What is your personal head canon?

[XCV330]

The Enterprise-J, in my head canon, still happens by 2550 and looks just like it does in "Azati Prime(ENT)." It's a case of Trek tech that's destined to exist whether or not there's a Delphic Expanse that's overrun most of the Milky Way Galaxy and a war with the Sphere Builders. Same design, same external appearance, same registry and dimensions. Just in an era of peace or, at least, no war with transdimensional aliens who build huge spheres.

A ship like the J would have been built to last too, maybe centuries. You don't build a ship that big for the pitiful run some of the Enterprises got. I could see them doing a series where J as a multi-generational city-ship went to one of the Magellanic Clouds and only now was coming back, if we ever got to see trek past the point of SFA, again.

 

[cooleddie74]

It's kind of wild that the 1701-J looks even more advanced than many ships we see in the late 32nd century. Drexler's design is divisive, but damn, does it feel advanced for a Starfleet vessel.

 

[1001001]

My head canon?

Everything on screen happened exactly as it appeared to.

 

[Finn]

It's kind of wild that the 1701-J looks even more advanced than many ships we see in the late 32nd century. Drexler's design is divisive, but damn, does it feel advanced for a Starfleet vessel.

Different timeline. The Expanse still exists.


Silly

 

[Set Harth]

My head canon?

Everything on screen happened exactly as it appeared to.

View attachment 54220

okely dokely

 

[cooleddie74]

Different timeline. The Expanse still exists.


Silly

That's the point of my head canon. The ship is one of those Trek things that exists no matter how a timeline goes. It's predetermined, like so many other things in the franchise. So the Expanse doesn't need to exist anymore.

 

[knightgrace]

My head canon?

Everything on screen happened exactly as it appeared to.

View attachment 54220

I thought you knew. 2 + 2 more often than not equals five, and even more often three, rarely the actual answer of four.

This was the true cause of WW III. Not Kahn.

 

[Paul Weaver]

My head canon?

Everything on screen happened exactly as it appeared to.

View attachment 54220

 

[1001001]

I thought you knew. 2 + 2 more often than not equals five, and even more often three, rarely the actual answer of four.

This was the true cause of WW III. Not Kahn.

 

[Set Harth]

2 + 2 more often than not equals five, and even more often three, rarely the actual answer of four.

Then what makes four the actual answer?

 

[Turtletrekker]

Then what makes four the actual answer?

The Temporal Cold War?

 

[The Salt Umpire]

View attachment 54227

A simple tailor gets it

 

[Australis]

In TOS, the Enterprise had 11 sister ships. They too were having exactly the same kinds of adventures, they didn't just all happen to the 1701.

 

[Set Harth]

Maybe not exactly the same. Possibly a bit more mundane...

 

[Rowdy Roddy McDowall]

Then what makes four the actual answer?

Classic mathematics?

 

[The Salt Umpire]

Then what makes four the actual answer?

The actual answer is 42

 

[Ray Hardgrit]

Maybe not exactly the same. Possibly a bit more mundane...

I think the main difference is that their adventures sometimes ended with them all dying.

 

[XCV330]

Different timeline. The Expanse still exists.


Silly

 

[Guy Gardener]

My head canon?

Everything on screen happened exactly as it appeared to.

View attachment 54220

If Maggie is ageing normally, then every episode of the Simpsons set during "present day" has all happened within the same 3 to 6 month period, many of these stories logjamming within the same day, out of order, just like Pulp Fiction.

 

[Ray Hardgrit]

If Maggie is ageing normally, then every episode of the Simpsons set during "present day" has all happened within the same 3 to 6 month period, many of these stories logjamming within the same day, out of order, just like Pulp Fiction.

This is why I only watch the first 183 episodes.