In other news, I just got a semi-new laptop yesterday (a former GSA office drone Dell Latitude CPi, running Win XP Pro with a DVD ROM drive; not bad for fifty bucks
), so once I get it up to snuff, I should be able to cook up something.

This is what Archer's Enterprise should have looked like!OK, here's Aethernaut's take:
![]()
Very interesting, indeed.
You know what? I would love to see elements of this design combined with elements of Karim Nassar's take on the Daedalus and Forbin's kitbashed S.S. Reeses.
There are elements in each of these ships that I like which are absent from the others.
From Aethernaut's drawings, I like the lines and the textures. I especially like the connecting tube. Aethernaut made it thick and gave it a distinctive structure.
Karim Nassar invented a another very interesting idea: He took the nacelle pylons and moved them further back on the tube, and moved the tube so it sits on top of the secondary hull, rather then just flowing into the upper-bow of it. I also really like the textures of the hulls and nacelles on Nassar's design, and the shape of the front of the secondary hull.
Forbin's S.S. Reeses is really special. I like how the dish is back on the front of the secondary hull and how the connecting tube is elevated, leading into the very bottom deck of the pseudo-saucerette, thus allowing clearance for the navi-deflector.
I'd love to see a design that combines these things into one post-ENT ship.
It would be neat to see a Daedalus (or variant of same) that has a saucerette like Forbin's, but maybe shaped a little more spherically and with some of the textures from the other two. The connecting tube could combine
Aethernaut's and Nassar's designs, and the secondary hull could put a Forbin-like dish on the front of Nassar's design, with warp nacelles like a cross between the three, if that's possible.
THis is what Archer's Enterprise should have looked like!So long as it's properly credited, there's no issue.
OK, here's Aethernaut's take:
![]()
Which would bring us right back to the same reason the design was rejected forty-odd years ago, i.e., it's rather dorky overall, no matter how you gussy it up.
Which would bring us right back to the same reason the design was rejected forty-odd years ago, i.e., it's rather dorky overall, no matter how you gussy it up.
I've always liked the design myself.
I'm really starting to get tired of this phrase, no matter what design it gets applied to.This is what Archer's Enterprise should have looked like!
I'm really starting to get tired of this phrase, no matter what design it gets applied to.This is what Archer's Enterprise should have looked like!
Are we then assuming that there is a disconnect, or a loose connection, between the Starship Daedalus and the Daedalus-class of Federation starships, of which the U.S.S. Essex was a member?
I'll have to try that space bar and/or mouse button bit.
UPDATE: Didn't work.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.