• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

20 years ago tonight the Enterprise finale aired. So....what's your opinion two decades on?

The series finalé tainted the series as a whole. Starting with the last episode of season 2, Enterprise really found its footing and became an excellent Star Trek series. Seasons 3 and 4 were nearly as good as TOS and TNG in their primes. While I greatly prefer stand-alone episodes for Trek, Enterprise did the serial format very well. They had set up the story arch to prepare for the Romulan war, which could have been very exciting and could have really fleshed out that part of the Star Trek universe. I think it would have been great. Shran was also supposed to become a regular in season 5, which also could have been quite interesting. But all of this was tainted by the finalé, which felt like a mediocre TNG episode. "The Pegasus" was an OK episode, but it felt shoehorned into Enterprise. It felt like the were trying to say that Enterprise wasn't good enough by itself to have a final episode that would be good. It felt like they needed a TNG episode to bail them out. I understand that the ratings had dropped because of the mediocre first two seasons, but they could have at least allowed it the dignity to have a series finalé that was an Enterprise episode rather than a TNG episode. Voyager's ratings dropped towards the end, but they allowed it to have a dignified ending. TATV was a stain on an otherwise great season.

Yep, this is all pretty much common knowledge for the last 20+ years.
 
Looking back it it now, I find it hilarious that the show was basically a bunch of deleted scenes from a TNG episode. Shame it wasn't regarded as such by the other shows and deservedly ignored as canon.
 
I’m confused. Are you backpedaling your statement about it not being canon?

As for the ‘damage,’ TATV was bad, but it didn’t damage the franchise. The creative decisions of Rick Berman and UPN did that. TATV was just a symptom of a much larger problem.
I'm saying that it isn't canon in my eyes regardless of the IP holders opinion and stance of the shows legitimacy regarding canon.

You can excuse a few little mistakes here and there in an single episode or line of dialog, when it comes the the premise of an entire TV show with 4 series and 10 movies before it being based on something as preposterous of depicting a ship that never existed in the universe history, it is profoundly incompetent and shows a lack of care given to the integrity of said universe.
 
I'm saying that it isn't canon in my eyes regardless of the IP holders opinion and stance of the shows legitimacy regarding canon.

You can excuse a few little mistakes here and there in an single episode or line of dialog, when it comes the the premise of an entire TV show with 4 series and 10 movies before it being based on something as preposterous of depicting a ship that never existed in the universe history, it is profoundly incompetent and shows a lack of care given to the integrity of said universe.
"Integrity," you say?

MjBiODYwMzAtZDUxZS00NzM5LTlmNzktMmQzMDEwY2QzZGI3_fb39c53dab2b3976abe265539cdf57f4.jpgitok_gma5yby

MV5BMjMxNTA3NTAyM15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNDI1MTA1MDE@._V1_.jpg

Threshold_%28Shuttle_Kidnap%29.jpg
 
I'm saying that it isn't canon in my eyes regardless of the IP holders opinion and stance of the shows legitimacy regarding canon.

You can excuse a few little mistakes here and there in an single episode or line of dialog, when it comes the the premise of an entire TV show with 4 series and 10 movies before it being based on something as preposterous of depicting a ship that never existed in the universe history, it is profoundly incompetent and shows a lack of care given to the integrity of said universe.

You are welcome to think it’s not canon. I don’t argue about people’s headcanon. But you made it sound like CBS/ Paramount didn’t think it was canon, and that was incorrect.
 
Star Trek Enterprise was great. Fuck critics

Fandom is like this in most franchise type shows... you think we're bad here the Star Wars fans love to whinge even more when things get changed even the tiniest little bit. And don't get me started on Dr Who fans they are shocking. I left the reddit forums for a month or two because people just can't stop whinging
 
You are welcome to think it’s not canon. I don’t argue about people’s headcanon. But you made it sound like CBS/ Paramount didn’t think it was canon, and that was incorrect.
Everything about that finale was an insult. To Trip and T'Pol, to the NX-01 crew, to Shran, and to us. When Jonathan Frakes, the John Ratzenburger of Star Trek, freely admits he shouldn't have been there, you know it was a massive screwing of the pooch.

Not saying it wasn't canon. But it sure shouldn't be!
 
That final episode is easy to disregard from the canon is anyone chooses, including for the producers of Trek. A tale told from Riker's point of view, 200 years after the fact, it's probably as accurate as any historical biopic set in 1805 made in 2005.

Given Bashir and O'Brien asking Worf about Klingon flat-heads, when Starfleet was involved in the events behind it all testifies as to the lack of accuracy of historical accounts in the 24th Century.

That's before we get to the idea of Riker re-writing the program to satisfy his own fantasies (the horndog probably wanted to get rid of the competition to get himself a piece of Vulcan totty)
 
That final episode is easy to disregard from the canon is anyone chooses, including for the producers of Trek. A tale told from Riker's point of view, 200 years after the fact, it's probably as accurate as any historical biopic set in 1805 made in 2005.
Also, it's entirely conceivable that characters like Phlox and Mayweather were no longer on the Enterprise in 2161. Phlox would likely have returned to his extended family, and Mayweather would probably be someone's first officer. But since they're with Archer for his most crucial missions, Riker adds them to the program.
 
I'll probably get into quite some trouble when I say I didn't find TATV *that* bad.

Okay, it was absolutely terrible as a series finale ... but had it been broadcast somewhen mid-season, it would probably have been an okay crossover episode. Except for Trip's death, of course.
 
I'll probably get into quite some trouble when I say I didn't find TATV *that* bad.

Okay, it was absolutely terrible as a series finale ... but had it been broadcast somewhen mid-season, it would probably have been an okay crossover episode. Except for Trip's death, of course.
That's a common belief here, actually. Set the episode in 2155, delete Trip's death, and create a new explanation for the Shran plot, and you've got a satisfactory piece of fanservice. And Jonathan Frakes gets to be in yet another Trek series.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top