How? They building one using stone knives and bear skins?
General Trek Questions and Observations
- Thread starter The Old Mixer
- Start date
Or a rudimentary lathe /s
How would a lathe help? I'll lathe that to you.
No, you forgot something important a tool and die man.
For those who don't know a Tool and Die man makes precision tools. And can design new tools.
They are absolute artists.
No, you forgot something important a tool and die man.
For those who don't know a Tool and Die man makes precision tools. And can design new tools.
They are absolute artists.
I want to know the Great Untold Story of Lieutenant Leslie. Killed as dead as a rock in Obsession only to reappear later alive and well. Hugh Culber had the mycelial network, Spock had the Genesis device, Shaxs had the Black Mountain and three faceless apparitions of his father. But what's Leslie's story?
I know that there was an unfilmed scene in which McCoy would find a miracle cure for the red shirts, and that explanation works as well as any, but it's not as fun as coming up with some sort of existential epic.
I know that there was an unfilmed scene in which McCoy would find a miracle cure for the red shirts, and that explanation works as well as any, but it's not as fun as coming up with some sort of existential epic.
1)Romulans messed up the timeline
2)the first one was a LMD
3)Mother Talzin
4)he was only mostly dead
^ Perhaps there was a trip to Tahiti involved.
There's a million of themI want to know the Great Untold Story of Lieutenant Leslie. Killed as dead as a rock in Obsession only to reappear later alive and well. Hugh Culber had the mycelial network, Spock had the Genesis device, Shaxs had the Black Mountain and three faceless apparitions of his father. But what's Leslie's story?
I know that there was an unfilmed scene in which McCoy would find a miracle cure for the red shirts, and that explanation works as well as any, but it's not as fun as coming up with some sort of existential epic.
Leslies... all the way down.There's a million of them
Gentlemen, there are odds one of you may not survive. How we will tell who was lost will keep me doing paperwork for weeks.There's a million of them
There's a million of them
Kirk: "Okay, men, today we will be training in the experimental hard-light holographic projection room with a program titled: Indiana Jones on a Tank. All you have to do is just stand in a line..."
How far does holodeck simulation go?
Would the holodeck be able to recreate a game like any of the Forza Horizon games, and would the cars be real, and if the cars are real would any pollution from racing be real?
I just wonder how far simulations would go in regards to the holodeck and how much could re replicated for real without being actual holograms? For example could you recreate a real car if you wanted to say learn about them, or any other kind of earth vehicle from the past?
Would the holodeck be able to recreate a game like any of the Forza Horizon games, and would the cars be real, and if the cars are real would any pollution from racing be real?
I just wonder how far simulations would go in regards to the holodeck and how much could re replicated for real without being actual holograms? For example could you recreate a real car if you wanted to say learn about them, or any other kind of earth vehicle from the past?
Tom Paris was working on a 1969 Camaro on the holodeck.
As long as the safetys functioned properly harmful pollutants would not be produced.
Just far enough to almost kill you.
Then Forza Horizon 5 it is....... only set it so you can win almost every race and no rubber banding, cheating AI.
Next I'd play Horizon Zero Dawn
I'm quite sure there were no turboprop bombers in World War II.
But there were turbochargers. Also superchargers. There was a British Mathematician whose specialty was computational fluid dynamics - before computers. Who took one look at what had to be done with either system and jettisoned the turbochargers due to the bulk of the ducting required for them to work. He went instead to the mechanical supercharger, but two of them on a single drive shaft. What this meant for the Supermarine Spitfire, was that this fighter plane was no longer a low to medium attitude fighter, but could now handle high attitude. Thus, becoming a truly effective fighter.
But why not the turbocharger? First off the ducting. But secondly the weight of the turbo/compresser system, which as you now know was too heavy to be easily spun up unless the engine was at a high throttle setting. Then there was the problem of highly compressed air...being too hot, requiring "intercoolers" to cool it down for usability. Exploding your engine is a bad idea...
The point being that high energy systems should have similar problems. Hence Scotty.
But why not the turbocharger? First off the ducting. But secondly the weight of the turbo/compresser system, which as you now know was too heavy to be easily spun up unless the engine was at a high throttle setting. Then there was the problem of highly compressed air...being too hot, requiring "intercoolers" to cool it down for usability. Exploding your engine is a bad idea...
The point being that high energy systems should have similar problems. Hence Scotty.
Pedantic much?
Propellers mounted on the wings of the bombers. My apologies for using the wrong word.
There were turbojet powered bombers such as the German Arado 234 in 1943 but those were turbojets which used exhaust gases to produce thrust, not spinning props. The first mass produced turboprop was the Vickers Viscount. It first flew in 1948.
Vickers Viscount - Wikipedia
You might like this series on the Thunderbolt
P-47 Thunderbolt
This is a playlist of my P-47 Thunderbolt series. It starts off with a video that's relevant, but not specific to the P-47.
youtube.com
