? all we've seen on this thread is a) some stills and b) some guys hawking their DVDs and lining their pockets.

I'm talking about the great variety and quantity of UFO evidence in general, not the alleged Nebraska alien on tape.

And before you give us that line about "peer-reviewed" studies again, I'll just refer you to an appropriate website. Here, you can see for yourself that UFOs have been the subject of many scientific studies:

http://www.ufoevidence.org



.

 

[Reverend]

Thing is, a UFO is by definition not evidence of alien visitation. A UFO is an Unknown Flying Object, if you could prove it's an alien ship then it's not a UFO any more.
I've seen footage of all sorts of objects, most are obviously not alien, one was clearly a jet fighter firing it's after burners at night (though the amazed onlookers on the camcorder's audio insisted it was "expanding".) Point is, in an age where the number of cameras per person is increasing exponentially (how many people walk around with camera phones these days?) you'd think the amount of photographic evidence would increase in line with that. Such does not appear to be the case. And this comes from someone who lives in crop circle central.

Not that I'm against certain aspects of the paranormal, but the evidence just isn't very good. As for this Nebraska tape, it's hard to say anything before the original is released, but it doesn't sound very likely.

 

[Bad Bishop]

Thing is, a UFO is by definition not evidence of alien visitation. A UFO is an Unknown Flying Object, if you could prove it's an alien ship then it's not a UFO any more.

The well-known researcher Stanton Friedman says that he's more interested in "flying saucers" (a subset of UFOs, or those objects best explained as alien spacecraft) than UFOs in general. There have been lots of good cases of flying saucers. The question is, how many good cases are necessary before establishment science takes this seriously?

Not that I'm against certain aspects of the paranormal, but the evidence just isn't very good.

Maybe so, if you're judging by quantity. So what do would you suggest now? Should the subject be summarily dismissed?

 

[JoeZhang]

Here, you can see for yourself that UFOs have been the subject of many scientific studies:

http://www.ufoevidence.org

When I click the link to scientific studies - the newest seems to be in 1972!

The only newer material seems to be in some junk journal called "Journal of Scientific Exploration".

 

[Bad Bishop]

Here, you can see for yourself that UFOs have been the subject of many scientific studies:

http://www.ufoevidence.org

When I click the link to scientific studies - the newest seems to be in 1972!

The only newer material seems to be in some junk journal called "Journal of Scientific Exploration".

You should have explored the website more thoroughly.

The Sturrock Panel (headed by Stanford physicist Peter A. Sturrock) was organized to study UFO evidence in 1998, and this project became a book titled The UFO Enigma (1999):

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc530.htm

The COMETA report (from France) also goes back to 1999:

http://www.ufoevidence.org/topics/Cometa.htm

If there aren't more high-level UFO studies, you can blame (for starters) the stubborn scientific community and their ingrained, false beliefs about UFOs.

 

[JoeZhang]

false beliefs about UFOs.

So what's the truth?

 

[Hermiod]

^That's always the problem, isn't it ?

People who really push theories about aliens, ghosts, 9/11 conspiracies, the New World Order, government mind control, faked moon landings and so on always seem to have a DVD and a book to sell, paid speeches to give and advertising laden websites for you to visit.

That also goes for people who promote the conventional wisdom, in spite of all contrary evidence.

Come on, you can't be serious ? Take the faked moon landing people. Everything they say gets shot down. The way they behave is not even close to how the people they're attacking do.

I've never seen Buzz Aldrin shove a bible in anyone's face, for a start.

 

[Jax]

YES the truth is out there, ALIENS have flown millions of miles in space to play peeping tom through a weird guys window.


...This is the NUT house calling, your room is ready

PS - why are ALIENS always midgets ?

 

[TheSeeker]

^That's always the problem, isn't it ?

People who really push theories about aliens, ghosts, 9/11 conspiracies, the New World Order, government mind control, faked moon landings and so on always seem to have a DVD and a book to sell, paid speeches to give and advertising laden websites for you to visit.

That also goes for people who promote the conventional wisdom, in spite of all contrary evidence.

Come on, you can't be serious ? Take the faked moon landing people. Everything they say gets shot down. The way they behave is not even close to how the people they're attacking do.

I've never seen Buzz Aldrin shove a bible in anyone's face, for a start.

No, just his fist! The guy deserved it though.

 

[Bad Bishop]

false beliefs about UFOs.

So what's the truth?

I'll tell you what is demonstrably false about UFOs, because these falsehoods and misconceptions form the basis for widespread opinion on the subject:

• There is nothing mysterious about UFOs
• Most UFO sightings can be easily explained as hoaxes or conventional objects, and if any cannot be explained it is merely because of "insufficient information"
• UFOs never leave physical evidence or any other evidence that can be studied in a laboratory
• Astronomers and scientists never see UFOs
• UFO believers are all cranks, freaks and nuts
• The U.S. government has had zero interest in UFOs since Project Blue Book was closed in 1969

And so on. For more, I would just recommend Stanton T. Friedman's new book, Flying Saucers and Science, to anyone who is interested in the views of one scientist who has studied the subject for more than 40 years.

 

[voggmo]

They're not interested in people proving their "theories" wrong because if they were, their livelihood goes away.

This is ridiculous. There is no money in it. Bob Lazar got ridiculed & never got rich. Sorry no dice whatsoever on this theory. Where's the scientific evidence? UFO lectures are not big sellers. As for books, only Whitley Streiber had a best seller. They're interested in the subject & seeking the truth, has nothing to do with money.

