• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Strange New Worlds' showrunners advise fans to write to Skydance and Paramount if they're interested in a "Year One" Kirk sequel series

I'm with you on that, actually! I'm a bit surprised that it isn't a "Years Four and Five", or (better yet), the post-TMP approach you mentioned. I guess Goldsman and Myers just really like the idea of moving straight from Strange New Worlds' series finale, and building further on Kirk's formative moments as captain. Which is all well and good. But still, haha.
Yeah, I'd rather have a TMP-era Year Six than Year One. Get some of that generation-Matalas movie-era nostalgia pumping, plus it's more open-ended.

On the other hand, they've done a surprisingly good job of recontextualizing TOS already; like I always say, if someone dumped me in a splashy song-and-dance number then decided they wanted to get back together, I'd throw their soup in the hallway, too. And as CLB points out, there's a lot of potential in an extremely direct TOS prequel, for those who dare greatly and aren't afraid of accusations of fannish blank-filling or slavish adherence to canon. But Andor show that's possible; it's braided tight to Rogue One and the rest of the Star Wars storytelling of that era, down to giving backstories for random props and costume pieces from the movie, and the common meme you hear is that it was so good because the people involved didn't care about referencing Star Wars, just because it didn't feel referential. Focusing tight on the early-installment weirdness of TOS's first episodes might be the very tack to take, doing "unexpected" things like putting Sulu in blue and Uhura and Spock in gold, or giving Kirk a dirtbag best friend who actually acts like the Kirk stereotype.
 
Do I get to show run? I’m just *dreaming* of Jim Henson Puppets recreating all of my favourite characters!!!
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I'm not sure what Goldman is trying to do here. He said there's stories that can be told here before WNMHGB. True, but we are talking about a pretty narrow window here. Why would you want to spearhead a new project with such a rigid timeline . ? Yeah they can do a one-off miniseries but it seems weird to want to shoehorn a new project that takes place before TOS with very litte runway to use afterwards . Unless he thinks they can do multiple seasons that can take place in one or 2 years in Trek time.? 2264/65?

Yes I know this is a likely a pipe dream especially with the studio change happening. But let's asume this could still be a possibility with the new decision makers . Why make this play?

Is this plan a way to soften the blow on essentially wanting to do his version of TOS?. Bit of a bait and switch strategy ? >>Let's just do a 1 year mini series - still just a prequel to TOS. And if it's a big success, then parlay that fan goodwill to continue on and make a TOS 2.0.?

Im not dead against seeing some form of continuance for SNW characters . I'm just not sure his vision is the best way of doing it. Or we need more clarification on what exactly his plan is.
 
Last edited:
Yes I know this is a likely a pipe dream especially with the studio change happening. But let's asume this could still be a possibility with the new decision makers . Why make this play?
He wants to.

It's the ultimate in fan service; a fan doing what they want to do without thinking too much about "the play."
 
I'm not sure what Goldman is trying to do here. He said there's stories that can be told here before WNMHGB. True, but we are talking about a pretty narrow window here. Why would you want to spearhead a new project with such a rigid timeline . ? Yeah they can do a one-off miniseries but it seems weird to want to shoehorn a new project that takes place before TOS with very litte runway to use afterwards . Unless he thinks they can do multiple seasons that can take place in one or 2 years in Trek time.? 2264/65?

Yes I know this is a likely a pipe dream especially with the studio change happening. But let's asume this could still be a possibility with the new decision makers . Why make this play?

Is this plan a way to soften the blow on essentially wanting to do his version of TOS?. Bit of a bait and switch strategy ? >>Let's just do a 1 year mini series - still just a prequel to TOS. And if it's a big success, then parlay that fan goodwill to continue on and make a TOS 2.0.?

Im not dead against seeing some form of continuance for SNW characters . I'm just not sure his vision is the best way of doing it. Or we need more clarification on what exactly his plan is.

I’m not sure there is a plan.
 
'm not sure what Goldman is trying to do here. He said there's stories that can be told here before WNMHGB. True, but we are talking about a pretty narrow window here. Why would you want to spearhead a new project with such a rigid timeline . ? Yeah they can do a one-off miniseries but it seems weird to want to shoehorn a new project that takes place before TOS with very litte runway to use afterwards . Unless he thinks they can do multiple seasons that can take place in one or 2 years in Trek time.? 2264/65?
They can tell numerous stories before WNMHGB and between WNMHGB and the end of the five year missions. Few episodes of TOS happen concurrently.
 
He wants to.

It's the ultimate in fan service; a fan doing what they want to do without thinking too much about "the play."

Even from geeky fan perspective his vision doesn't make sense . Star Trek Year 1 doesn't sound like a sustainable TV show . what,...we are going to see multiple seasons of "Year 1". ? Yeah doesn't feel he's put much 3 dimensional thought to it.
 
