• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What if section 31 caused Ceti Alpha VI to supernova?

1) Planets don't go supernova.

2) Why not just blow up Ceti Alpha V itself? Or, if plausible deniability or whatever is somehow a concern, why not blow up Ceti Alpha VI in such a way as to make certain planet V is destroyed outright as collateral damage? :shrug:
 
1) Planets don't go supernova.

2) Why not just blow up Ceti Alpha V itself? Or, if plausible deniability or whatever is somehow a concern, why not blow up Ceti Alpha VI in such a way as to make certain planet V is destroyed outright as collateral damage? :shrug:
Number 2 could have been what they were trying to do but failed. It would make a good audio story or book.
 
Ehhh. I'm kind of tired of the idea of S31 being responsible for everything. Greg Cox's To Reign in Hell proposed a natural though improbable(?) scenario, while the Vanguard books proposed another possibility I found interesting.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top