& the debunkers are often so retarded, Phillip Klass is a bufoon.



As for Moon landings, most of the Astronauts did see UFO's during the landing & spoke about them as well. I suppose they are looking to make a buck eh? Ridiculous.



http://ufos.about.com/od/nasaufos/a/apollo11.htm
The documentary quotes Buzz Aldrin as stating without reservation that the Astronauts saw a UFO that paced them for a time during their journey to the Moon.

 

[Hermiod]

No, just his fist! The guy deserved it though.

Totally.

 

[voggmo]

When the studies are done & published, then we'll know when & where Joe. University labs have already done much work shown in previous posts. & being published in a journal does not carry as much weight as actual studies done by University scientists & labs does.

Posted by Reverend...
you'd think the amount of photographic evidence would increase in line with that. Such does not appear to be the case.

This is not true. Video of ufo's has increased tremendously in last decade. Mexico particularly. Some very good film. & they have been examined by film experts as well.



http://www.ufocasebook.com/bestmexicobuilding.mpeg
This one was analyzed by the special effects team that did Independence day,( best in the world by the way), & found to be untampered with. It's real & it's obviously intelligently controlled, hence not a naturally occurring phenomena. Their view & study carries more weight than a scientific journal does.

More here.
http://www.ufocasebook.com/bestufovideos2.html

 

[Capt. Vulcan]

His story doesn't sounds right. So he thought he had a reoccurring peeping tom trying to look at his two beautiful teenage daughters. (Supposedly hundreds of times already.) His response isn't to call the police... but to consult some "researchers and scientists" who tell him to set up the camera with nightshot?

Ok... so why consult scientists to figure out what to do with a peeping tom? Not only that, it really took some consulting with smart people to come up with a plan to set up a video camera to visit and peeping tom that has visited you over a hundred times? Considering how slow this guy sounds, these "scientists" might really just be his closest neighbor that wears glasses and doesn't wipe his nose on his own sleeve.

Suuuuuure, the researchers and scientists need him to not show anyone the video before they get to examine this extraordinary video. This "agreement" sounds more like an issue with dollars and cents here. In that case they should cash in and turn this in to a play.

Invasion Nebraska!: The movie

Vaguely dumpy looking middle age man (Jeff Peckman) sits in bed reading "good parenting quarterly."

Jeff Peckman: (inquisitive) Aaah, so one daughter shall go to Yale, the other to Harvard.

*puts down magazine on night stand next to dual "best dad in the world" mugs*

JP: Good thing such fine periodicals exist to help me raise my two beautiful twin teenage daughters. Why, I don't kno-

*JP is startled mid sentence as he sees something briefly in the mirror*

JP: What is this? Peeping toms!? In Nebraska?! Why I never!

*JP runs out in his PJ's to catch the would be peeping tom, [scene changes to night time exterior] JP runs around the corner and finds the interloper has already left.*

JP: Alas, I was too slow! If only I had been a mite quicker. No matter... my action has obviously scared the deviant away. My daughters shall sleep soundly tonight.

Scene change: It is the next night, JP is similarly reclined in bed, this time reading a copy of Skeptic magazine.

JP: Yes, reason is clearly the way to go. I must approa-

*JP is again startled by something in the bedroom window, he leaps to his feet and runs outside with no hesitation.*

JP: Not this time deviant!

*JP once again runs around the corner to find it empty.*

JP: Curses! Once again too slow! This cretin is more persistent than I expected. Also he is none to bright... as this is the second night in a row that he has peeped in to my window instead of that of my daughters. I must continue to protect my family regardless. Vigilance!

(This scene repeats with minor variation one hundred and fifty more times.)

On the occasion of the one hundred and fifty third night.

JP: Clearly, this "running out side as fast as I can" plan has a flaw. I believe it is time to consult my local constabulary... and ask them where I can find the nearest scientist or researcher.

Scene change: Interior of a lab. The lab is filled with bubbling cauldrons of smoke, a scientist with thick glasses is speaking with JP, we join them mid conversation.

Scientist: Peeping tom you say? One hundred and fifty three times you counted? Beautiful daughters you have?

JP: Yes, extraordinary isn't it? Although at least one of the times I think it may have been my own reflection in the bottle of grain alcohol I had been consuming all night.

S: You came to the right place. Clearly there's only one solution, might you have a video camera with night vision capabilities?

JP: Why of course! I am a member of the sports club after all.

S: You must set up the camera and record at night. Then bring me the tape. Be sure not to show anyone else until I have examined it yet.

JP: Very well, what must be done, must be done. If only for the sake of all that's right and just in this world.

Next day, same laboratory. The scientist looks disappointed.

S: This video just shows the windows. I was thinking the camera would be pointed towards the bed.

JP: How would a video of my sleeping help enlighten us in this situation?

S: Your sleeping? But I thought it was peeping on... ok, nevermind. Um... you know what? Let me hold on to this tape, and don't let anyone know about it till I'm done examining it.

JP: Certainly. Thank you my good man.

S: Yeah, whatever.

[scene changes to a dark bedroom interior, only lit by a computer screen. A douchebag sits in front of it typing away furiously]

Douche: Ha ha... hilarious. This will be so great. I'll refresh this page a million times a day to see who reads it! (Giggles in an disconcerting fashion.) Then I'll reference myself in self deprecating fashion so as to deflect any criticism before it even comes! Mwa ha ha ha!

[somewhere in a dusty attic there is a portrait of this man getting dumber.]

The End