• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

DC Cinematic Universe ( The James Gunn era)

I mean, it's Clayface, of course it was going to be body horror. That does not mean it won't be psychological horror, too. The best body horror films are also go into the psychological aspects, like Cronenberg's The Fly, Titane, or The Substance. And I feel the teaser did very much go into similar territory as the TAS version. I mean, that staring eye of the bandaged Matt Hagen (presumably) is such a great depiction of trauma, it does suggest it won't just be a superficial display of make-up effects.
I get that but, for me, the question is how graphic that body horror will be. The Fly is great but I can never, ever watch that film again no matter how much I love Jeff Goldblum precisely because of that body horror.

I'll keep an open mind but I'm wary at this point.

I also felt like I had seen the actor before, and looking up Wikipedia, Tom Rhys Harries was the incredibly good-looking and surprisingly competent star influencer in the Doctor Who episode Dot and Bubble. I liked him there, and he seems like the perfect choice for this character.
I've meant to look him because I also thought he looked familiar so thank you for answering that question. He was great in that episode.
 
It's surprising to me how many DC productions lately I'm just not interested in. Aside from the Super-person movies, they're mostly favoring genres or styles that don't appeal to me.
Yeah, I have to admit I have also been a little shocked by the direction they've gone with some of their stuff. When you say DC Comics shows and movies, I definitely would not immediately think of a gritty True Detective style crime drama starring a couple Green Lanterns, or a body horror movie focused on Clayface.
 
Yeah, I have to admit I have also been a little shocked by the direction they've gone with some of their stuff. When you say DC Comics shows and movies, I definitely would not immediately think of a gritty True Detective style crime drama starring a couple Green Lanterns, or a body horror movie focused on Clayface.

I dunno, it feels consistent with how DC comics (particularly Batman comics) have spent the past few decades striving to copy the dark and gritty tone of Watchmen, The Dark Knight Returns, and Batman Year One, out of a self-conscious need to prove how Serious and Mature they are, or just ride the coattails of their biggest successes. And onscreen, they've been doing stuff like that for a while, with the Nolan movies and The Batman in cinemas and the adult tone of cable shows like Titans and Doom Patrol. Even Arrow strove for a Nolanesque tone, though the Arrowverse that grew out of it was willing to embrace the lighter side of DC and became far more fun and lively as a result.

There's nothing wrong with having a range of styles and tones to appeal to different tastes, but lately it seems that DC isn't offering much that appeals to my tastes.
 
Strange to give a C list Batman villain like Clayface his own movie rather than just putting him in a Batman movie.
Normally, I would call it a Sony decision but I trust Gunn's instincts on this film and I can see it working. There's enough drama in the psychological horror for it to stand on its own.
 
Strange to give a C list Batman villain like Clayface his own movie rather than just putting him in a Batman movie.

No stranger than giving Venom a solo movie. I've always said, the Sony Spider-Man-adjacent movies would've been better if they hadn't tried to push them into the superhero mold but had just embraced the potential of the characters to drive standalone movies in various different genres. Taking a character like Clayface and building a body-horror movie around him is just the sort of thing I was thinking about.

And "C-list" doesn't matter. Iron Man was at most a B-list character before 2008; the Guardians of the Galaxy were probaby D-list before their movie. The movie audience is literally thousands of times bigger than the comics audience, so most people who see a superhero movie will never have read the comics it's based on. So the character's past is irrelevant; all that matters is what the movie does with them.
 
Honestly I am enjoying the uncertainty about of who she is playing. Not at all about preserving spoilers. But because I am so sick of entertainment news and social media (fandom) being so sure they can leak and decipher every detail before the film makers want it out. Even if one of those theories is true it never stops there. Than that snowballs into “figuring out” the plot and direction, etc. To the point people are deciding if they want see the movie at all based on what they made up in their own heads.

And then they're mad or disappointed because the actual movie isn't the movie that internet rumors and speculation "promised" them . . . .
 
Is this poke at a certain Tolkien franchise or do they not know there’s a corp?

IMG-3460.jpg
 
Is this poke at a certain Tolkien franchise or do they not know there’s a corp?

As I understand it, there's normally only one Lantern per species, so more than one human having a ring is an anomaly. Maybe the arc of the series will start out with that "only one" rule in effect, but show how John Stewart earns the right to be a second human Lantern. (Except, wait, no, this is the same universe where Guy Gardner is also a Lantern, so I guess that doesn't work.)
 
As I understand it, there's normally only one Lantern per species, so more than one human having a ring is an anomaly. Maybe the arc of the series will start out with that "only one" rule in effect, but show how John Stewart earns the right to be a second human Lantern. (Except, wait, no, this is the same universe where Guy Gardner is also a Lantern, so I guess that doesn't work.)
There are currently seven humans in the Green Lantern Corps in the comics.
Hal Jordan
Guy Gardner
John Stewart
Kyle Rayner
Jessica Cruz (also currently leader of the Corps)
Simon Baz
Sojourner Mullein
Eight, if we count Keli Quintela, the Teen Lantern, but technically she wears a gauntlet instead of a ring.
 
Strange to give a C list Batman villain like Clayface his own movie rather than just putting him in a Batman movie.
I think he's probably more well known than that, he's appeared in Gotham, Pennyworth, plays a big role in Arkham City, and has appeared in a shit ton of animated series.
As I understand it, there's normally only one Lantern per species, so more than one human having a ring is an anomaly. Maybe the arc of the series will start out with that "only one" rule in effect, but show how John Stewart earns the right to be a second human Lantern. (Except, wait, no, this is the same universe where Guy Gardner is also a Lantern, so I guess that doesn't work.)
It's not one per species, each Lantern has a sector of space that they're assigned too. I'm not quite sure how Earth has ended up with so many Lanterns though. I'm not positive, but I think Hal Jordan, John Stewart, Guy Gardner, and Kyle Rayner started out one at a time, because their predecessor has died or quit, but then over time they all came back and then they introduced even more while the others were still active. I just counted on Wikipedia and there are now 8 active Earth, or Sector 2814, Green Lanterns.
EDIT: Oops, looks like Kai and I were writing out posts at the same time.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top