• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

Just hilarious the hair splitting. If I say I think the pylons on the TOS Enterprise look too thin then it's magic high tech materials that are super strong.

But, detached nacelles? That's absurd!


:shrug:
 
Okay, so I asked him to tone it down, and then you repeat the same behavior in the very next post?

Knock it off.
i apologize. this attack upon their vessel was not authorized by my government.

in fairness to me, your statement was not visible while i was typing that up. but i should have left that part as something more like "it's weird to tell someone to grow up over this".
 
As a new Trek fan, I enjoy watching all the films from beginning to end at least once a year. I've started watching them again. I watched the first two last night. TMP is a pretty dull film; the second and subsequent ones are better, but the TNG films are still my favorites. I think it was a good thing that Roddenberry moved away from the "film" franchise after the first film. The Star Trek perspective might have worked for a weekly TV show, but it wouldn't have worked for a "theatrical" film. When you're making a "theatrical" film, you need something more action-packed.
Welcome to Trekdom, this ain't controversial at all! :hugegrin:
 
My whole issue with the floating nacelles is there doesn't seem to be a purpose to them. The nacelles don't change position or alignment, they just float there for no other reason than to be futuristically "kewl."
Blame the DISCO Production staff for making use of the floating nacelles once by moving it out of standard position.
 
My whole issue with the floating nacelles is there doesn't seem to be a purpose to them. The nacelles don't change position or alignment, they just float there for no other reason than to be futuristically "kewl."
IMHO it is kind of cool, though:lol:
The Enterprise is such a silly and impractical shape, with the bridge a big vulnerable target on top, that floating nacelles are only an issue for people who haven't REALLY thought about it.

I just wish they did more with the futuristic concepts. Even the giant turbolift caverns could have been amazing if they said they were using magical TARDIS technology.
 
Yesterday I watched movies 5, 6,7, and 8. I don't think 5 is a terrible movie as people say. The ending of the 6th movie, with what they said at the end of the 'kirk' movie, was like a final word to the original series cast. Why did they use Forty again in the 7th movie, take it 73 years ahead, and kill him off? It was an extremely unnecessary move. The 6th movie has a good final word. In the 7th movie, they could have just said "73 years later in the peace treaty with the Klingon" and moved straight to Captain Picard. As for the 8th movie, it's simply great, the series is the best.
 
Call me contrarian, but I don’t like First Contact. I think all of the TNG films are awful dreck that do very little to add anything to the overall Trek universe and are paper thin in their characterization and plotting. FC is no different.

And I love TMP. Warts (and boy are there warts) and all.
 
Even the giant turbolift caverns could have been amazing if they said they were using magical TARDIS technology.
The TurboLift Cavern made no logical design/engineering sense.

If you have access to Magical TARDIS-like Tech, you wouldn't need entire large StarShips.

You would obviously have the outside be the size of a shuttle and the inside be as large as you want like what we saw in ST:ENT.
 
Call me contrarian, but I don’t like First Contact. I think all of the TNG films are awful dreck that do very little to add anything to the overall Trek universe and are paper thin in their characterization and plotting. FC is no different.

And I love TMP. Warts (and boy are there warts) and all.
I too do not enjoy enjoy First Contact that much. Easily would watch TMP before it.
 
My whole issue with the floating nacelles is there doesn't seem to be a purpose to them. The nacelles don't change position or alignment, they just float there for no other reason than to be futuristically "kewl."

Well you see this done so a ship can go into battle mode without the engines connected to the ship thus removing them as a target from enemy fire. No matter how much damage is done, the ship can always connect back to it's engine nacelles and go to warp, thus removing the risk of a ship being dead in space and not being able to move.
 
Well you see this done so a ship can go into battle mode without the engines connected to the ship thus removing them as a target from enemy fire. No matter how much damage is done, the ship can always connect back to it's engine nacelles and go to warp, thus removing the risk of a ship being dead in space and not being able to move.
The warp core is still within the ship and thus can still be damaged and potentially breach. At which point the nacelles aren't going to do any good no matter if their with the ship or not.
 
The floating nacelles were a difference that made no difference. Like quantum torpedoes vs. photon torpedoes. Or phasers and phase pistols.
Funniest part of the Floating nacelles is you'd think that they exist to make it harder to sabotage them and cripple the ship because they are disconnected...and then the season ends with them going to the nacelle and sabotaging it to cripple the ship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kkt
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top