Last edited:
Even from geeky fan perspective his vision doesn't make sense . Star Trek Year 1 doesn't sound like a sustainable TV show . what,...we are going to see multiple season of "Year 1". ? Yeah doesn't feel he's put much 3 dimensional thought to it.
Probably not.

Does he need to go to the fans with these things?

Picture your perfect Trek project. How sustainable is it? How many seasons? What characters do you want to see? How long are their stories?
 
News release to the Media.. Star Trek Year 1 announced

" Watch Star Trek Year 1's mult-year journey with Captain Kirk in his early days of taking command and all the in-between adventures that happened during his historic 5 year mission. "

I just don't see how you can pitch this to the new decision makers IMO.
 
News release to the Media.. Star Trek Year 1 announced

" Watch Star Trek Year 1's mult-year journey with Captain Kirk in his early days of taking command and all the in-between adventures that happened during his historic 5 year mission. "

I just don't see how you can pitch this to the new decision makers IMO.
I noticed no answers to my questions.

I'll trust a professional then to give it the old college try if he is given the opportunity.


But, what do I know? I watch MASH, and 11 season series about a 3 year conflict, with the worst timeline in terms of actual history. So clearly TV producers don't give a shit about history... :shrug:
 
I noticed no answers to my questions.

I'll trust a professional then to give it the old college try if he is given the opportunity.


But, what do I know? I watch MASH, and 11 season series about a 3 year conflict, with the worst timeline in terms of actual history. So clearly TV producers don't give a shit about history... :shrug:

IMO , I wouldn't do another TOS prequel just following a TOS prequel. But Maybe his idea has merit. I just think if he wants us to write in to support his idea, it would be nice to know what exactly hws thinking of doing. Maybe his idea has merit , I dont pretend to know any better. Just a fan with my musings.

I actually a super MASH fan. Own it on Itunes and DVD. Have you listened to Jeff Maxwell's podcast?

Yes totally aware they ( MASH) did 11 seasons that represents 3 years in real life. But to me Goldman's idea sounds like trying to do a new MASH series today that takes place just prior to the pilot and " in between " existing episodes of MASH. I guess it could work. I'm open to it. Just doesn’t seem enough there for a viable pitch IMO

Honestly , I would do Section 31 style standalone movies with Paul Wesley and crew. . And just do a New series that takes place in the 25th century. Not necessarily Legacy.
 
Last edited:
IMO , I wouldn't do another TOS prequel just following a TOS prequel. Maybe his idea has merit. I just think if he wants us to write in to support his idea, it would be nice to know what exactly hies thinking of doing. May his idea has merit , I dont pretend to know any better. Just a fan with my musings.

I actually a super MASH fan. Own it on Itunes and DVD. Have you listened to Jeff Maxwell' podcast?

Yes totally aware they did 11 seasons that represents 3 in real life. But to me Goldman's idea sounds like trying to do a new MASH series today that takes place just prior to the pilot and " in between " existing episodes of MASH. I guess it could work. I'm open to it. Just doesn’t seem ( enough there for a pitch)

Honestly , I would do Section 31 style standalone movies. And just do a New series that takes place in the 25th century. Not necessarily Legacy.
I think it could work.

If a fan wants to I won't argue against them. If it were me, I wouldn't want fans questioning me.

As for MASH, the work I could do between pilot and "To Market, To Market" based on history would be fun.
 
I think it could work.

If a fan wants to I won't argue against them. If it were me, I wouldn't want fans questioning me.

As for MASH, the work I could do between pilot and "To Market, To Market" based on history would be fun.
Sound interesting . My idea would be to do a theatrical movie called "Young Soldiers " Based on H
Sherman Potter in his early military career. Cast young actors to play Potter and his was buddies. We would see his times with his old comrades Stein, Gresky, Gianelli and Ryan. A theatrical prequel to "Old Soldiers ". Chronicalling many of his other war stories including the time he was taken prisonor in the Argon Forrest and include flash backs from when he was a child . Like the time his Uncle ( a vet doctor) first cut open into an animal which made Potter want to become a doctor.
 
Last edited:
Nah, not only do I not like the idea of Kirk Year One I also think letter writing campaigns are silly and don't do anything. TOS was not saved by dumb letters in the 60s and it won't make a difference this time either. The new Skydance overlords either want more Star Trek or not. I'm good either way, 22 seasons plus a tv movie plus a bunch of Short Treks is pretty good and I don't think taking a break again would necessarily be a bad thing.
 
No.
There's no way they can write and style it without violating the continuity of TOS.
Let's make ST: Legacy instead. Perhaps we could salvage some SNW characters by time-travelling them to 2402 DSC-style.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top