Or maybe he just destroyed all his crappy works and all we get to see are his various master pieces?Even Leonardo couldn’t paint a Mona Lisa every time. Who can?
Or maybe he just destroyed all his crappy works and all we get to see are his various master pieces?
Side-note: But I absolutely hated that Federation/Maquis set-up & was very happy it was dropped almost immediately!Heck, all the other Berman Era shows started out stronger than TNG did. Even VOY, which really impressed me early on before lumbering into lazy "Diet TNG" storytelling habits and failing to properly exploit the Maquis and mismatched crews angles.
Enterprise is one of my friends favorite Trek. He keeps trying to get me to watch more of it.This is true. A few years back, I had occasion to rewatch some ENTERPRISE episodes for research purposes and found it held up better than I expected.
Now that I wasn't expecting it to be a bold, new, 21st-century take on the Trek, I enjoyed it more.
Whenever they cast off the need to be an updated version of the original series and leaned into being TNG, the show worked. First season TNG had an identity crisis that none of the other sequels did. Enterprise did seem to struggle with an identity at first - or maybe it was confidence - but since the people in charge had years of Trek under their belts, it wasn't as bad. But the network also wouldn't let Enterprise be what Berman and Braga wanted. It also would have helped if the two guys running the series actually liked, or at least knew, the show they were saying they were a prequel to....Enterprise is one of my friends favorite Trek. He keeps trying to get me to watch more of it.
If I wasn't making my way through B5, I would.
I did watch a couple of episodes from season 1 last year, and it holds up much better than season 1 of TNG.
There is a great book called the Twilight Zone Companion, one of the most endearing aspects of which is the author's willingness to point out just how much utter crap there is in TZ, despite the book being written for and by Twilight Zone superfans.All TV series have bad episodes. The greatest TV shows in history have legendary turds. Hell, the original Twilight Zone, a show even more legendary and publicly liked than Trek, has a lot of shitty episodes.
That was the great thing about having 28 - 35 episodes (or more depending) a season. You can have a good number of turds, failed comedies and ill-conceived ideas and still wind up with a well loved classic because the majority don't suck.
This was the third book on a TV show I bought as a younger and I absorbed it. Every time my copy gets dog-eared, I buy another. One of the best books on a TV show ever, IMHO.There is a great book called the Twilight Zone Companion, one of the most endearing aspects of which is the author's willingness to point out just how much utter crap there is in TZ, despite the book being written for and by Twilight Zone superfans.
Interesting timing!And some of the truly great episodes aren't the ones normally ending up in a Top 10 list. "The Hunt" by Earl Hamner, Jr., is an episode that ranks up there, IMHO, with the episodes landing on most fans' Best Of compilations.

ultimately it comes down to the writing. Good writing can encapsulate any demographic and make the experience enjoyable. I think this is something that 'modern' writers fail to realize or embrace.I grew up on Star Trek, TOS as a youngster, TNG as a younger adult, then DS9, VOY... later I even watched ENT... but I'm not into cartoons, Discovery was painful and I dropped it after the first few episodes. I watched the first season of SNW but loved all three seasons of Picard. But now as a senior citizen, I'm finding I just can not seem to bite on the new stuff. Am I the only one who has issues with the new stuff or just a basic, meh?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.