Though most of the stories in I, Robot were based on the idea that it was never quite as straightforward as it appeared on paper.
Yes, as I mentioned. But the point is that none of them were "evil," in the sense of having malicious intent. They were incapable of knowingly doing anything in defiance of the standards of "right" behavior hard-wired into their brains. It's just that those brains, and the situations they encountered, were complex enough that sometimes the Laws and the context interacted in unanticipated ways.
Actually, that story seems to be most applicable, in that it fits with how Demerzel was trying to find ways to resist her imperatives from Cleon 1.
I'm not sure she was trying. People like the Zephyr and Day were urging her to resist, suggesting ways around the restrictions, but she always rejected it. She may have wished she could resist on some level, but I don't think her programming allowed her any volition toward that goal.
Though speaking of robots, we may be heading back to the overtly non-Asimovian robots of season 1. In the interview I linked to earlier, Goyer talks a bit more about the agreement he negotiated with Fox (who owns the adaptation rights to Asimov's robot stories and is developing a new I, Robot project), and that it was strictly limited, something along the lines of "In episode X of Foundation, you can use the words 'three laws of robotics,' in episode Y you can use the name 'Daneel,'" so it's uncertain if a similar license can be struck by the new creative team. On the one hand, the Fox executive involved is a science fiction fan and has been enjoying the show, but on the other hand, he had a direct working relationship with Goyer which led to Goyer being in a position to ask for official permission to use robot-verse elements in the show (reminds me of the co-ownership situation with the adaptation rights for Marvel comics characters, and the reputably detailed breakdown not just on what studios got which characters, but who got which aspects of characters, demarcating a specific "X-Men Quicksilver" and "Avengers Quicksilver," for instance).
Oh, I didn't know that. I assumed they had the rights to the whole thing and that the plan was to bring in more of the robot elements as they went. Given the cliffhanger ending, it's hard to see what they could manage if they're not allowed to mention the Laws or Daneel or any of that history anymore.
My theory is they have to destroy the Cleons because the nanites can keep them alive a very long time. Just not in very good condition when they get very old. Maybe they go nuts and they didn’t get Dusk soon enough.
I think the existential dread of knowing he was going to be executed on a prescheduled day that was looming fast is enough to account for his reaction without reading anything else into it. On top of that, he feared that his reign would be remembered as inconsequential, and he resented that he had to give way to a successor like Day who was essentially useless while he was still fully capable of ruling. Especially with the Prime Radiant predicting the fall of everything if nothing changed. It probably seemed entirely rational to Dusk that letting himself die and give way to a useless Day would have been the catalyst of that downfall, so tearing down the whole system, killing Demerzel (his unpreventable death "clock"), and seizing absolute power would be the only way to save the Empire.
After all, the basic Cleon psyche is narcissistic, which is why Cleon I set up a system whereby all his successors would be him. The idea of being discarded like a used-up part would be intolerable to that kind of psyche, but the three successive Cleons were always trained to think and act as identically as possible, so that the current Dusk would feel that he would live on in Day and Dawn and be willing to accept dissolution. But this season showed us from the start that the system was breaking down and this trio of Cleons had never managed to achieve that unity. Dusk couldn't see Day or even Dawn as a continuation of himself, especially after both of them had betrayed the Empire and abandoned their duties, and after Day had (supposedly) died. They both could've been replaced with backups, but those backups would've had their memories and personalities and thus would have been just as unsuitable as successors. So Dusk saw himself as the only true Cleon left, the only one who could keep Empire alive, and that put him on the defensive and drove him to extreme measures to ensure his survival.
So it wasn't a generic kind of madness. It was a direct outgrowth of the unique circumstances of this particular Brother Dusk. Even if he was driven to extremes of malignancy and paranoia, it was in response to the events we were shown throughout the season.
Loved the reveal that the second Foundation was on Trantor itself ( i assume that was the intention of that reveal).
That is where it turned out to be in the books, IIRC. It was said to be at the other end of the galaxy, but someone realized that if the galaxy is a circle, the other end of a circular path is its starting point. (Yeah, yeah, but don't blame me, blame Asimov.)