What If Disney Princesses Were Starfleet Officers?
- Thread starter Danja
- Start date
I wonder (especially given the fanservice "uniforms" that make MU uniforms look downright chaste) how many days before Disney finds out about this, and puts in a takedown order?
Anybody care to start a pool?
Anybody care to start a pool?
It falls under Parody (Fair use).
YouTube has some fairly sophisticated algorithms. If they were doing anything bad, it would've been caught before now.
Dunno . . . Disney's legal department can get downright vindictive if they decide a character is being used in a way that might damage Disney branding.
Trust me, I've seen Disney's princesses put through MUCH worse than joining Starfleet.
We're talking softcore porn here (Make of it what you will.
)
Last edited:
Are any of these things not "fanservice"?
Oh, honey ... Where have you BEEN for the past thirty years?
Trek is nothing if not about fan service:
Those uniforms are not canonically accurate, which I've decided is something I care about at the moment. I will be preparing a lengthy protest post forthwith.
Oh, honey ... Where have you BEEN for the past thirty years?
Trek is nothing if not about fan service:
Funny: I can't seem to recall Seven (or mirror-Marlena, or mirror-Uhura) in the sort of g-string postulated for Belle and Aurora.
A certain Roddenberry quote comes to mind.
Trek is nothing if not about fan service:
Funny: I can't seem to recall Seven (or mirror-Marlena, or mirror-Uhura) in the sort of g-string postulated for Belle and Aurora.
A certain Roddenberry quote comes to mind.
Last edited:
Oh, honey ... Where have you BEEN for the past thirty years?
Trek is nothing if not about fan service:
Funny: I can't seem to recall Seven (or mirror-Marlena, or mirror-Uhura) in the sort of g-string postulated for Belle and Aurora.
Seven doesn't NEED a mirror version of herself to give her a "dark side" (it's been baked in from the very beginning
).Enterprise came close (by early 2000s network TV standards) when they did "In a Mirror, Darkly" and the hot girl-on-girl Hoshi-T'Pol fighting action.
It should... but you can go broke trying to defend your parody fair use case against Disney.
Trust me, I've seen Disney's princesses put through MUCH worse than joining Starfleet.
We're talking softcore porn here (Make of it what you will.
Good thing I didn't create it
At least they're keeping it in the family!
Last edited:
Rule 34, Danja. Rule 34.Trust me, I've seen Disney's princesses put through MUCH worse than joining Starfleet.
We're talking softcore porn here (Make of it what you will.
Look out! They've got blasters, and they appear to know how to use them!
AI Generated Slop.
Why the hell would you post this crap here? Not only is it pretty bad from an aesthetic point of view (to put it mildly), but other than the “Starfleet” in the video title I barely see any relevance to Trek. And even though I’m aware that there’s way worse stuff out there, I still think it’s in poor taste to portray these characters from children’s entertainment (who are often coded as pretty young themselves) in this hypersexualized way.
Yeah, I don't think I would mind it so much if these characters were actually wearing Starfleet uniforms, rather than whatever the hell this is supposed to be.
I'm not sure I'd go that far. Although I certainly agree that it's in rather poor taste, and the hypersexualization is downright defamatory to the characters. But it is funny, in a slightly sick way. Although a couple of the characters were more than a little bit obscure, obscure enough to get me to look them up.
Nailed it. Hence my earlier comment about g-strings.
Now @fireproof78's cosplay photo of a squadron of Disney Princesses who look ready to kick some serious ass, that's funnier than the video was. And in better taste. And I can just imagine them appearing on the doorstep of the video's creator, to do some serious attitude adjustment. Whence came the picture? A D23 convention? ComicCon?
Last edited:
