what about the arrowverse
what about the arrowverse
I forgot about that too. And I know recall that in the Whedon version, we hear Danny Elfman's Batman theme for a few seconds when Batman shows up at the Batsignal.
By Arrowverse-Crisis rules, if it were a rewritten history of the same universe, its individuals would still look the same, just have different memories. It would have to be a separate Earth that just happened to have certain individuals and events in common, like how Superman & Lois's Earth and Earth-Prime had identical Clark, Lois, and Diggle, but very different versions of Sam Lane, Maxwell Lord, Lex Luthor, etc. Or, as I mentioned, like how Young Justice's Earth-16 includes some of the same individuals and events as Green Lantern: The Animated Series, but is otherwise a distinct reality.
Another new Clayface poster:
I gotta say, after the Supergirl posters were rather lazy and uninspired, all the Clayface posters thus far have been fantastic.
Meanwhile, Chairman/CEO for HBO and HBO Max Content Casey Bloys gave some perspective concerning the abandoned and/or put-on-ice projects at DC Studios during an interview at the Emmys
He also pointed out that aside from the Jimmy Olsen/Gorilla Grodd series, there was no DC Studios TV show in active development.
Source: Deadline (via Bleeding Cool)
I gotta say, after the Supergirl posters were rather lazy and uninspired, all the Clayface posters thus far have been fantastic.
Meanwhile, Chairman/CEO for HBO and HBO Max Content Casey Bloys gave some perspective concerning the abandoned and/or put-on-ice projects at DC Studios during an interview at the Emmys
He also pointed out that aside from the Jimmy Olsen/Gorilla Grodd series, there was no DC Studios TV show in active development.
Source: Deadline (via Bleeding Cool)
Or movies. They've most likely paused these things until the merger gets sorted out.
Oh yeah you're right, I forgot that part of it.
That was kind of my opinion of the film. It was just kind of like somebody said at every stage, "this is good enough, let's move on" rather than caring enough to make it something special.
Last edited:
Yeah, well, it was still me who said that, not DigificWriter.
Oops. I'm on my phone and old. I apologize for that. I'll edit that when I'm on my computer to fix it.
Hard to explain why but that empty white space reminds of ad for a tv show not a movie poster.
No, you didn't, you responded to me. You even quoted my post in yours.
No, you didn't, you responded to me. You even quoted my post in yours.
Oh, whoops, I confused two different conversational threads. Trying again:
That difference hardly matters. It's all made-up stories, so they can incorporate whatever elements they want. There's no "wrong" way to tell a completely imaginary story.
Also, you're mistaken. I cited the Psycho franchise, whose original movie was an adaptation of the Robert Bloch novel.
Why? He's the person they chose to tell the stories going forward. It's not "ego" to use your own ideas when the whole job you've been hired to do is to contribute your own ideas. I mean, there are lots of cases of comics creators taking characters or story ideas they intended to do at Marvel and ending up doing them at DC instead, or vice-versa. Heck, I've incorporated a number of my unused original fiction ideas into my Star Trek novels. It's natural enough for writers to draw on our own past work. Ideas have to come from somewhere.
It's how Nightcrawler ended up in the X-Men instead of Legion of Superheroes.
I didn't know that.
Weren't Jack Kirby's New Gods at DC a reworking of plans he'd had for Thor at Marvel?
As well as Storm and Colossus. Artist Dave Cockrum created the three for Legion membership when he was drawing that book, but DC didn't run with it. When Cockrum got the X-Men gig at Marvel, he took those characters with him. With modifications, of course. Storm originally had the power to turn into a cat, hence the shape of her eyes.
