i apologize. this attack upon their vessel was not authorized by my government.Okay, so I asked him to tone it down, and then you repeat the same behavior in the very next post?
Knock it off.
And Chekov used to heat the rock on the frigid planet surface in "Spock's Brain(TOS)."
Yep, and that was both the fifth episode ever produced as well as aired. Phasers used to heat up inanimate surfaces was already a thing before the series even got a shuttlecraft.Sulu and the others on the surface did that as well in "The Enemy Within."
Welcome to Trekdom, this ain't controversial at all!As a new Trek fan, I enjoy watching all the films from beginning to end at least once a year. I've started watching them again. I watched the first two last night. TMP is a pretty dull film; the second and subsequent ones are better, but the TNG films are still my favorites. I think it was a good thing that Roddenberry moved away from the "film" franchise after the first film. The Star Trek perspective might have worked for a weekly TV show, but it wouldn't have worked for a "theatrical" film. When you're making a "theatrical" film, you need something more action-packed.
Blame the DISCO Production staff for making use of the floating nacelles once by moving it out of standard position.My whole issue with the floating nacelles is there doesn't seem to be a purpose to them. The nacelles don't change position or alignment, they just float there for no other reason than to be futuristically "kewl."
IMHO it is kind of cool, thoughMy whole issue with the floating nacelles is there doesn't seem to be a purpose to them. The nacelles don't change position or alignment, they just float there for no other reason than to be futuristically "kewl."
Yes. "Hard Time (DS9)" hard time.I'll take floating nacelles over roller coaster and TARDIS turboshafts. Those still demand somebody do hard time in prison to serve justice.
The TurboLift Cavern made no logical design/engineering sense.Even the giant turbolift caverns could have been amazing if they said they were using magical TARDIS technology.
I too do not enjoy enjoy First Contact that much. Easily would watch TMP before it.Call me contrarian, but I don’t like First Contact. I think all of the TNG films are awful dreck that do very little to add anything to the overall Trek universe and are paper thin in their characterization and plotting. FC is no different.
And I love TMP. Warts (and boy are there warts) and all.
I mean, Star Trek is made for popular entertainment. Visual flair and stuff that looks "kewl" is part of the deal.My whole issue with the floating nacelles is there doesn't seem to be a purpose to them. The nacelles don't change position or alignment, they just float there for no other reason than to be futuristically "kewl."
My whole issue with the floating nacelles is there doesn't seem to be a purpose to them. The nacelles don't change position or alignment, they just float there for no other reason than to be futuristically "kewl."
The warp core is still within the ship and thus can still be damaged and potentially breach. At which point the nacelles aren't going to do any good no matter if their with the ship or not.Well you see this done so a ship can go into battle mode without the engines connected to the ship thus removing them as a target from enemy fire. No matter how much damage is done, the ship can always connect back to it's engine nacelles and go to warp, thus removing the risk of a ship being dead in space and not being able to move.
Funniest part of the Floating nacelles is you'd think that they exist to make it harder to sabotage them and cripple the ship because they are disconnected...and then the season ends with them going to the nacelle and sabotaging it to cripple the ship.The floating nacelles were a difference that made no difference. Like quantum torpedoes vs. photon torpedoes. Or phasers and phase pistols.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.